Started By
Message
re: As the Tide recedes: **Update** Dawkins on tape discussing payment to Bama players
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:05 pm to ReauxlTide222
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:05 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:Im not being a dick, do you really not get this?
Expose Alabama for what?
You have an individual under oath admitting to paying bama players. Thus setting Bama up for playing ineligible players thus forfeiting all games with said players, also setting up the University for a lack of institutional control penalties
This post was edited on 4/23/19 at 4:06 pm
3
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:06 pm to TTsTowel
quote:When that one initially made the rounds, the tweet below it was from some random who tagged DJ saying "Is DJ Fluker retarded or something because he looks special", to which DJ replied "say what dude?" I laughed my arse off for a good while at that one.
I remember that. 100% not photoshopped, either. I had a screenshot saved on imageshack when it happened that I personally took.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:06 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Tuscaloosa, I would like your thoughts. You seem to be every astute with how these federal trials go
My thoughts are that the NCAA statute of limitations is 4 years and I couldn't care any less about this.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:07 pm to elposter
I troll a lot on this board but I’m being serious. He was dumb enough to tweet that.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:08 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
So no answer
In the spirit of the new Jeopardy Phenom...
I will take all things GUMP for $200 Alex.
Nick Saban is said to be retiring and and Alabama went in a downward spiral due to this infraction.
What is, BAMA WAS CAUGHT IN A FEDERAL TRIAL PAYING COLLEGE FOOTBALL PLAYERS?
Correct!!!!
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:08 pm to lsupride87
quote:
You have an individual under oath admitting to paying bama players. Thus setting Bama up for playing ineligible players thus forfeiting all games with said players, also setting up the University for a lack of institutional control penalties
Statute of Limitations.
Bama is untouchable.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:08 pm to lsupride87
quote:What did the NCAA do to the 2 Auburn kids who got paid?
Im not being a dick, do you really not get this?
You have an individual under oath admitting to paying bama players. Thus setting Bama up for playing ineligible players thus forfeiting all games with said players, also setting up the University for a lack of institutional control penalties
Lack of institutional control....
One second..
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:08 pm to lsupride87
quote:
ou have an individual under oath admitting to paying bama players. Thus setting Bama up for playing ineligible players thus forfeiting all games with said players, also setting up the University for a lack of institutional control penalties
This statement is the most predictable mashup of wishful thinking and jumping to conclusions that I’ve ever heard
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:09 pm to Tuscaloosa
This post was edited on 4/23/19 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:09 pm to azcatiger
quote:Were they?
BAMA WAS CAUGHT IN A FEDERAL TRIAL PAYING COLLEGE FOOTBALL PLAYERS?
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:10 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
What's the need for offers, taped conversations or text messages when a live witness gives his testimony under oath in a Federal court case?
quote:I won't lie, it piqued my interest.
As I said earlier, this is the one thing that would concern me.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:10 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:10 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
My thoughts are that the NCAA statute of limitations is 4 years
Your thoughts are misleading you.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:11 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:So I see you struggle with understanding NCAA regulations as much as you do federal ones
My thoughts are that the NCAA statute of limitations is 4 years
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:11 pm to RT1941
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:12 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Bama is untouchable.
Saban is no Elliot Ness. And no one knows this guy does not have evidence more recent. So you may be right.....But you may be wrong. Don't be so certain about something you don't fully know about.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:12 pm to lsupride87
My only response to this thread is “uh-oh”. Welp, at least it looks like Wade is off the hook
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:12 pm to pankReb
quote:
Your thoughts are misleading you.
No, they're not. There would need to be a continued string of allegations that stretch into the current 4 year period.
As it stands - with no coaches or boosters involved, there's not a damn thing that can be done about something that occurred 2010-2014.
Sorry.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 4:13 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:Not really
This statement is the most predictable mashup of wishful thinking and jumping to conclusions that I’ve ever heard
I made two assumptions:
1. Blazer is not lying under oath and further incriminating himself for no reason
2. The paid players actually played
Page 14 of 38
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News