| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 8070 |
| Registered on: | 1/29/2019 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Help me out here. I saw in passing a news report
Posted by dafif on 1/27/26 at 7:28 pm to CoachChappy
I would think discretionary immunity applies here
0
re: Ohio Attorney General dem candidate says he is going to kill Trump
Posted by dafif on 1/27/26 at 7:17 pm to jizzle6609
Sent this to nephew who is lawyer in Columbus and in politics a bit and asked what he thought
re: This is What Powerboy, TX Tiger & SFP Call "Peaceful Protesters"
Posted by dafif on 1/27/26 at 7:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
Question - in the video above were any laws broken?
If so and they resisted arrest would lethal force be allowed ?
If so and they resisted arrest would lethal force be allowed ?
quote:
This is why letting them block streets, roads
Not in Florida !
re: The 2 agents that fired on Pretti being investigated internally
Posted by dafif on 1/27/26 at 7:04 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
doesn’t mean I think they deserve to die
Nobody is saying he "deserved" to die and I don't think anyone wanted him to die
The unfortunate analysis is that the guy made multiple horrific choices that led to him being shot and losing his life.
Perhaps it is a benefit to democratic platforms but ultimately these federal employ are trying to do their job and cannot because of the actions of these people
re: Trump vs Kirk.....who is right?
Posted by dafif on 1/27/26 at 12:32 pm to SneezyBeltranIsHere
quote:
He was standing off to the side, videoing with his phone, when an ICE agent walked 20+ yards oevr to pepper spray him and then tackle him. His gun, which he never brandished, was removed from his person. He was shot and killed several seconds after he was disarmed.
I am wondering how many more false statements you can make in one paragraph
What I understand from the series of event is that this person came up to where federal agents were doing their job he was wearing a protective bath and brandishing the firearm with multiple rounds of ammunition
I confronted a female and he came in on waffle to assist the lady and got pepper spray and resistance with a weapon and multiple rounds of and during his resistance he was shot
Now tell me what statement I made that was not true
quote:
He was trying to protect a woman they attacked
What, exactly, gave him that right? Be specific
quote:
I don’t think anyone would be surprised when the democrats try to impeach him again
The real question that comes to mind is whether enough Republicans would join the vote to impeach to actually succeed because of their hatred for Trump ?
Would they look at it as having Vance be a better two year alternative to run the country?
quote:
If D.C. grand juries are rejecting 8+ felony indictments in a month, maybe the problem isn’t the jurors—it’s the feds turning every confrontation into a federal case to justify their bloated surge ops.
If you believe that then explain the grandmother getting indicted and convicted on J6 for just entering a public building
ETA: I am a firm believer that the Republicans in Congress refusal to act also plays a large part in all of this
re: Is this the beginning of Civil War 2.0?
Posted by dafif on 1/25/26 at 7:55 pm to PurpleSingularity
The answer is all available republicans with guns go up and protect ice and watch them scatter
re: Republicans have no stomach… Comer suggest pulling ICE out of MN
Posted by dafif on 1/25/26 at 7:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
You really are an obnoxious blowhard
You don't add anything except filling this space with 1s and 0s almost 500,000 times
You don't add anything except filling this space with 1s and 0s almost 500,000 times
I did not listen - not worth the time
Did he give a solution because all I ever hear is "if you do what dems want we won't impeach"
Did he give a solution because all I ever hear is "if you do what dems want we won't impeach"
quote:
Walz and Frey are playing it perfect with their army of "useful idiots" willing to "observe" and interfere with federal authorities.
Lady on tv just flat out said that this guy and good were two of the most peaceful people
Frick em -
re: Dept of Education to be funded in new spending bill, despite claims it will be abolished
Posted by dafif on 1/24/26 at 6:25 am to hawgfaninc
We are witnessing in real time how the government congress is fully corrupted and they will never allow us to get rid of their gravy train
Is that a crime?
Anyone ask him about his prior court sanctions for lying ?
Anyone ask him about his prior court sanctions for lying ?
In the 12 minute video the most important thing said is this:
"It is our parents status that is most important"
I hope SCOTUS follows that.
"It is our parents status that is most important"
I hope SCOTUS follows that.
re: Birthright citizenship - Library of congress deleted history!
Posted by dafif on 1/21/26 at 6:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
Those are all arguments that are being made.
Despite dicta, the singular holding in WKA is that a person here legally and giving birth makes that baby a US citizen.
Despite dicta, the singular holding in WKA is that a person here legally and giving birth makes that baby a US citizen.
re: Massie is Consistent: He called for Release of Names in Congressional Hush Fund
Posted by dafif on 1/21/26 at 5:38 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Because of the provisions of the ironically named Congressional Accountability Act, settlement payment come from a special Treasury fund that the Office of Compliance draws from as necessary. The offices responsible for the payouts, and the reasons for the settlements, are kept strictly confidential."
So...my question is...where do the funds come from? If taxpayers, we are entitled to an accounting with details. I do not believe their own law protects them from us. Under what basis do they get to shield themselves? Cannot be national secrets.
re: Birthright citizenship - Library of congress deleted history!
Posted by dafif on 1/21/26 at 5:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
I do not admit to know how this goes but I know it weighs heavily on illegals coming here to birth kids and then get welfare, etc
It all comes down to "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof," and it is not outside the realm of possibility that a court could determine that a person illegally in this country is not actually "subject to" and therefore the kids are not citizens.
Overall, however, I think it is less than 50% of being interpreted that way and the pure madhouse effect would be crazy on this country.
It all comes down to "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof," and it is not outside the realm of possibility that a court could determine that a person illegally in this country is not actually "subject to" and therefore the kids are not citizens.
Overall, however, I think it is less than 50% of being interpreted that way and the pure madhouse effect would be crazy on this country.
Popular
24
