Started By
Message
re: 6’ Diego Pavia is actually 5’9”
Posted on 1/26/26 at 2:42 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
Posted on 1/26/26 at 2:42 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
quote:
5'10", 200 lbs... Been there, don't recommend.
5’10, 200lbs is perfectly fine, if you’re not a fat arse. Most running backs are in that range, or heavier.
Posted on 1/26/26 at 2:52 pm to TigerScorpion
quote:
5’10, 200lbs is perfectly fine, if you’re not a fat arse.
No thanks. Running about 180-185 now, would love to get it 165-170.
Not a brag, just a goal. Y'all can have that mass shite.
Posted on 1/26/26 at 3:01 pm to genro
quote:
For many decades it was the Netherlands.
Can confirm. Took a trip to Normandy and Holland in September 2019to visit the D-Day and Market Garden battlefields. If you're single and you're into tall, blonde, fit girls then the Netherlands is for you. They bike everywhere so they stay in shape. Just blue-eyed blonde babe after another. Oh, to be young again...
Posted on 1/26/26 at 3:05 pm to hawgfaninc
2-deep tables have always been FOS.
We can make fun of him for shites & giggles, but the kid had a hell of a season. We talkin Vandy.
We can make fun of him for shites & giggles, but the kid had a hell of a season. We talkin Vandy.
Posted on 1/26/26 at 3:18 pm to TigerScorpion
quote:
5’10, 200lbs is perfectly fine, if you’re not a fat arse. Most running backs are in that range, or heavier.
5-10, 230. 300+ bench, 400+ squat, swim like a fish. Low BP, cholesterol, and pulse. F all that skinny twig shite.
Posted on 1/26/26 at 3:28 pm to The Pirate King
quote:Different sport, but go back and find some early listings for Charles Barkley when he was at Auburn. I swear he was posted at 6-7 to 6-9, since he was a "power forward".
He's effectively 5'10. 2 inches for cleats. Not that crazy of a jump. There's been some players who tack on like 4-5.
Dude's actually under 6'5
Posted on 1/26/26 at 3:41 pm to hawgfaninc
He had some good wins though.
Posted on 1/26/26 at 4:50 pm to hawgfaninc
5’9” and yet 3-0 against Auburn.
Posted on 1/26/26 at 4:57 pm to Aguga
quote:
What a terrible BMI.
According to BMI, Emmitt Smith was obese during his playing days. He was 5’ 9”, 220 pounds, with a BMI of 32.5. That put him square in the obese range. I have to question how accurate a system is when it calls the NFL’s all-time leading rusher obese.

Posted on 1/26/26 at 5:05 pm to TigerLunatik
Wait until you start to shrink
I was a solid 6’ now I’m 5’ 11.5” I’ll be 5’11” before they bury me maybe shorter
I was a solid 6’ now I’m 5’ 11.5” I’ll be 5’11” before they bury me maybe shorter
Posted on 1/26/26 at 5:10 pm to Eldodroptop
This is fun and not as bad as you make it sound when she’s 25 and has massive breasts
Posted on 1/26/26 at 5:20 pm to captdalton
quote:
I have to question how accurate a system is when it calls the NFL’s all-time leading rusher obese.
It’s an obsolete metric for anyone that’s built muscle mass and I’m really not sure why some docs still use it other than it’s not as easy to get body fat %. But if you fat you fat.
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top

2









