Started By
Message
At the end of the day, LSU is not getting kicked out of the SEC
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:44 am
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:44 am
Lane is not being sidelined, 1/2 of our budget is not being taken and whatever "end of the world" actions you think will happen.
7
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:46 am to LSU4Life2021
quote:
whatever "end of the world" actions you HOPE will happen.
FIFY
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:46 am to LSU4Life2021
LSU is the SEC! Bring the hate, this is awesome!!
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:47 am to LSU4Life2021
A judge doesn’t get to decide LSU membership, or whether teams refuse to play them. That is for the SEC Presidents to decide. They voted 15-0 against this garbage. I wouldn’t be so certain of myself if I were you
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:49 am to ColoradoAg
Oh that judge will try.
I heard he already told Kiffin that Wright must get 8 targets in the game….
I heard he already told Kiffin that Wright must get 8 targets in the game….
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:49 am to LSU4Life2021
SWAC would probably be a better cultural fit for their players and fanbase. They are used to the ghetto they are a fish out of water when they come to NW Arkansas and don't know how to act. That's why we played them in Little Rock for years
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 8:51 am
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:50 am to ColoradoAg
quote:
They voted 15-0 against this garbage
16-0
LSU voted against it too. Players sued the SEC and NCAA and won.
Now a court says LSU has to roster them or be in contempt.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:51 am to CatfishJohn
Still trying to educate that dolt?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:55 am to ColoradoAg
quote:
They voted 15-0 against this garbage. I wouldn’t be so certain of myself if I were you
lsu abstained pending the hearing.
Now LSU is enjoined to the SEC, and NCAA and cannot keep these players off the roster or be In contempt
Face it. We won. In more Ways than one. The entirety of athletes all over the world just saw ONLY ONE University and state had their back.
Good luck recruiting against that
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:58 am to LSU Patrick
quote:
whatever "end of the world" actions you HOPE will happen.
FIFY
I think "would like to see happen" is a better way to phrase it.
I don't even think LSU deserves that. It would just make for hilarious content.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:07 am to CatfishJohn
quote:
Now a court says LSU has to roster them or be in contempt.
Wait, you are suggesting that a team has no right to cut any player for any reason as they've been doing since, well forever? You're really trying to suggest this?
Some of you are badly misunderstanding what this ruling means.
The judge did not order LSU to give these players roster spots.
The ruling gives the players legal protection to remain eligible to play college sports and prevents the NCAA/SEC from simply declaring them ineligible or punishing a school for using the protected players.
That is not the same thing as a court ordering LSU: “You must put Dae’Quan Wright and Zxavian Harris on your 105-man roster.”
In fact, reporting immediately after the ruling described LSU’s next decision as whether to put them on the roster at all.
The judge also enjoined LSU from taking actions that negatively affect the protected players, which makes sense: otherwise the SEC could effectively defeat the injunction by threatening LSU until LSU refused to take them.
But that still doesn’t mean a judge is now setting LSU’s depth chart or deciding who Lane Kiffin has to keep on the football team.
There’s a huge legal difference between:
“The NCAA/SEC cannot make this player ineligible or punish LSU for playing him.”
and
“LSU is judicially required to give this player a roster spot.”
Good grief people.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 9:08 am
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:09 am to hookem33
This opens a great spot for Notre Dame.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:19 am to LSU4Life2021
Is he going to have to tell these two players they cannot play because the penalties that are coming to lsu are too severe? Dang that would be harsh and such a disaster for Kiffin. It’s a strong possibility
The sec is not giving in
The sec is not giving in
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:20 am to LSU4Life2021
quote:
SECby LSU4Life2021
Lane is not being sidelined, 1/2 of our budget is not being taken and whatever "end of the world" actions you think will happen
You think ONE judge based in Baton Rouge is really gonna have the final say so?
After all this is finally settled the only place LSU will be
able to go is the BIG XII
The BIG and even the ACC will want nothing to do with the corndogs.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:21 am to LSU4Life2021
LSU was never getting kicked out of the SEC.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:31 am to RD Dawg
quote:
You think ONE judge based in Baton Rouge is really gonna have the final say so?
Do you think one Federal judge In North Alabama is gonna have the final say so over LSU, Kiffin and the state of Louisiana?
The answer is no the underlying controversy and defendants are In Louisiana.
I THINK LSU wants to make the SEC explain why this case belongs in Alabama at all — and why a federal judge should intervene while a Louisiana judge is already exercising jurisdiction over the underlying controversy.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:42 am to ColoradoAg
The SEC will not shoot themselves by voting out LSU or imposing harsh sanctions
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:43 am to memphisplaya
quote:
Do you think one Federal judge In North Alabama is gonna have the final say so over LSU, Kiffin and the state of Louisiana?
LOL.
He'll the final say so on what the SEC and 15 of its members wants to do in regards to running it's conference...not one rougue,out of control member.
This isn't gonna end well for LSU.They'd be well advised to cut their losses TODAY. If not,the only place they'll find a home is the BIG XII
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News