Started By
Message
re: Auburn Acknowledges NCCA Claims of 1913, 1983, & 1993 National Championship
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:16 pm to Rabern57
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:16 pm to Rabern57
quote:
The problem is Bama fans want to claim 19-2 or 14-2. The entire reason Bama fans are posting in here is to down play Auburn's number while still claiming whatever the number they have made up now.
The list Auburn is using would give Bama 19, but you disparage them for claiming 15? That's the problem.
1
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:16 pm to Gcockboi
56-17
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:17 pm to graves1
quote:Yeah. You and I, just like everyone else knows why Bama fans came running in here. Claiming otherwise is as dumb as yall trying to use a double standard to count NCs.
No, we are here to laugh at you. Not all Auburn fans. Just you........
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:17 pm to elposter
Apparently all you to do is provide a recognizable publication that recognizes it so here it is Anderson & Hester, Congrove Computer Rankings
And you can put us down for 9
And you can put us down for 9
This post was edited on 5/16/14 at 3:18 pm
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:18 pm to undecided
1913 is perfectly fine.
1983 is laughable
1993 is even more laughable.
1983 is laughable
1993 is even more laughable.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:18 pm to Bama Bird
quote:
In terms of "robbed" teams... Auburn doesn't come close to Penn State, by the way.
Both were screwed equally.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:19 pm to Rabern57
It was to laugh. Point. And laugh some more.
That is why the Alabama fans are here. You also forgot the other teams fans that are here just to laugh at you......
That is why the Alabama fans are here. You also forgot the other teams fans that are here just to laugh at you......
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:19 pm to LSUNV
quote:
Apparently all you to do is provide a recognizable publication that recognizes it so here it is Anderson & Hester, Congrove Computer Rankings
Nope, we have all agreed to use the NCAA mega-list. It's plenty generous. It's a clean line and the research is all done for us. If your team didn't make that list, then they just didn't cut it.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:20 pm to RandySavage
Just think.. we're less than 5 yrs away from seeing this guy back on Auburn's campus, to celebrate their 25th anniversary for their NC.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:20 pm to undecided
Beaver cleaver approves this message.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:20 pm to elposter
People can claim whatever the hell they want, the mainstream public and media only recognize AP and Coaches poll titles anyway.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:20 pm to undecided
Seriously, Auburn you should feel embarrassed by this. It's a little pathetic.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:21 pm to S.E.C. Crazy
quote:
Beaver cleaver approves this message.
link?
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:21 pm to elposter
Says who, when saying we all, I haven't. From what I have seen that list includes Oklahoma for 2003 , which is the team we beat, so if they get it we do to
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:21 pm to abellsujr
I think it is awesome. Auburn people have gotten used to doing what we want and not worrying about how it is perceived. We're like a less batshit version of A&M
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:21 pm to S.E.C. Crazy
nice sig quote...difference is I didn't have to make up your dumbass statement
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:21 pm to Old Hellen Yeller
quote:The list Bama fans are in here claiming Auburn should use has Bama winning 9.
The list Auburn is using would give Bama 19, but you disparage them for claiming 15? That's the problem.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:23 pm to wareagle2007
Seems like Auburn is always trying to be bama.
This post was edited on 5/16/14 at 3:23 pm
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:23 pm to LSUNV
quote:
And you can put us down for 9
My quick count on the definitive list is 7 for LSU (I could have missed one?). Very respectable. So far we have.
1. Alabama - 19
2. LSU - 7
3. Auburn - 5
The rest?
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:23 pm to Old Money
quote:That's it?
87,451
Page 9 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News