Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Started By
Message
locked post

Better Coach: Mark Richt or Phil Fulmer

Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:53 am
Posted by lowspark12
nashville, tn
Member since Aug 2009
22365 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:53 am
Fulmer:
16 full seasons
152-52 (74.5%)
8-7 bowl record
2 SEC Titles (97/98)
5 SECCG Appearances
1 National Title

Richt:
13 seasons
126-45 (73.6%)
8-5 bowl record
2 SEC Titles (02/05)
5 SECCG Appearances

Richt owns the head-to-head record 5-3... he's also not done a UGA. As of right now, who has had the more success career?... what about after Richt retires?

i'll say Richt, but it's a pretty close call imo
Posted by craigbiggio
Member since Dec 2009
31805 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:54 am to
Fulmer
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86441 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:55 am to
Thank God I'm about to leave the office for a while and won't be able to read the nonsense to follow.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64501 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:56 am to
Fulmer, not sure how you give the edge to Richt with the stats you posted
This post was edited on 6/10/14 at 11:58 am
Posted by c on z
Zamunda
Member since Mar 2009
127389 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:56 am to
# of Losing seasons between the two coaches?
Posted by volfan30
Member since Jun 2010
40949 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:58 am to
Fulmer with Cutcliffe had a winning percentage right at 80.

Fulmer without Cutcliffe was shite tier.

Fulmer w/ Cutcliffe > Richt > Fulmer w/out Cucliffe
Posted by lowspark12
nashville, tn
Member since Aug 2009
22365 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:59 am to
2 for Fulmer... 1 for MR.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67482 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 12:00 pm to
inB4richtlosescontrolofthisthread
Posted by gatorhata9
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2010
26174 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 12:00 pm to
This thread should be full of intelligent responses
Posted by ipodking
#StopTalkingAboutWomensSports
Member since Jun 2008
56279 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 12:00 pm to
The national title puts Fulmer on top
Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
15300 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Fulmer
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 12:04 pm to
Definitely Richt.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

The national title puts Fulmer on top

So then Chizik and Coker > Richt as well?
Posted by Prettyboy Floyd
Pensacola, Florida
Member since Dec 2013
15655 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

The national title puts Fulmer on top


That year...man. They squeaked out so many and got better as the year went on.
Posted by bamagreycoat
Member since Oct 2012
5749 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 12:08 pm to
Richt but not by much. I still say Richt will win a BCS NC before he leaves Georgia to be a missionary in Bangladesh.
Posted by TRUERockyTop
Appalachia
Member since Sep 2011
15812 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 12:10 pm to
Fulmer
Posted by SpartyGator
Detroit Lions fan
Member since Oct 2011
75398 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 12:11 pm to
Richt...and he hasn't gone bowl-less like Fulmer has (2005 and 2008)
Posted by DuncanIdaho
Ouray, CO
Member since Feb 2013
14970 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

So then Chizik and Coker > Richt as well?


No, Fulmer was comparable in every other category. Your argument is apples to oranges.
Posted by CountryVolFan
Knoxville, TN
Member since Dec 2008
2969 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

1 National Title


Actually they are about equal. Richt has had better OC's and Fulmer had a better DC.
Posted by iglass
North Alabama
Member since Apr 2012
2917 posts
Posted on 6/10/14 at 12:21 pm to
Foolmer absolutely DOMINATES Richt


















at eating Krispy Kreme doughnuts
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter