Started By
Message

All 27 supplements issued by Clemson tested negative. Clears Clemson.

Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:42 pm
Posted by Clemson81to85
Member since May 2019
21 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:42 pm
I guess all the fuss about Clemson knowingly or unknowingly dispensing the substance is out the window. At least we can put to rest that all of the supplements Clemson approved and administered tested negative.

According to Galloway’ and Giella’s lawyer, who released a written statement on Friday, players’ assertions were confirmed by a polygraph examination taken by each. Both student-athletes had negative test results for prohibited substances in multiple urine drug screens in April and October of 2018, just before their positive December 2018 test, and again in both January and February of 2019, just after the December positive test.

Their representative, Robert Ariail, points out in the players’ statement that Ostarine is a known contaminant of legitimate products. As part of the appeal, the student-athletes presented statements from scientific experts which confirmed that the very low levels detected in December 2018 were indicative of contamination of legitimate products.

A medical review committee of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) recently recommended that in cases such as this, no positive findings be made. Similarly, the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) has, in recent months, lifted the previously imposed suspensions against five athletes who tested positive for trace levels of Ostarine.

The WADA report also noted that in many cases, the identification of the contaminated product is not possible. The students’ scientific expert stated that Ostarine can remain in one’s system for an indeterminate amount of time, making it even more difficult to pinpoint the source of contamination.

In the December 2018 instance, the student-athletes were unable to identify the source of contamination. As part of the appeal process, an independent lab tested 27 supplements and products, and none came back as contaminated.
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
43950 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:44 pm to

This post was edited on 5/24/19 at 2:48 pm
Posted by Drewbie
tFlagship
Member since Jun 2012
57589 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:46 pm to
Great, another alter.
Posted by GatorBait24
Pensacola
Member since Jul 2016
5380 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:46 pm to
We don’t care.
Posted by ForeverLSU5
Member since Mar 2019
1971 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 2:56 pm to
ACC Board
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
23831 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

According to Galloway’ and Giella’s lawyer, who released a written statement on Friday, players’ assertions were confirmed by a polygraph examination taken by each. Both student-athletes had negative test results for prohibited substances in multiple urine drug screens in April and October of 2018, just before their positive December 2018 test, and again in both January and February of 2019, just after the December positive test.



In other words, they messed up the timing of their off cycle.
Posted by CaptainPanic
18.44311,-64.764021
Member since Sep 2011
25582 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:00 pm to
Thank you for bringing SEC content to an SEC message board.
Posted by GoblinGuide
Member since Nov 2017
1541 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:04 pm to
81to85? That was the point when Clemson had their previous PED/steroid scandal I believe. This guy might be an expert.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
23831 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:05 pm to
Also, somebody somewhere is lying.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30807 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

All 27 supplements issued by Clemson tested negative.


I don't think you understand how this works.

quote:

players’ assertions were confirmed by a polygraph examination taken by each


A massive waste of money. Any practiced story will beat a polygraph.
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
12141 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:14 pm to
So clempson couldn't have given the ped under the table? Like clempson would offer up the drug to be tested just so they would be blamed. Another idiot tator.

Also no one gives a crap.
This post was edited on 5/24/19 at 3:17 pm
Posted by AllInAllTheTime
Member since Apr 2019
336 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:21 pm to
Obviously you do or you wouldn’t have read or replied!
Posted by CFFreak
Rjyh, AL
Member since May 2019
8765 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:27 pm to
Agreed. Nothing to see here.

Clemson is the champ and there is nothing anyone can do about it.
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2297 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:28 pm to
The negative tests actually make things worse. If the Ostarine did not come from contaminated products, then they must have taken it on purpose.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:29 pm to
Yep. This happens all the time in MMA when a fighter tests positive for something and then they claim it was a tainted supplement.
Posted by Icoachfb
Greenville SC
Member since Jan 2019
1796 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:32 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/24/19 at 3:34 pm
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
23831 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

Yep. This happens all the time in MMA when a fighter tests positive for something and then they claim it was a tainted supplement.


Not just MMA...

LINK
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:38 pm to
And he's FOS, just like most MMA fighters.
Posted by Dice22
Member since Jun 2016
117 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:43 pm to
OP probably thinks Jon Jones is a good guy who would never cheat. But muh picograms.
Posted by deaux
Member since Oct 2018
20267 posts
Posted on 5/24/19 at 3:45 pm to
Literally no one here cares
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter