Started By
Message

re: To anybody who insists a vote against Hillary...

Posted on 6/26/16 at 11:57 am to
Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
16167 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 11:57 am to
quote:

She is not without her flaws, but a much better option than Trump and it isn't close.


quote:

GOP has lost its way thanks to the Tea Party and the Corporatist (Who has too much
quote:

influence in my party
as well, just not as bad


So Clinton must be getting a huge percentage of her Donor money from the people, like Bernie, not from the Corporate interest groups and super pacs correct? Mean while old Donald is getting all his money from the Goldman Sachs of the world, Timeswarner, Boeing, Phizer. These are Donald Trump "corporatist" correct? No wonder you like Hillary so much. She isnt bought and paid for by huge corporate interest groups. But can you imagine if she was? That would mean anyone who complained about corporate interest groups while voting for Hillary would be a hypocrite, and quite frankly, just a fricking idiot. Good thing huh.
Posted by Reservoir dawg
Member since Oct 2013
15062 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 4:38 pm to
A vote for Hillary is a vote against America. I've been claiming for several years that U.S. patriotism is in severe decline, we'll see if I'm right come November.
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
21569 posts
Posted on 6/28/16 at 6:12 pm to
Holding your nose & voting for Hillary is not just a vote for Obama Part III, but more importantly, you are voting for her Supreme Court. At best, she will probably get to nominate 4 more liberals to the Court, especially if the Dems get control of the Senate, a strong possibilty. And with the average age of the appointees being mentioned recently being in the mid 60's, that means that her Court will be making super liberal rulings for the next 20 yrs, give or take a yr. Look at the 4 liberals sitting now & give them 4 more votes. As opposed to voting for Trump, who will be so ham strung by Congress, both sides of the aisle acting against him, the media, he won't be able to pass anything that remotely scares liberals now. And after Hillary's 4 yrs are up, her VP will no doubt win another 8 yrs, adding up to 20 yrs of Obama's rule.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34910 posts
Posted on 6/28/16 at 9:27 pm to
Dude you need to move back to Texas where your vote doesn't count so you don't have to vote Dem in presidential elections.
Posted by finestfirst79
Vicksburg, Mississippi
Member since Nov 2012
11646 posts
Posted on 6/28/16 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

Dude you need to move back to Texas where your vote doesn't count so you don't have to vote Dem in presidential elections.


You think Mississippi will go for Hillary? I sure don't, because like Texas we're mostly idiots. I'll make my mark anyway.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34910 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 10:18 am to
quote:

You think Mississippi will go for Hillary? I sure don't, because like Texas we're mostly idiots.



Yeah but it isn't something you could bet your life on like in Texas. I will probably never vote for a major political party for as long as I live here. It's so nice to not have to compromise my principles just to satisfy some electoral math, it's one of my favorite things about being a Texan.
Posted by PurpleandGeauld
Florence, TX
Member since Oct 2013
5440 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 2:02 pm to
I know it sounds all conspiracy theory crazy, but I will not be surprised if there is no election at all.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
37573 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 6:21 am to
quote:

So you would rather vote for someone who would rob you then do nothing. That's simple math. Breaking even is better than massive debts from a crook. Even using your "logic" its an absolutely terrible decision.


You dont like Trump because you dont understand the game plan. I understand. But if you like Hillary you arent American in my book. (Unless extremely poor wanting handouts or > 1% making money off her thieving schemes.) Thats a crooked arse bitch

Can't stand Hillary and wouldn't vote for her as dog catcher, but, all due respect, GFY. No one gives a shite where they rate in your "book". The pubs nominated a Twitter capable orangutan and told us they didn't need any help from the cucks. The Trump Train ain't got no brakes. Now they try to guilt us to death into voting for him. I'm writing in this year.
Posted by CaptainBrannigan
Good Ole Rocky Top Tennessee
Member since Jan 2010
21644 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 9:35 am to
quote:

Now tell me again how Trump is the worst option?



In regards to debt the man literally said "we print the money." Thar is very frightening. He is a macroeconomic bafoon. His fans are so uneducated that do not understand this danger.
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
25401 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 11:00 am to
quote:

His fans are so uneducated that do not understand this danger.


A prime example of the insulting condescension I can't stand about this whole issue.

That derision is offensive. I'm no "fan", but I do regard him as the lesser of two evils, and I am willing to bet I am as educated and world-aware as anyone on this board.
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
31826 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 11:53 am to
quote:

In regards to debt the man literally said "we print the money." Thar is very frightening. He is a macroeconomic bafoon. His fans are so uneducated that do not understand this danger.




i'd give some weight to this if Obama didn't threaten congress everytime they spend above their limits to raise the debt ceiling. it's the same damn thing.
Posted by jbond
Atlanta
Member since Jun 2012
4975 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 2:34 pm to
Clinton would lead a dictatorship? How is that? I honestly can't tell if you're exaggerating or serious.
Posted by jbond
Atlanta
Member since Jun 2012
4975 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 2:38 pm to
Obama has never suggested defaulting on our debt could be a negotiation strategy or implied he'd start a trade war.

Either you believe Trump when he says that, and are willing to suffer the consequences in your 401k, or you think he's just pandering and wouldn't actually try that. Which is it, recklessness or pandering?
This post was edited on 7/1/16 at 2:39 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter