Started By
Message
re: 3 Sentenced in NCAA Basketball investigation
Posted on 3/6/19 at 4:40 pm to NYCAuburn
Posted on 3/6/19 at 4:40 pm to NYCAuburn
Then the judge will likely not permit the testimony at all. Mitigation for sentencing is not an issue in determining guilt. That is a separate phase and, even then, has nothing to do with Dawkins sentence. The judge isnt going to permit Dawkins’ attorney to create a sideshow about college basketball generally. It isn’t really relevant to his defense. I think that Wade will never actually get to the stand in this case.
This post was edited on 3/6/19 at 4:43 pm
0
Posted on 3/8/19 at 2:58 pm to GeorgeWest
quote:
Since the Judge ruled that supposed tape and its transcript was NOT evidence for this trial, I don't see what information they can possibly hope to get from WW.
Posted on 3/8/19 at 3:07 pm to pioneerbasketball
quote:
Since the Judge ruled that supposed tape and its transcript was NOT evidence for this trial, I don't see what information they can possibly hope to get from WW
LOTS of unfortunate and regrettable posts made this week
Posted on 3/8/19 at 3:08 pm to Vecchio Cane
Must be a typo.
Posted on 3/8/19 at 3:11 pm to LSUminati
quote:Turns out LSU has been fully cooperating with the NCAA as early as when the first media reports surfaced months ago. And they have coordinated with the NCAA every step of the way and the NCAA will continue to have LSU's full cooperation and LSU will continue to report to them all facts and information as it becomes known.
Never let facts ruin a good narrative. Until Will Wade gets on the stand, admits to pay for play (possible because he is under penalty of perjury), and the NCAA opens an investigation (in which they would still have to find something, or be given subpoenaed documents from the FBI), nothing will happen.
Posted on 3/8/19 at 3:17 pm to Vecchio Cane
Where's all the lawyers now, huh? Bunch of friggin' wiseguys.
Posted on 3/8/19 at 4:25 pm to tigerinridgeland
quote:
how do these coaches help his client’s case? Is he trying to win the case by proving his client innocent, which usually why one pleads not guilty, or is he trying to find company for his client in jail when he is sentenced.
The government case rests upon the supposition that the runners are defrauding the schools by getting the players to the school. That’s of course laughably wrong.
But the schools can’t admit it because they’d then be guilty of NCAA violations. If the schools are directing the runners, then the runners are not defrauding the schools and are therefore not guilty.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News