Favorite team:US Army 
Location:Cochise County AZ
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:38188
Registered on:7/2/2009
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

You mean when they depleted the Oil reserves?
2022: $5 peak
2023: $3.50
2024: $3.30

SPR was released during the spike, not after.

So prices fell, and your example is a mitigation effort, not a cause.

Well, according to most of my family, it does, and it's in Jackson County, Missouri, just outside of Independence.
quote:

Still cheaper than the last administration but at least you're fine being retarded.
Still cheaper than 2022. His term didn't end then. Gas is more than under the last admin in 2023 and 2024. Y'all love your single data points though.
quote:

Biden - According to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the national average price of regular gasoline climbed above $4 per gallon for several consecutive months in 2022, beginning in March and remaining there through July. Prices ultimately peaked at about $5.02 to $5.07 per gallon in June 2022, marking the highest national average ever recorded
And what were they in 2023 and 2024?
This was a fun thread. Brought up a lot of names and places I hadn’t thought about in years. Whatever the current geopolitical reality is, it was an incredible place to be stationed.

My kids were born there and spent big parts of their childhood there, so it's special to me. And honestly, I feel for soldiers now who won’t get that same experience, especially the older version of it. Back when units were scattered and you were just a small piece of the local community, not a self-contained American bubble.

There wasn’t always a big PX or commissary to fall back on, so you ended up living on the local economy by default.
quote:


I doubt it would hurt much at all. We've closed large bases all over Germany the past 20 years with pretty much no impact to their economies.

Heidelberg, Schweinfurt, Wurzburg, Bamberg, Mannheim, etc.
It probably hit smaller towns like Baumholder or Babenhausen harder, but when I was there for the Darmstadt closure, the only visible change was the alterations shop outside one of the gates shutting down. Even the guy next door, whose entire business was selling auto insurance to soldiers, is somehow still around almost 20 years later.

A lot of people miss this, but U.S. forces in Germany weren’t historically concentrated on massive installations. They were spread across many dozens (maybe over 100) of small kasernes, some barely hosting a battalion or two, embedded in otherwise normal mid-sized cities.

Today it’s the opposite. Forces are consolidated, and a full withdrawal would hit places like K-Town, Ramstein (basically one ecosystem), or Grafenwöhr hard. But the footprint now is a fraction of what it was 30 years ago, so most of the real economic shock already happened during the drawdowns. What’s left would hurt locally, but it wouldn’t be the same kind of systemic impact people imagine.
quote:

Actually I am sending your replies to a bunch of retired aviators, we are having a grand time laughing at your silly arse.
If I believed this was true, which I don’t, the idea that a bunch of elite career officers are spending Easter Sunday having a “grand time” laughing at secondhand message board posts is absurdly lame and unintentionally hilarious. Top Gun was apparently even more full of shite than I thought. :rotflmao:
I saw the Dead at Shoreline in Mountain View in 1995 (I was 16) because a girl I liked was into it. Turned out to be their last show on the west coast. I was on a weird run of musicians dying right after I saw them. Jerry Garcia, Kurt Cobain, Bradley Nowell, Biggie Smalls, Shannon Hoon, Jeff Buckley. Got dragged to Aerosmith 3 times by my dad and those frickers are still going today. :banghead:


It wasn't my thing, I'll just say that
quote:

Let’s wait till they get fifth gen jets
They're still flying F-4's and base model MIG 29's exports. :lol:
quote:

That’s a lot of words to say I am a bitch. Just do that next time
Just one man's opinion but this is how that reads to me:

quote:

Did you ask chat GPT to summarize all of Reddit in one incoherent screech?
You can disagree with it but if you found the OP incoherent that's a you problem.
quote:

Perhaps it's time to start lining some of you up against the wall.
quote:

You do realize that it's not their weapon, per se, it's the Army's or the Marine Corps. They are responsible for it, but they use it at the pleasure of the Army or Marine Corps or any other branch of the service. So thus, it's not their weapon .
This is about personally owned firearms. During my time, if you lived in the barracks your weapons had to be stored in the arms room. You had to sign them out if you wanted to take them to the range, hunting, or anything else. If you lived in on-post housing, it was usually up to the commander whether you could keep them in your residence or still store them in the arms room. Either way, transport was tightly controlled. You were only authorized to have them while traveling directly to and from your destination, and they had to be unloaded.

What’s being proposed here sounds like a loosening of that framework, potentially even moving toward some form of concealed or open carry on post. I don’t have an issue with that direction, but it should be limited to officers and NCOs, especially in barracks environments.

Anyone who’s served knows exactly what junior enlisted barracks can be like. It’s constant partying, alcohol, bad decisions, and zero foresight. Someone here once put it perfectly: military drinking is to college drinking what college drinking is to high school drinking. I’m completely certain that if firearms had been accessible in the barracks when I was a private, you’d be dealing with shots fired in some manner at least once a week.
I’m focusing on the basketball court because that’s the claim being made in this thread. If you want to defend it, then defend it. Saying “why are you focusing on it” is just dodging the actual point (like a bitch).

Now to your examples.

Yes, the Truman Balcony is structural. That’s not the issue. The reason it didn’t need a separate act of Congress is because it was a smaller, discrete addition handled within existing authority and funding, not a full reconstruction or a brand new standalone building requiring new appropriations. That’s why the full White House gut job went through Congress, but the balcony itself didn’t. Same property, different scale, different category.

Which puts it in the same lane as:

Rose Garden changes
flagpole additions
and Obama’s basketball setup

All of those are routine modifications to existing property handled administratively. No one went to Congress for any of them.

Now here’s the part you keep dodging:

Explain why Obama adding paint and hoops to an existing court is somehow a bigger or different category than Trump installing permanent flagpoles or modifying the Rose Garden.

You haven’t addressed that once. You just keep jumping to bigger or unrelated examples to avoid it.

So again, either they’re all the same category, or you need to explain why Obama’s was somehow bigger than Trump’s.

eta- and he logs off. Shocker. Another dumbfrick maga politard completely incapable of defending the idiotic shite he says with total confidence. If the people I agreed with were so consistently bad at justifying or even articulating my position, I'd give a little thought to the question of why my position consistently aligns with the beliefs of retards, but I guess that's just me.

downvotes with no response:

quote:

lol... Right out the gate with labels and name calling . Typical lib.
Before I do my full response, you're aware you started with the personal attacks, or are you going to go with the pussy route and claim "are you dumb?" was just a question? Own your comments. Don't be a bitch.
quote:

WTF are you talking about ......are you saying adding that balcony isn't structural? Well I would say it is... It is an addition. Just like then new ballroom. What design reviews are you referring to? Are you saying the new ball room didn't get designed or reviewed? Are you dumb? The balcony didn't need Congress because it wasn't publicly funded....neither does the ballroom.
You’re still mixing categories and then dodging the actual comparison.

You're doing that because you're not capable of even understanding, much less engaging, the argument.

Yes, the Truman Balcony is structural. That’s not the issue. The issue is why it didn’t need a separate act of Congress, and the answer is simple: it was a smaller, discrete project handled within existing authority and funding, not a full reconstruction or a brand new standalone building requiring new appropriations. That’s exactly why Truman’s full gut renovation went through Congress, but the balcony itself didn’t. Same property, different scale, different category.

Which puts it in the same lane as:

Rose Garden changes
flagpole additions
and Obama’s basketball setup

All of those are modifications to an existing property handled under normal administrative authority. No one went to Congress for any of them, and no one expected them to.

Now here’s the part you keep avoiding:

Explain why Obama adding paint and hoops to an existing court is somehow a bigger or different category than Trump installing permanent flagpoles or modifying the Rose Garden.

You haven’t touched that comparison once, because you can’t. You aren't capable.

Instead you jumped to Truman’s full reconstruction and now a ballroom, which are clearly a different category of project entirely.

And honestly, I welcome the “are you dumb” shite on this board. For anyone reading along who isn’t a dumbass like yourself. it just makes it more obvious you’ve got nothing to say about the actual point.
quote:

so what do you think about the gutting and reconstruction of the White House Truman did..... Yes he got congressional approval because he wanted them to find it... And they did. But they did not approve the Truman Balcony....which he private funded and built... Sooooo is this I'm different?
"Anyone capable” of addressing this would start by not switching categories mid-argument.

Truman gutting and rebuilding the White House is exactly the point, that was major structural work, so it went through Congress. That’s the category large construction belongs in.

The Truman Balcony actually proves the opposite of what you’re implying. It wasn’t part of the main reconstruction, it was a separate addition that went through design review and approval but did not require a standalone act of Congress. It was controversial, debated, and still ultimately handled within the normal administrative process.

Obama putting hoops and paint on an existing tennis court is not that category. Trump adding flagpoles and making changes to the Rose Garden isn’t that category either. Those are routine modifications to the grounds that every administration makes without congressional approval.

So no, it’s not the same, and you already know it’s not the same.

If you want to stay consistent, compare:

basketball court mod
flagpoles
Rose Garden

If you want to talk Truman, then you’re talking full reconstruction, which puts you in the same lane as something like a new ballroom, not a painted court.

Pick one category and stick to it.
quote:

Do you think China/India etc. are going to simply reduce their intake of oil?

Or do you think they’re going to start offering more money to other suppliers that aren’t affected by this issue leading to an increase in the global price of oil?

Which one? Hmm…truly difficult to say.
quote:

DEAR GOD why are all you liberals so damn stupid. You have the worlds knowledge in your hands and your still dumb as shite. Take three seconds from your TDS and look it up. They already planned for your little whining arse attempt at defending this idiotic judge. And even if they hadn’t why weren’t you on TD bashing Oblama when he built a basketball court?? Because you don’t give a shite what’s built or how much money is spent you just care which side builds it BE HONEST
Was Trump blocked from his previous renovations and projects like the Rose Garden or the flagpoles? Would you say Obama's basketball court project is closer to those or the ballroom? And if you believe adding hoops and painting lines on an existing court is closer to building a ballroom than Trumps other projects, why?

eta-Anyone capable of addressing this?
quote:

Barry Soetoro had a basketball court built. I wonder what the difference is? (Wink/Wink)


If you want an actual apples to apples comparison, you’d compare Obama adding hoops and paint to an existing tennis court with Trump’s comparable projects like the Rose Garden changes or the flagpole additions, neither of which were blocked or required special approval and all of which fall under the same category of routine modifications to the grounds. That’s the lane the basketball setup sits in, not new construction.

If you want to argue they’re different, then explain how painting lines and putting up hoops on an existing court is somehow closer to putting up a new building than altering the Rose Garden or installing permanent flagpoles.

You’re just comparing a minor modification to an entirely different category like building a ballroom and pretending they’re the same thing and ignoring the similar in scope projects Trump had no problem doing.

re: Tina Peters still in jail

Posted by northshorebamaman on 3/30/26 at 6:09 pm to
Wait until you find out about all the people that aren't in jail.