Started By
Message
re: CFP Round 1 vs Tulane - 12/20 2:30pm TNT
Posted on 12/10/25 at 1:58 pm to rebsfan10
Posted on 12/10/25 at 1:58 pm to rebsfan10
quote:Or they want to go to a game with an actual P4 matchup and not a rematch of a 45-10 slaughtering
I'm sure Nick Saban told them he's not coming to Oxford. Knows the reception he'd get after his hypocrisy.
1
Posted on 12/10/25 at 3:37 pm to Henry Jones Jr
Nah, Saban scurred. Like LSU fans, I reject reality and substitute my own.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:46 pm to TMRebel
Not a terrible schedule. Just hate that we play lswho middle of September. That game should always be late October or right before the EB.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:50 pm to RebelVol
Yeah, having a home game on Halloween and it not being LSU is a travesty
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:52 pm to Jimmy Chestnut
They made a major mistake not having that game on Halloween night (may work out in OM’s favor though - would much rather play them earlier).
That game is already going to be insane - add in Halloween night though, boy…
That game is already going to be insane - add in Halloween night though, boy…
This post was edited on 12/11/25 at 7:54 pm
Posted on 12/11/25 at 8:07 pm to TheJunction
quote:
They made a major mistake not having that game on Halloween night (may work out in OM’s favor though - would much rather play them earlier).
Week 3 is the best way to guarantee GameDay is in Oxford for it. Even if both teams are rolling in 1-1, it's GameDay.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 9:22 pm to OleVaught14
Maybe they are trying to make Auburn our Halloween game. Played them Nov 1 in 2014 (treadwell game) and Oct 30 in 2021 - the game where we had no receivers.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 10:28 pm to Dixie.Reb
There is absolutely no reason to have the lsu-ole miss game any weekend other than Halloween.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 10:35 pm to Dixie.Reb
Aub isn’t a permanent rivalry though are they? So we won’t play them every year.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 4:31 am to RebelVol
I thought we traded off all the non-3 permanent SEC teams? I didn’t think we’d have UGA or UF. Does that mean we won’t play A&M or Bama for another couple seasons?
Posted on 12/12/25 at 7:39 am to RebelVol
We seem to not so subtly be trying to get Archie back on board.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 7:51 am to TMRebel
quote:
We seem to not so subtly be trying to get Archie back on board.
I'm good with it as long as he doesn't have any influence into hires/fires. He's been terrible at that aspect.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:00 am to Landmass
As I forget, is Kiffin the main reason Arch stayed away from us?
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:23 am to Insideradvantage
He definitely didn’t help but I don’t think he was coming anyway. Someone said that when he had an official visit his junior year, Kiffin either showed up way late to meet them or stood them up
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:25 am to Henry Jones Jr
If we offered that kid $7 mil per year and he ended up looking like he did this year, I’d have a stroke.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:35 am to TMRebel
So I’ll defend Arch a little here. He’s had a below average offensive line and no wide receivers to really throw too.
Even still he has thrown for 3000 yards, 24 TDs and 7 interceptions while also rushing for 8 TDs. All in his first year being a starter.
It’s not $7 million worth this year but the kid will get better. But Texas has to get him better receivers and an improved offensive line. He didn’t have that bad of a first year.
Even still he has thrown for 3000 yards, 24 TDs and 7 interceptions while also rushing for 8 TDs. All in his first year being a starter.
It’s not $7 million worth this year but the kid will get better. But Texas has to get him better receivers and an improved offensive line. He didn’t have that bad of a first year.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 9:36 am
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:39 am to TMRebel
Given the way it's played out so far, I bet there has at least been a time or two that Arch has regretted that decision. Maybe not as a whole, but at least a little.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 10:09 am to Henry Jones Jr
At the very least, it was a failure in allocation of resources. They could’ve used some of that $7 mil for at least 1 good receiver and some O line help.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 11:11 am to Henry Jones Jr
I think you’re correct.
But it doesn’t change that with a $7 million NIL deal will come with a lot of well deserved scrutiny. He has played well but not well enough to live up to his billing. Anything short of a natty is a waste.
But it doesn’t change that with a $7 million NIL deal will come with a lot of well deserved scrutiny. He has played well but not well enough to live up to his billing. Anything short of a natty is a waste.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 11:14 am to Shunface
How did they get the $7 million through the clearinghouse? I haven't seen him on any commercials.
Page 13 of 16
Latest Ole Miss News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News