- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How does the FTC have the authority to do this - Non Compete ?
Posted on 4/24/24 at 6:44 am
Posted on 4/24/24 at 6:44 am
LINK
How does the fed gov have the authority to change Florida contract law (for example) ?
quote:
FTC Announces Rule Banning Noncompetes
quote:
“The FTC’s final rule to ban noncompetes will ensure Americans have the freedom to pursue a new job, start a new business, or bring a new idea to market.”
quote:
nder the FTC’s new rule, existing noncompetes for the vast majority of workers will no longer be enforceable after the rule’s effective date. Existing noncompetes for senior executives - who represent less than 0.75% of workers - can remain in force under the FTC’s final rule, but employers are banned from entering into or attempting to enforce any new noncompetes, even if they involve senior executives.
How does the fed gov have the authority to change Florida contract law (for example) ?
14
Posted on 4/24/24 at 6:49 am to dafif
Do these companies engage in interstate commerce? Do they benefit from corporate/LLC taxation at the federal level?
Also, why would states want to infringe on individual freedom?
Also, why would states want to infringe on individual freedom?
Posted on 4/24/24 at 6:52 am to dafif
I think this is wonderful. Corporations have enough power.
Non-competes outside of select scenarios with executive leadership are horseshite.
Non-competes outside of select scenarios with executive leadership are horseshite.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 6:56 am to Damone
quote:
Do they benefit from corporate/LLC taxation at the federal level?
We already know you are a fool. Please. You don’t have to keep convincing us.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 6:56 am to dafif
Arkansas football has been on a non-compete for years.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 6:57 am to dafif
If college athletes can transfer whenever and play wherever immediately then why not this?
Posted on 4/24/24 at 7:08 am to dafif
Most non-competes aren't enforceable anyway. People/Companies use them as a scare tactic.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 7:10 am to Faurot fodder
Yep just like mizzou basketball
Posted on 4/24/24 at 7:10 am to Damone
quote:
Do these companies engage in interstate commerce?
Depends on your definition of interstate commerce? Do they order supplies off Amazon?
Didn't SCOTUS just determine that rule making authority has gone too far?
And...again, what gives the feds the ability to change Florida law ... for example??
This post was edited on 4/24/24 at 7:12 am
Posted on 4/24/24 at 7:16 am to SG_Geaux
quote:Not the point. Change the laws if that's what is needed. FTC should not and likely does not have the authority to do this.
If college athletes can transfer whenever and play wherever immediately then why not this?
Posted on 4/24/24 at 7:18 am to dafif
quote:
How does the FTC have the authority to do this - Non Compete ?
It doesn’t. Like a lot of other Biden crap, this will end up at SCOTUS. One executive agency can’t change contract law.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 7:19 am to dafif
Pretty crazy. I studied with a friend at LSU, he went on to Cornell for grad school then to IBM in Burlington. He works on the next generation battlefield, all controlled through satellite connectivity for the US military…the driverless car world stuff…his non compete is 10 years. If he can just go start a company with US government secret technology then I’m calling him today.
This post was edited on 4/24/24 at 7:21 am
Posted on 4/24/24 at 7:21 am to dafif
They don't.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 7:24 am to Damone
Once the SCOTUS rules on Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and ditches the Chevron Rule, this agency and others will not be able to try this.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 7:31 am to dafif
I'm no lawyer, but the current strategy on the left seems to be use executive action/regulatory agency power to make some ruling that is probably illegal/unconstitutional, and force the right to litigate it, which likely will take years. In the interim all kinds of damage is done that in many cases can't or won't be undone. Biden's student loan transfer is a great example of this and this is likely another.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 7:36 am to dafif
quote:
And...again, what gives the feds the ability to change Florida law ... for example??
I haven't read the rule, and I won't since the last time I just got Neanderthal responses, but there will be cited Congressional authority. So whatever that law is, is the answer to your question.
All regulations must flow from Congressional delegation of power.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 7:37 am to coolpapaboze
quote:
I'm no lawyer, but the current strategy on the left seems to be use executive action/regulatory agency power to make some ruling that is probably illegal/unconstitutional, and force the right to litigate it, which likely will take years. In the interim all kinds of damage is done that in many cases can't or won't be undone. Biden's student loan transfer is a great example of this and this is likely another.
This isn't a partisan thing. Plenty of Republican regulations/EOs were litigated and struck down, too.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 7:38 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
Once the SCOTUS rules on Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and ditches the Chevron Rule, this agency and others will not be able to try this.
I don't think this particular regulation relies on Chevron.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 7:39 am to Damone
quote:
Do these companies engage in interstate commerce? Do they benefit from corporate/LLC taxation at the federal level? Also, why would states want to infringe on individual freedom?
You should work for the politburo. Although I can make their arguments much better than you apparently can.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 7:44 am to Damone
quote:
Do these companies engage in interstate commerce?
Ah, yes. The "everything imaginable is interstate commerce so therefore administrative agencies can do whatever they want" argument.
If the federal government wants to regulate state contract law, Congress needs to do it, or authorize the FTC to do it. Congress has not done so.
quote:
Also, why would states want to infringe on individual freedom?
The "why" doesn't matter. Contract law and policy is the States' prerogative.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News