Started By
Message

re: 4 year binding NIL contracts

Posted on 9/1/25 at 7:45 am to
Posted by olgoi khorkhoi
priapism survivor
Member since May 2011
16242 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 7:45 am to
quote:

a normal student




doesnt make 7 figures to attend school
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
14647 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 7:48 am to
quote:

That’s the only way I could see all this Wild West era of NIL to come to an end.


How? You offer a 4-year binding contract, and another school offers a year-to-year contract.

Most kids take the year to year in a heartbeat
Posted by John Casey
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2016
3623 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 7:52 am to
quote:

From a donor do you like the idea that you give someone money to be there and then they are gone?


This will work itself out after donors get burned a few times.
Posted by TFH
Member since Apr 2016
3402 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 7:55 am to
quote:

Right after coaches have binding contracts.

You mean those contracts where coaches have to pay the school a penalty if they leave early to go to another school? I can’t BELIEVE they haven’t thought of that yet.

Oh wait….
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
53490 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 8:17 am to
Allow trades
It worked for Tenn and ucla
This post was edited on 9/1/25 at 8:18 am
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
39743 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 8:32 am to
quote:


A big help and something that would undo to some of the damage to team’s roster caused by NIL would be to allow the Jr’s to come back to college for their Sr years if they are not drafted very high. That could help both schools and players.


How will that help the player? They've already been drafted, they don't get to enter a new draft.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
39743 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 8:34 am to
quote:


If a school wants to poach a player they should be paying the school as well as the player they’re poaching. Make it like they’re buying the player plus his wages


Yes.

The new team pays what would have been the next year of that players NIL deals to the old team.
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
23473 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 8:37 am to
quote:

4 year binding NIL contracts


Football scholarships are year to year. The coaches do not want that changed. They might would go to 2 but not 4
Posted by Crimson K
Tuscaloosa
Member since Dec 2018
6907 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 8:43 am to
quote:

Right after coaches have binding contracts.


I think the buyouts that coaches pay when they change jobs is pretty much exactly what the OP is suggesting fir athletes who transfer.

ETA: Posters are conflating two different payments to student athletes; the revenue sharing money paid directly by the school and NIL contracts. I don’t think much can be enforced about the former, but the latter can definitely include transfer language in a contract. Whether players would balk at it is another issue.
This post was edited on 9/1/25 at 8:51 am
Posted by GoldenReb
Member since Sep 2013
802 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 8:55 am to
I liked the simple, you can transfer if you graduate or you get ONE free portal trip. Other than that you have to sit out one season.
Posted by Vol92
Member since Mar 2009
701 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

I hate to bust your bubble, but non-competes exist, million+ dollar contracts are not against an 18 year olds best interest, and collective bargaining happens in multiple sectors in the economy. You’re rambling and look like an idiot.


No moron, you have a non compete contract with your company. Not an anti-employee and anti-free market combining of all the companies in your job sector. That is collusion and illegal

That is what the ncaa or combined conferences trying to do something like that would be. Collusion and illegal
Posted by Vol92
Member since Mar 2009
701 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

I liked the simple, you can transfer if you graduate or you get ONE free portal trip. Other than that you have to sit out one season.


That is impeding an individuals right to earn income and violates employment law

That will never be allowed again, unless a players union agree to it in a CBA. which they won’t, so that’s not coming back
Posted by RollingwiththeTide
Member since Oct 2020
5720 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 1:42 pm to
If they come back for a Sr year after they are drafted then they could go back into the draft the next season and possibly be drafted higher.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
39743 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 2:09 pm to
quote:


If they come back for a Sr year after they are drafted then they could go back into the draft the next season and possibly be drafted higher.


That player has already been drafted. An NFL already has rights to them. They just report to whatever team drafted them the year prior, pay the fines for not going to camp and not playing any games, then continue on with their career.
Posted by TROJANFORCEONE
Member since Aug 2022
244 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

If a school wants to poach a player they should be paying the school as well as the player they’re poaching. Make it like they’re buying the player plus his wages


You could send em to New Orleans by riverboat and auction them off in Jackson Square.
Posted by AlaCowboy46
North Alabama
Member since Apr 2025
210 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

Because it violates employment and contract law.


Many businesses require employees to sign non-compete agreements. Simply require every scholarship athlete to sign one and they can't play in FBS. Let them go to FCS teams to play. NFL teams will still take them if they are good.
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
26087 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

You could send em to New Orleans by riverboat and auction them off in Jackson Square.


Or like a professional athlete, like they pretty much are. If you’re trying to say having millions for playing a game is comparable to slavery then that certainly is a take
Posted by Radio One
On the banks of the Wabash
Member since Sep 2023
5645 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Ohio State nipple rings

Posted by RollingwiththeTide
Member since Oct 2020
5720 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 2:31 pm to
Still better coming back and actually playing a game in college and getting experience that playing on some practice squad or special teams. The point is they play actual football rather than standing on the sidelines holding a helmet buried on the depth chart or not even active for the game.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
24931 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

A big help and something that would undo to some of the damage to team’s roster caused by NIL would be to allow the Jr’s to come back to college for their Sr years if they are not drafted very high. That could help both schools and players
How would that help? The NFL draft isn’t until late April. By that time you’ve already had the winter transfer portal window, spring practices, and the spring transfer portal window.

Are teams supposed to hold a spot in the starting lineup for juniors who declare early for the draft in case they don’t like their draft position and decide to go back to college for another season? Imagine you’re a QB who transferred in December expecting to be the starter, went through spring ball as QB1, the spring portal window already closes….but now last year’s QB wants to come back because he doesn’t like where he got drafted?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter