Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/15/24 at 12:01 pm to pbro62
quote:
ou should know about butt fricking your sister gump
I wouldn't cast stones. Lousiana ranks not too far behind Alabama for inbreeding.
Top 10 Most Inbred States Revealed
West Virginia: Known for its mountainous terrain and historical isolation, West Virginia ranks high in inbreeding rates due to its geographical and cultural factors.
Kentucky: With a strong equestrian culture and a history of close-knit communities, Kentucky shows elevated levels of inbreeding.
Mississippi: This southern state has faced socioeconomic challenges, contributing to a higher likelihood of inbreeding within certain communities.
Alabama: Cultural and historical factors, along with geographic isolation in rural areas, contribute to increased inbreeding rates in Alabama.
Arkansas: Rural communities and historical factors contribute to the prevalence of inbreeding in Arkansas.
Oklahoma: Certain Native American tribes and rural communities in Oklahoma have higher rates of consanguineous relationships.
Louisiana: Cultural practices and historical factors have led to higher rates of inbreeding in certain regions of Louisiana.
Tennessee: Historical and socioeconomic factors contribute to the inbreeding rates observed in Tennessee.
South Carolina: Isolated rural communities and historical factors contribute to higher levels of inbreeding in South Carolina.
North Carolina: Historical factors, combined with isolated rural communities, contribute to increased inbreeding rates in North Carolina.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 12:19 pm to TS1926
Yeah, can we stick to sports and not these kinds of things? The sister fricker stuff doesn't work from one SEC team to another really. Esp. coming from Louisiana 
Posted on 2/15/24 at 12:25 pm to JetDawg
Someone please take this grandpa back to his room. The nurses have got to be worried about where is he right now.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 12:29 pm to TideFaninFl
There's no denying Alabama is a blue blood, and once upon a time, that gave certain programs advantages over other schools.
That started fading away in the late 90's and blue blood programs like Nebraska, Notre Dame, and others floundered as they couldn't live off of their brand any longer.
Some, like Ohio State, are still elite programs but don't have any real advantage over any other elite program now.
Alabama is now squarely in this camp.
That started fading away in the late 90's and blue blood programs like Nebraska, Notre Dame, and others floundered as they couldn't live off of their brand any longer.
Some, like Ohio State, are still elite programs but don't have any real advantage over any other elite program now.
Alabama is now squarely in this camp.
This post was edited on 2/15/24 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 2/15/24 at 12:42 pm to JalapenoJoe
quote:
tight ends coach
Stephen, as your lawyer, I'd recommend you hiring one of these as well the way your criminal career is heading.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 12:44 pm to JetDawg
quote:
UGA and the UTerus are first tier. So says Paul Finebaum.
Oh, dear
That's silly.
Bama still has more talent on their roster this upcoming season then anyone apart from perhaps UGA. Yes, they might fall back if Deboer isn't great as a recruiter, but for right now they are first tier.
Bama will likely go back to being dominant if Tennessee succeeds in their lawsuit against the NCAA. While individual states have NIL laws, the state of Alabama doesn't have any. If Tennessee succeeds in eliminating the only NCAA rule on NIL (you can't have pay to play contracts), Bama essentially will have no restrictions on NIL payments to players at all since their state has no laws on it. They'll be able to offer contracts that other schools can't.
Tennessee is basically trying to make Bama stay a juggernaut.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 12:58 pm to DawginSC
quote:
Bama will likely go back to being dominant if Tennessee succeeds in their lawsuit against the NCAA. While individual states have NIL laws, the state of Alabama doesn't have any. If Tennessee succeeds in eliminating the only NCAA rule on NIL (you can't have pay to play contracts), Bama essentially will have no restrictions on NIL payments to players at all since their state has no laws on it. They'll be able to offer contracts that other schools can't.
Tennessee is basically trying to make Bama stay a juggernaut.
As exciting as this sounds, I don't want Tennessee to win their lawsuit.
This unbridled free agency transfer portal shite has to stop.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 1:22 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
There's no denying Alabama is a blue blood, and once upon a time, that gave certain programs advantages over other schools.
That started fading away in the late 90's and blue blood programs like Nebraska, Notre Dame, and others floundered as they couldn't live off of their brand any longer.
Some, like Ohio State, are still elite programs but don't have any real advantage over any other elite program now.
Alabama is now squarely in this camp.
What is different is that Alabama is squarely in the top recruiting area of the country. Even though Coach Saban retired, Alabama's class still ended up at #2
Dispute it if you want, but Alabama is special in football
Posted on 2/15/24 at 2:04 pm to TideFaninFl
quote:
Dispute it if you want, but Alabama is special in football
What resource does Alabama football have in 2024 that no other program has?
Posted on 2/15/24 at 2:15 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
What resource does Alabama football have in 2024 that no other program has?
So why did Alabama, after losing the GOAT, still finish with the #2 class. Answer that and you have your answer.
Why did Alabama, after losing the GOAT in 82, still manage to win the SEC and National Title multiple times after that.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 2:17 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
What resource does Alabama football have in 2024 that no other program has?
Trying to make your opinion relevant by speaking on a subject matter you have no reasonable ability to speak on.. why would any Bama fan stoop so low as to try to prove any point to you..? your opinion is beneath us.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 2:23 pm to TS1926
quote:
I wouldn't cast stones. Lousiana ranks not too far behind Alabama for inbreeding.
Reminds me of the teen or 20-something girl from Church Point, LA, who fricked her father-in-law in her marriage bed multiple times, got pregnant and had a kid by him. Not exactly incest but definitely slutty. There was a mile-long thread on TD about it.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 2:26 pm to TideFaninFl
quote:
So why did Alabama, after losing the GOAT, still finish with the #2 class. Answer that and you have your answer.
Because the majority of your class was already signed by the time Saban announced his retirement.
Incoming freshmen who have already signed rarely transfer out during a coaching change.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 2:27 pm to TideFaninFl
quote:
Dispute it if you want, but Alabama is special in football
for now.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 2:27 pm to BamaStepL
quote:
Trying to make your opinion relevant by speaking on a subject matter you have no reasonable ability to speak on.. why would any Bama fan stoop so low as to try to prove any point to you..? your opinion is beneath us.
What resource does Alabama football have in 2024 that no other program has?
Posted on 2/15/24 at 2:30 pm to TideSaint
quote:
TideSaint
There are some posters not worth responding to.
Jet Dawg is at the top of the list. 17 year old kid with nothing to do but spout every nonsensical thought that pops into his head
Posted on 2/15/24 at 2:34 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Lol @ Side Taint and his lack of context.
At the end of 1981 Bama's record against LSU record was 31-10-4.
Since 1982 Bama's record against LSU is 17-24-1. That includes the worst decade in LSU history (90's) and the best era in Alabama history (Saban era).
Since 2000 Bama's record against LSU is 11-14.
The greatest coach in CFB history has now retired.
I don't think this is trending in the way you think it is.
since 2008?
Posted on 2/15/24 at 2:34 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Because the majority of your class was already signed by the time Saban announced his retirement.
Incoming freshmen who have already signed rarely transfer out during a coaching change.
New rules, while that may have been rare before, not now.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 2:34 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Since 1982 Bama's record against LSU is 17-24-1. That includes the worst decade in LSU history (90's) and the best era in Alabama history (Saban era).
Since 2000 Bama's record against LSU is 11-14.
I believe you got that backwards, pimpette. I didn't scan the thread to see if anyone fact-checked you on this, but I immediately knew you were wrong as soon as I read it. Alabama went 8-2 against LSU in the 90s as well as 8-3 against them in the 2010s. The math just didn't add up. Anyways:
Alabama is 25-17-1 against LSU since 1982, with seven of the 17 losses occurring between 2000-2007.
This post was edited on 2/15/24 at 2:44 pm
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News