Started By
Message
re: Alabama: Greatest CFB Dynasty according to Vegas
Posted on 10/9/14 at 9:18 pm to Tuscaloosa
Posted on 10/9/14 at 9:18 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:I will be exponentially more nervous about that game if Lawson still hasn't suited up by then. Sims is a great QB and right now we just down have the four-man pass rush to disrupt him, and the last thing I want to see is Johnson having to blitz a backer or DB anytime he wants to get pressure; y'all are too talented on offense for that.
I just hope we keep it close.
0
Posted on 10/9/14 at 9:19 pm to Tuscaloosa
K
Posted on 10/9/14 at 9:19 pm to Tuscaloosa
Posted on 10/9/14 at 9:19 pm to The Green_Bastard
quote:
This reeks of insecurity. Ya'd think that 3 titles in 4 years would put you above seeking tSECrant's approval
Look at the bright side....we went 4 whole days without having one bama blow me thread. Vegas had the O/U at 3 1/2 days.
Posted on 10/9/14 at 9:21 pm to Tuscaloosa
I'm pretty sure a dynasty needs more than 2 sec titles in 15 years.
Posted on 10/9/14 at 9:21 pm to Tuscaloosa
Yet they are only 4-3 in their last 7 games and have lost 3 straight games against ranked opponents
Posted on 10/9/14 at 9:23 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
Vegas had the O/U at 3 1/2 days.
I got my bet in when it was still at 4.5.
Posted on 10/9/14 at 9:23 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
Yet they are only 4-3 in their last 7 games and have lost 3 straight games against ranked opponents
Crazy, right?
Posted on 10/9/14 at 9:24 pm to JaxTiger10
quote:
I'm pretty sure a dynasty needs more than 2 sec titles in 15 years.
Well, seeing as how the parameters used were the last 60 games - I don't think that's super relevant.
Posted on 10/9/14 at 9:26 pm to Tuscaloosa
Yeah. Its relevant. Youre not a dynasty if youve only won your conf twice since sophomores in highschool were born.
This post was edited on 10/9/14 at 9:27 pm
Posted on 10/9/14 at 9:29 pm to JaxTiger10
quote:
Yeah. Its relevant. Youre not a dynasty if youve only won your conf twice since sophomores in highschool were born.
Neat.
You should write an angry e-mail to ESPN and those big dumb executive directors of the Vegas sports books and make sure they know this important information that they surely missed.
Posted on 10/9/14 at 9:29 pm to auburnphan23
What do you call it when a team has lost 15 games in the last 3 years and thinks its a dynasty?
Actually 16.
Actually 16.
This post was edited on 10/9/14 at 9:30 pm
Posted on 10/9/14 at 9:36 pm to Othello
Multiple dynasties across human history were deposed at one point or another, only to regain power 
Athenian tyrants did it all the time, too
Athenian tyrants did it all the time, too
Posted on 10/9/14 at 9:37 pm to Othello
I never claimed Auburn was a dynasty. However, Auburn has only lost 16 games since 2010. If you went back to that point, the only reason Alabama would have a better record is because of Chizik's last year in 2012
Posted on 10/9/14 at 9:38 pm to JaxTiger10
Arbitrary parameters are arbitrary.
Posted on 10/9/14 at 10:03 pm to Tuscaloosa
Tidefans.com is missing you, please return back to that site
Posted on 10/9/14 at 10:06 pm to Tuscaloosa
Posted on 10/9/14 at 10:45 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
You should write an angry e-mail to ESPN and those big dumb executive directors of the Vegas sports books and make sure they know this important information that they surely missed.
Common knowledge.
Posted on 10/9/14 at 10:52 pm to JaxTiger10
Was Bama really favored in the 2010 Iron Bowl? I know they were at home, but they were 9-2 and Auburn was 11-0 with Cam Newton on fire.
Posted on 10/10/14 at 8:08 am to NOTORlOUSD
quote:
Was Bama really favored in the 2010 Iron Bowl?
Bama opened a 3.5 favorite and the lined moved all the way up to 5 on some books.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News