Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:21
Registered on:5/24/2019
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: ND vs UGA - overrated win?

Posted by Clemson81to85 on 9/23/19 at 10:34 am
quote:

The Irish looked really slow on both sides of the ball and their qb stared down his targets. So for Uga to barely win, this is definitely an overrated win.



30-3 victory over Notre Dame in Cotton Bowl = Clemson got a bye in the semi and didn't have to play anyone.


23-17 hang on for dear life at home = Greatest win over a traditional power ever!
You had Tennessee in a "big 6" before Saturday? I would have thought three straight double digit losses to Vandy would keep them from any kind of big 6.

quote:

Watching games and looking at Stadium pictures this weekend showed a lot of empty seats. The era of full stadiums is over. People will decide to go or not to go on a week to week basis.



Sounds like its time to lower ticket prices.
quote:

Not with that schedule.




LOL, South Carolina hasn't been able to win against anyone on the ACC schedule. One thing we can't do about our schedule vs your schedule is we play South Carolina and you play Clemson.
quote:

Since you brought up history here is some history on clempson cheating



And here's your history lesson. By the way, somebody needs to eexplain to Utah poster about Fits News. While they're at it tell the poor guy about self reported secondary violations. He thought he had a headline that day, LOL. But here's your history lesson and a headline.

A few years ago when Southern California was placed on probation. Some people were surprised by the severity of the penalties (only USC fans, really). But in the report released by the NCAA, it was directly noted that the USC football program had previously been placed on probation five times since the early 1950s. I’m sure USC’s repeat violations had some impact on the severity of the penalties they received in 2010.

Listed below are the current FBS schools that have been placed on probation, in which the school’s football team was somehow involved. It’s important to keep in mind that violations in other sports often bring attention to a school’s entire athletic program. Sometimes the football violations paled in comparison to violations in other sports, but if the football program was involved I still listed them (i.e. Baylor’s probation from 2005-09).

College Football (FBS) Programs That Have Been Sanctioned the Most

Note: The count includes seasons not yet completed (i.e. USC 2012-2013).
Rk School Seasons Sanctioned
1 Southern Methodist (TX) 17 7
2 Southern California 15 6
3 Auburn (AL) 11 4
4t Alabama 10 3
4t Michigan St. 10 3
4t Oklahoma 10 5
7t Colorado 9 5
7t Illinois 9 5
7t Texas A&M 9 4
7t Wisconsin 9 4
11t Arizona St. 8 4
11t California 8 3
11t Cincinnati (OH) 8 4
11t Kansas 8 4
11t Kansas St. 8 4
11t Miami (FL) 8 3
11t Oklahoma St. 8 2
11t South Carolina 8 3
19t Florida Intl 7 2
19t Houston (TX) 7 3
19t Memphis (TN) 7 3
19t Mississippi 7 3
19t Mississippi St. 7 3
19t Ohio St. 7 3
19t Texas Tech 7 3

Notes

Since 1953, the year the NCAA instituted penalties, Southern Methodist has spent 29% of their seasons on probation. By 2013, Southern California will have spent 25% of their seasons on probation.

The 2012 season, will be Florida International’s first season off of probation since they joined the Sun Belt Conference in 2005.

Schools that are currently from the SEC have been sanctioned 35 times, for a total of 77 seasons; the most by any conference in the FBS.

College Football (FBS) and NCAA Probation by Conference

Note: The count includes seasons not yet completed (i.e. USC 2012-2013).
Conference Sanctioned Seasons
Atlantic Coast 18 38
Big 12 25 56
Big East 8 14
Big Ten 21 48
Conference USA 22 51
Independents 2 3
Mid-American 3 4
Mountain West 6 12
Pac-12 31 64
Southeastern 35 77
Sun Belt 5 13
Western Athletic 3 8

The bowl ban is one of the most severe penalties the NCAA can hand out. Since 1953, the NCAA has handed out a total of 80 bowl bans to current FBS schools.

Auburn and Southern Methodist are tied for the most years of bowl bans; nine bowl bans in total.

College Football (FBS) Programs That Have Received the Most Bowl Bans

Rk School Years Bowl Bans
1t Auburn (AL) 9 4
1t Southern Methodist (TX) 9 5
3 Southern California 6 4
4t Florida 5 3
4t Houston (TX) 5 2
4t Kansas St. 5 2
4t Miami (FL) 5 3
4t Oklahoma 5 3
4t Oklahoma St. 5 2
10t Indiana 4 1
10t North Carolina St. 4 1
10t Texas A&M 4 4
10t UCLA 4 2
14t Alabama 3 2
14t Arizona St. 3 3
14t California 3 2
14t Colorado 3 2
14t Illinois 3 2
14t Kansas 3 3
14t Kentucky 3 3
14t Michigan St. 3 1
14t Mississippi 3 2
14t Mississippi St. 3 2
14t Tulsa (OK) 3 1
quote:

What the hell would they when they can breeze through the charmin-soft ACC and go 12-0 year after year? Being in the SEC would cost them shots at the natty some years.



Not every year. In 2016, to win the natty, we had to go through an ACC that went 10-4 vs the SEC, including a near sweep on rivalry Saturday. And besides, even if it were a league full of Vandy, that's not always a gimme, being a Tennessee fan, you should know that. I mean three straight by double digits and two by mmore than two touchdowns.

017/01/09 Clemson 35 - Alabama 31 W !! CFP Championship !!
2016/12/31 Louisville 9 - LSU 29 L !! Citrus Bowl !!
2016/12/31 Georgia Tech 33 - Kentucky 18 W !! TaxSlayer Bowl !!
2016/12/29 Virginia Tech 35 - Arkansas 24 W !! Belk Bowl !!
2016/12/26 North Carolina St 41 - Vanderbilt 17 W !! Independence Bowl !!
2016/11/26 Clemson 56 - South Carolina 7 W
2016/11/26 Louisville 38 - Kentucky 41 L
2016/11/26 Georgia Tech 28 - Georgia 27 W
2016/11/26 Florida St 31 - Florida 13 W
2016/09/17 Georgia Tech 38 - Vanderbilt 7 W
2016/09/10 Virginia Tech 24 - Tennessee 45 L
2016/09/05 Florida St 45 - Mississippi 34 W
2016/09/03 North Carolina 24 - Georgia 33 L
2016/09/03 Clemson 19 - Auburn 13 W


I'll give you that the ACC was down for out 2018 National Title, but just might have been the toughest league for our 2016 National Title. At least that was the buzz after the season and bowls that year. Remember, FSU beat Michigan in the Orange Bowl that year and had beaten Florida for many years straight.


And since you say every year, that would include a lot of years. Tennessee is 5-5 in its last 10 games vs the ACC, that's not exactly a cake walk.

2017/09/04 Tennessee 42 - Georgia Tech 41 W OT
2016/09/10 Tennessee 45 - Virginia Tech 24 W
2012/08/31 Tennessee 35 - North Carolina St 21 W
2010/12/30 Tennessee 27 - North Carolina 30 L OT !! Music City Bowl !!
2009/12/31 Tennessee 14 - Virginia Tech 37 L !! Chick-fil-A Bowl !!
2004/01/02 Tennessee 14 - Clemson 27 L !! Peach Bowl !!
2003/11/01 Tennessee 23 - Duke 6 W
2002/12/31 Tennessee 3 - Maryland 30 L !! Peach Bowl !!

It's easier to talk than actually play the games, even vs the ACC.
I Didn't come up with this so I have to credit a fellow Clemson fan, but is it Roll Tired, or Roll Damn Tired?

re: Clemson cheating again.

Posted by Clemson81to85 on 8/8/19 at 11:10 am
You can't be that dumb. I always dread this day when the self-reported secondary violations come out. Every single school has them and most have much more than 8. But when you're the champ, it makes every paper in every little podunk town and the major websites. For example, South Carolina reported 22 last year, don''t know if this year's has come out for them. Bama reported 16 this year. Usually schools have much more than 8 and every single school self-reports these secondary violations at some point in the summer. And there are always a few idiots that have no clue that this is reported by every school

LINK /


LINK

LINK /

And then some are not secondary. See Below:

LINK
quote:

He just cares about being drafted



Which means he won't play in your bowl at all. He will decline.
Virginia Tech wants to know where you guys went. You left them standing all alone in the second half in Charlotte. I thought only one of your players had to skip town in a hurry.

quote:

You mean the last 5 years? Congrat's! That is mostly due to Clemson & FSU being 9-1 vs SC and Fla over that period, but that is changing. You want to break down numbers with interconference play? Here you go sweet tits. NCAA Interconference records since 1998



Florida, LOL, with the all time 105-98-13 record against the current ACC teams. 105-99-13 if you want to count Notre Dame. Good thing you played Wake 4 times, which Georgia, who is 1-2 vs the Deacs, can't say.
And, by the way, 9-1 vs Florida and South Carolina should never ever happen, under any circumstances, if the SEC is as dominant as you claim.
quote:

an average Georgia team beat Clemson in 2014 with Deshaun Watson, sorry you're insecure about your overrated team. Many of the same players on that Clemson team went to win the championship. Your team is trash, your conference is an absolute joke and you'll fall arse backwards into the playoff this year while Georgia and Bama have another heavy weight fight. I almost feel sorry for your bored fan base. A&M is going to beat you this year anyway.



You should know good and well that was Watson's very first game. Not only did he not start, but he only played two series, leading the team down the field in one of them. That was on the coaching staff that he didn't play more. He didn't start until the fourth game of the season. The year before we beat you guys 38-35 and it was 38-28 before giving up a garbage prevent td with seconds remaining. Had to listen to Georgia fans cry over a blown field goal as if that was the difference, when we missed our own field goal. The score was closer than the game. And that one was after the whole nation had to listen to Georgia cry all off-season about Richt not clocking the ball vs Bama and how they should have won the natty.

I think Georgia fans are the most butt hurt at Clemson winning a third national title because it just points out how underachieving Georgia has been, not to mention flat out blowing titles in 2012 and 2017. Stop choking games to Bama.
quote:

all respectively lose to Texas, Miami, Clemson, and Oregon??? It could conceivably happen (but, not likely). If it does, good grief, are we going to hear about it here like nothing else. But, it's also conceivable that the SEC teams could make it a sweep. Currently, LSU, Florida, and Auburn are favored to win. A&M is only a 12.5 pt underdog at Clemson (generally give 6 pts for the home team, so that's pretty close). Is this more a testament to A&M being a legitimate threat this year (I think they are) or to Clemson's defense, which is playing at home with some new faces on the D side?


If that happened, the SEC would go from 26-28 against the ACC in the playoff era to 26-30 vs the ACC in the playoff era.
quote:

Moses is a Moron. He sucked in the NCG. He should be the last person flapping his gums.



Easy for him to say what he said six months and ten days later, in a hotel conference room, sipping on iced tea, instead of punting from midfield with 10 minutes to go, trailing by 28, or praying for Dabo to take a knee with first down at the five, 35 seconds and two timeouts in Santa Clara.
quote:

Clemson is so overrated, they play nobody all year and then beat their chest when they have one good game. All your d-lineman are gone now, time to come back down to earth



And Georgia plays three decent teams all year, losses to all three, gets blown out of two, and cries for six months about not making the playoffs. After 39 years, you're officially a one hit wonder.
quote:

SEC talks about SEC
ACC talks about SEC lol



SEC media days did more talking about Clemson than they did South Carolina. Mostly talking about Clemson/Bama.

But high five to you for trying.
quote:

Some of you Bammers are something else. The previous two games Clemson and Bama met in the title game, Clemson had the tougher draw, and the year the two met in the semi-final game, Bama did not have to play in their conference championship game, effectively giving extra time to prepare. Yet, I don't recall most Clemson fans making such a constant excuse about it. To the contrary, Clemson fans readily admit Bama reamed us in the 2018 semi-final game.

Also, yes -Bama was having success running the ball early and would likely have been better served had they stayed with it. That said, I don't think they could have out scored a deep team that was used to playing the majority of the roster in every game. The 'ship game ended with a 10 minute 90+ yard coronation march that ended with the mercy knee. Perhaps Bama should have similarly developed roster depth when they were blowing away teams during the regular season.

Excuses carry much more weight following nail biters as opposed to blow-outs.



SO true. The one that really gets me is the crying about having to play Oklahoma in the heat and humidity of Miami, while we got to play indoors in Dallas. In 2015 we beat Oklahoma in the heat and humidity of Miami, while Bama played indoors in Dallas. And Michigan State was one of the easiest draws ever. We lost by 5 in the title game, but never crossed my mind to use the semi game humidity as an excuse. Then comes the part about Notre Dame this year being an easier semi opponent than Okahoma was for Bama this year. Hmmm, I'm not sure Notre Dame was an easier opponent than Bama, much less Oklahoma. Then comes the ACC schedule allowing us a year of rest. Bama won their games by a larger margin than we did. They should have been very well rested. I had heard the CBS crews talking about Tua never getting to play in the 4th quarter. If our regular season schedule was easy, then the postseason was easier as the margin of victory was larger in Charlotte, Dallas and Santa Clara than the regular season. Then there is the tried and true conference championship game excuse. WE played Pitt, while they played Georgia. As you said, the previous year they didn't have to play a conference championship game at all. We lost by 18 and I never even dreamed of using that as an excuse. Again, as you said, excuses might apply in a close loss, but a four touchdown, take a 1st down knee at the five with 35 seconds and two timeouts loss, not hardly.
To their credit, most of these excuses came weeks and months later after some thought. The day after the game, they were pretty much saying woodshed, which was a better look. Alabama is a great program and the standard bearer. These excuses are beneath them. They are probably a couple of weeks shy of being closer to their next national championship than they are to the Santa Clara debacle.
All 27 supplements used by the athletic department tested negative. That may be why the appeal failed. See Below:


"In the December 2018 instance, the student-athletes were unable to identify the source of contamination. As part of the appeal process, an independent lab tested 27 supplements and products, and none came back as contaminated."
Looks like Dabo was wrong. All 27 supplements used by Clemson tested negative.
I guess all the fuss about Clemson knowingly or unknowingly dispensing the substance is out the window. At least we can put to rest that all of the supplements Clemson approved and administered tested negative.

According to Galloway’ and Giella’s lawyer, who released a written statement on Friday, players’ assertions were confirmed by a polygraph examination taken by each. Both student-athletes had negative test results for prohibited substances in multiple urine drug screens in April and October of 2018, just before their positive December 2018 test, and again in both January and February of 2019, just after the December positive test.

Their representative, Robert Ariail, points out in the players’ statement that Ostarine is a known contaminant of legitimate products. As part of the appeal, the student-athletes presented statements from scientific experts which confirmed that the very low levels detected in December 2018 were indicative of contamination of legitimate products.

A medical review committee of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) recently recommended that in cases such as this, no positive findings be made. Similarly, the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) has, in recent months, lifted the previously imposed suspensions against five athletes who tested positive for trace levels of Ostarine.

The WADA report also noted that in many cases, the identification of the contaminated product is not possible. The students’ scientific expert stated that Ostarine can remain in one’s system for an indeterminate amount of time, making it even more difficult to pinpoint the source of contamination.

In the December 2018 instance, the student-athletes were unable to identify the source of contamination. As part of the appeal process, an independent lab tested 27 supplements and products, and none came back as contaminated.