Started By
Message
re: 89% of aggy students vote to bring back TEXAS game
Posted on 2/23/19 at 1:46 pm to Cheese Grits
Posted on 2/23/19 at 1:46 pm to Cheese Grits
Dumb or crazy.. both?
You slid from "national" and "media" to some bastardized version of regional, historical ranking & recruiting.
I read it a third time in a 4th grade level Cajun accent & that shite still doesnt make sense.
You slid from "national" and "media" to some bastardized version of regional, historical ranking & recruiting.
I read it a third time in a 4th grade level Cajun accent & that shite still doesnt make sense.
2
Posted on 2/23/19 at 1:47 pm to Montgomery Hill
So to summarize
1. 89% of A&M students, who actually voted, voted for the game, which is below the 94% share that the whorns students voted for.
2. Texas has been a full level or two below A&M in the 7 yrs since A&M joined the SEC on the field. Back-to-Back-to-Back-to-back 6 or 7 loss seasons is something else. In fact that has happened at A&M in my lifetime so i wouldn't know.
3. Texas needs a home game that people will show up for. We have LSU or Alabama at home every season, and unlike big 12 schools, SEC schools actually travel to road games (H/T to the SEC West for supporting your schools)
4. Texas thinks they are entitled to dictate when and how the game returns. The reality is they dont, our school president has already said it won't be anytime soon, and this is just a stupid discussion to pass time during EVERY offseason.
I will congratulate the whorns on scheduling LSU. They'll finally see why SEC home games are fun. It's nice to see the opposing team actually use their allotment. No big 12 team consistently did.
1. 89% of A&M students, who actually voted, voted for the game, which is below the 94% share that the whorns students voted for.
2. Texas has been a full level or two below A&M in the 7 yrs since A&M joined the SEC on the field. Back-to-Back-to-Back-to-back 6 or 7 loss seasons is something else. In fact that has happened at A&M in my lifetime so i wouldn't know.
3. Texas needs a home game that people will show up for. We have LSU or Alabama at home every season, and unlike big 12 schools, SEC schools actually travel to road games (H/T to the SEC West for supporting your schools)
4. Texas thinks they are entitled to dictate when and how the game returns. The reality is they dont, our school president has already said it won't be anytime soon, and this is just a stupid discussion to pass time during EVERY offseason.
I will congratulate the whorns on scheduling LSU. They'll finally see why SEC home games are fun. It's nice to see the opposing team actually use their allotment. No big 12 team consistently did.
Posted on 2/23/19 at 1:47 pm to Montgomery Hill
Nice deflection....
Georgia Tech is a academic school that does well at football without the money or recruits Utx has.
Nice of you to cherrypick the pre poll era less that record against Vanderbilt looks too embarrassing.
As for GT, they could claim at least 7 but just claim 4 (HoF coaches in BOLD)
The 1917 MNC was with a coach named Johnny Heisman, ever heard of him?
The 1928 MNC was capped with 10 -0 and a Rose Bowl win under Alexander
The 1952 MNC was capped with 12 -0 and a Sugar Bowl win under Dodd
The 1990 MNC was well past the DKR era and was Coaches Poll
I get Utx was too chickens*t to stay and play in the old SIAA and chose to wreck the SWC and now the B12 because they can't get their way. What a bunch of crybabies in austin when somebody outside of the state sees you for what you are.
Georgia Tech is a academic school that does well at football without the money or recruits Utx has.
Nice of you to cherrypick the pre poll era less that record against Vanderbilt looks too embarrassing.
As for GT, they could claim at least 7 but just claim 4 (HoF coaches in BOLD)
The 1917 MNC was with a coach named Johnny Heisman, ever heard of him?
The 1928 MNC was capped with 10 -0 and a Rose Bowl win under Alexander
The 1952 MNC was capped with 12 -0 and a Sugar Bowl win under Dodd
The 1990 MNC was well past the DKR era and was Coaches Poll
I get Utx was too chickens*t to stay and play in the old SIAA and chose to wreck the SWC and now the B12 because they can't get their way. What a bunch of crybabies in austin when somebody outside of the state sees you for what you are.
Posted on 2/23/19 at 1:52 pm to OldSchoolHorn
quote:
Dumb or crazy.. both?
You slid from "national" and "media" to some bastardized version of regional, historical ranking & recruiting.
I read it a third time in a 4th grade level Cajun accent & that shite still doesnt make sense.
He is a Kentucky Fan....
Posted on 2/23/19 at 1:54 pm to Cheese Grits
Texas made a decision as a state to leave the SIAA.
A lot of it had to do with Spindletop and finding oil in Southeast Texas.
But Texas started to wrap themselves in Texan Pride and their war against Mexico and attempted to cut ties with what they referred to as the loser mentality in the Lower South.
A lot of it had to do with Spindletop and finding oil in Southeast Texas.
But Texas started to wrap themselves in Texan Pride and their war against Mexico and attempted to cut ties with what they referred to as the loser mentality in the Lower South.
Posted on 2/23/19 at 1:57 pm to lsufball19
quote:
Why not cancel one of your directional state schools? Why does it always have to be Notre Dame or Clemson? There’s 3 other OOC games on the schedule every year.
As entertaining as it would be to play nothing but P5 schools it’s makes zero sense to plays the SEC W, UofsC, rotational SECE, a big time OOC, and then tu with the current playoff system.
Let me know when Lsu or Bama schedule 2 top 10 teams ooc in the same year.
Posted on 2/23/19 at 2:02 pm to Montgomery Hill
You don’t schedule another team when there’s a 70% chance of losing. These two teams wil not be playing again in our lifetime. Move on.
Posted on 2/23/19 at 2:02 pm to tiger perry
quote:
Come on Aggies. Man up and play the game
You.
We're good.
And, no amount of shaming or guilting will change our resolve.
If they agree to play every game at kyle and we get 100% of the proceeds and an all-Aggie officiating crew IN PURPETUITY, then MAYBE we will put their insufferable asses back on the schedule. Otherwise...frick OFF!!!!
Posted on 2/23/19 at 2:04 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:also, only if they let whomever is coaching A&M taze whomever is coaching texas at midfield before the kickoff of every game
If they agree to play every game at kyle and we get 100% of the proceeds and an all-Aggie officiating crew IN PURPETUITY, then MAYBE we will put their insufferable asses back on the schedule.
This post was edited on 2/23/19 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 2/23/19 at 2:05 pm to Poncho and Lefty
The game is meaningless.
Using Aggy logic.
Texas would rather play ND, USC, LSU, Alabama, Michigan, Ohio St and Georgia.
Probably Penn State after the Georgia home and home.
Texas has only 3 OOC
So they play those schools plus Rice 4 times a decade.
That leaves Texas with only 6 open dates every decade.
Texas is willing to play A&M but with a home and home.
Nothing long term.
aggy on the otherhand is all over the map because they attempt to spin everything as a win.
Using Aggy logic.
Texas would rather play ND, USC, LSU, Alabama, Michigan, Ohio St and Georgia.
Probably Penn State after the Georgia home and home.
Texas has only 3 OOC
So they play those schools plus Rice 4 times a decade.
That leaves Texas with only 6 open dates every decade.
Texas is willing to play A&M but with a home and home.
Nothing long term.
aggy on the otherhand is all over the map because they attempt to spin everything as a win.
Posted on 2/23/19 at 2:06 pm to Montgomery Hill
quote:
all over the map because they attempt to spin everything as a win.
quote:
Montgomery Hill
Posted on 2/23/19 at 2:07 pm to WestCoastAg
And kick him in the nuts after halftime.
But, only maybe...
And after they surender the entire PUF and the longhorn moniker to officially become the "teasippers". And they suck Aggie dick on command.
But, only maybe...
And after they surender the entire PUF and the longhorn moniker to officially become the "teasippers". And they suck Aggie dick on command.
Posted on 2/23/19 at 2:07 pm to OldSchoolHorn
OK, here is about as simple as it gets.
Outside the state of TX, rank the teams by ELITE status.....
Oklahoma = 7 claimed (10 unclaimed) 3 coaches over 4 decades
Nebraska = 5 claimed (9 unclaimed) 2 coaches over 2 decades
Texas = 4 claimed (5 unclaimed) 2 coaches over 2 decades
Arkansas = 1 claimed (1 unclaimed) 1 coach over single decade
Texas A&M = 3 claimed (0 unclaimed) All before WWII and Bible also coached UNL and Utx
Outside the state of TX, rank the teams by ELITE status.....
Oklahoma = 7 claimed (10 unclaimed) 3 coaches over 4 decades
Nebraska = 5 claimed (9 unclaimed) 2 coaches over 2 decades
Texas = 4 claimed (5 unclaimed) 2 coaches over 2 decades
Arkansas = 1 claimed (1 unclaimed) 1 coach over single decade
Texas A&M = 3 claimed (0 unclaimed) All before WWII and Bible also coached UNL and Utx
Posted on 2/23/19 at 2:07 pm to Montgomery Hill
quote:
He is a Kentucky Fan....
give or take a few teeth &/or IQ points it's all the same.
Posted on 2/23/19 at 2:07 pm to KaiserSoze99
I think we are making some real progress here
Posted on 2/23/19 at 2:08 pm to Montgomery Hill
quote:
The game is meaningless
So, tell your alter ego to stop making threads about it, Randy.
Posted on 2/23/19 at 2:08 pm to Cheese Grits
Aint gonna happen. We dont need you.
Posted on 2/23/19 at 2:09 pm to Cheese Grits
quote:
OK, here is about as simple as it gets.
Outside the state of TX, rank the teams by ELITE status.....
Oklahoma = 7 claimed (10 unclaimed) 3 coaches over 4 decades
Nebraska = 5 claimed (9 unclaimed) 2 coaches over 2 decades
Texas = 4 claimed (5 unclaimed) 2 coaches over 2 decades
Arkansas = 1 claimed (1 unclaimed) 1 coach over single decade
Texas A&M = 3 claimed (0 unclaimed) All before WWII and Bible also coached UNL and Utx
Since Texas has a commanding winning record against them all and have 906 wins I will go with Texas....
Posted on 2/23/19 at 2:11 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
So, tell your alter ego to stop making threads about it, Randy
That is not even Randolph....
Randolph has his own account on here.
Randolph hits up Twitter because it has a wider auidence.
Posted on 2/23/19 at 2:11 pm to Montgomery Hill
quote:
auidence
Page 6 of 15
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News