Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/24/12 at 8:39 pm to BC22
quote:
11 and 12 have backed their way into the BCSNCG
How does one back into a national championship?
IIRC, both teams had one loss...which is equivalent to earning your way into the game. I hope you get AIDS for Christmas btw
Posted on 12/24/12 at 9:01 pm to samson73103
I disagree that 2012 isnt even in the same galaxy. Our defense struggled mightily for about 3 or 4 quarters all year. I think that their performance in death valley is excusable and the SEC championship game was just a balls to the wall game on both sides. And then there is Johnny fricking football. They still finished number 1 in total defense.
This year's offense was more well rounded and dynamic than 09 and 11. Call me crazy but i think lacy\yeldon is just as badass as mi\tr or tr/el.
This year's offense was more well rounded and dynamic than 09 and 11. Call me crazy but i think lacy\yeldon is just as badass as mi\tr or tr/el.
Posted on 12/24/12 at 9:38 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
How does one back into a national championship?
Dunno, but your fellow Bammers claim all the frick day long that LSU "backed into" the 2007 NC. So straighten them out for me, 'kay? Thx
Posted on 12/24/12 at 9:42 pm to Tigerbait337
2010
Posted on 12/24/12 at 10:03 pm to Thunder Tiger
quote:
Dunno, but your fellow Bammers claim all the frick day long that LSU "backed into" the 2007 NC
I think this is mainly in response to all the shite LSU fans have dealt Bama over the "Mulligan Bowl" as yall like to call it. LSU took advantage in 2007 of other teams losing to move into position to play for the NC, just like every other team before or since that wasn't wire-to-wire #1 or #2 in the polls. Both 2007 LSU and 2011, 2012 Bama deserved their shot at the title. Anyone who says otherwise is trolling. Sometimes I think the trolls outnumber the legitimate posters on this board.
Posted on 12/24/12 at 10:11 pm to samson73103
quote:
Sometimes I think the trolls outnumber the legitimate posters on this board.
Naw
Posted on 12/24/12 at 10:12 pm to Tigerbait337
2010 was better than all of them.
Posted on 12/24/12 at 10:17 pm to Tigerbait337
According to that what if sports thing by MSN, the first simulation I ran had '12 winning 9-7 with '11 dominating the games though.
This post was edited on 12/24/12 at 10:23 pm
Posted on 12/24/12 at 10:18 pm to wadewilson
12 has the best offense...09 the worst
12 has the worst defense...09 and 11 were both historically good, but 11's was better I think
09 had by far the best special teams.
I bet 11 beats 12, 12 beats 09, and 09 beats 11
Who's the best out of rock, paper, and scissors?
12 has the worst defense...09 and 11 were both historically good, but 11's was better I think
09 had by far the best special teams.
I bet 11 beats 12, 12 beats 09, and 09 beats 11
Who's the best out of rock, paper, and scissors?
Posted on 12/24/12 at 10:46 pm to samson73103
quote:
I think this is mainly in response to all the shite LSU fans have dealt Bama over the "Mulligan Bowl" as yall like to call it. LSU took advantage in 2007 of other teams losing to move into position to play for the NC, just like every other team before or since that wasn't wire-to-wire #1 or #2 in the polls. Both 2007 LSU and 2011, 2012 Bama deserved their shot at the title. Anyone who says otherwise is trolling. Sometimes I think the trolls outnumber the legitimate posters on this board.
Four points:
1. The LSU "backing into" the 2007 NC bullshite began well before the "Mulligan Bowl";
2. As SEC champs and most deserving 2-loss team in 2007, LSU didn't "back into" anything;
3. While I wouldn't call it "backing in", Bama did not deserve a Mulligan in 2011 in lieu of conference champ OSU who had a better overall resume';
4. As SEC champs with 1 loss to a very good A&M team, Bama does deserve a NC shot this year.
That is all.
Posted on 12/24/12 at 10:58 pm to samson73103
quote:
That includes 2010 Auburn, led by the rented mule, $cam Newton
The 2010 game is on FoxSportsSouth right now. You should turn flip it over and watch that rented mule bend saban and 101,000 inbred rednecks over and ram his moose dong up their arse.
Merry Christmas
This post was edited on 12/24/12 at 10:59 pm
Posted on 12/24/12 at 11:07 pm to Tigerbait337
My avi says Bama fans so frick it
2011 and it's not even close
second 09
Here's 2012 but still win a NC.
2011 and it's not even close
second 09
Here's 2012 but still win a NC.
This post was edited on 12/24/12 at 11:08 pm
Posted on 12/24/12 at 11:09 pm to Tigerbait337
This post was edited on 2/15/13 at 10:23 pm
Posted on 12/24/12 at 11:17 pm to JDM1992
Many people saw this year as a rebuilding year, and in many regards it was. IMO '11>'09>>>'12='10
This post was edited on 12/24/12 at 11:18 pm
Posted on 12/24/12 at 11:26 pm to Tigerbait337
2011 is easily the best of the 3 imo.
Posted on 12/24/12 at 11:28 pm to UAFanFromNOLA
I ran the WhatIf Sim Matchup three times... thought the 2011 team looked pretty impressive until I realized I made them the home team all three games.
Roll your own HERE.
Roll your own HERE.
Posted on 12/24/12 at 11:43 pm to Tigerbait337
1. '11
2. '09
3. '12
2. '09
3. '12
Posted on 12/24/12 at 11:50 pm to Tigerbait337
to me '10 was the most talented. Not the most motivated though...
Posted on 12/24/12 at 11:52 pm to wadewilson
quote:
2010 was better than all of them.
agree
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News