Started By
Message
re: So the guy at the press conference saying 9/11 was an inside job
Posted on 2/3/14 at 12:49 pm to Wtodd
Posted on 2/3/14 at 12:49 pm to Wtodd
quote:
Wtodd
Don't think I don't find this conversation interesting. Just because I don't believe it's a conspiracy, doesn't mean I'm not happy to explore that idea. I've just got limited time to really dig into these discussions.
1
Posted on 2/3/14 at 12:50 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
If Forrest Gump didn't call in the complaint about men walking around with flash lights it would have never been exposed.
Well played.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 12:51 pm to Duke
quote:
Don't think I don't find this conversation interesting. Just because I don't believe it's a conspiracy, doesn't mean I'm not happy to explore that idea. I've just got limited time to really dig into these discussions.
I knew you found it interesting or you wouldn't have asked. Understand about the time part.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 12:54 pm to Duke
quote:
i could maybe believe a pearl harbor like scenario for 9/11 but not a inside job.
I'm with you on that point.
The best 911 documentary, hands down, is called September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor.
It's 5 hours long, without theatrics, not an easy watch.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 12:57 pm to Duke
quote:
Well played.
I dunno, I always thought it was because 2 chicks loved Dick?
Posted on 2/3/14 at 12:58 pm to Sleeping Tiger
The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) actually called for "a new Pearl Harbor".
"Section V of Rebuilding America's Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", includes the sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor".
LINK
"Section V of Rebuilding America's Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", includes the sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor".
LINK
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:26 pm to cas4t
Cas you know why he did that don't you?
Petey has lots of "fanboys" that have followed him throughout his career because he is a "9/11 realist" (name of the group, believes among other things that all 9/11 attacks were Bloomberg or whatever group that supposedly controls the US government and world trade working through the government to organize attacks, really all major attacks, the Dark Knight psycho in the theatre, the Sandy Hook Massacre all hoaxes staged or attacks by military personnel, also believes there is a giant weather machine -what Carroll said- that can create tornados, hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis, and overall storms in general and is under government control as well, they are a nutty bunch)
Anyway Carroll has a following of them
Petey has lots of "fanboys" that have followed him throughout his career because he is a "9/11 realist" (name of the group, believes among other things that all 9/11 attacks were Bloomberg or whatever group that supposedly controls the US government and world trade working through the government to organize attacks, really all major attacks, the Dark Knight psycho in the theatre, the Sandy Hook Massacre all hoaxes staged or attacks by military personnel, also believes there is a giant weather machine -what Carroll said- that can create tornados, hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis, and overall storms in general and is under government control as well, they are a nutty bunch)
Anyway Carroll has a following of them
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:34 pm to Wtodd
quote:
Somebody actually said they believe the Roswell conspiracy but not this? Just Wow!!
To be fair, that guy sends dick pics to dudes.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:35 pm to BuccWildBammer
I wonder if a Superbowl winning coach, a rather charismatic one at that, who supports the 911 truth movement does anything for the basement dwelling tin foil hat stigma that is associated with its followers. I doubt it.
This post was edited on 2/3/14 at 1:37 pm
Posted on 2/3/14 at 8:10 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Article and video
A bit longer than the vine. Also, is the use of "hijacked" an unfortunate slip of the tongue or a play on words?
A bit longer than the vine. Also, is the use of "hijacked" an unfortunate slip of the tongue or a play on words?
Posted on 2/3/14 at 8:41 pm to cas4t
You conspiracy tards are overlooking one minor detail: there's a plane full of people that was tracked to the Pentagon, and that plane and the people are all missing.
But yeah, it was probably a missile.
But yeah, it was probably a missile.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 9:19 pm to PrivatePublic
I can't fathom the level of crazy it takes to watch two large airliners crash into two very tall buildings on LIVE TELEVISION and then question the authenticity of a report saying that there were, in fact, large planes being crashed into buildings.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 9:30 pm to PrivatePublic
quote:
You conspiracy tards are overlooking one minor detail: there's a plane full of people that was tracked to the Pentagon, and that plane and the people are all missing.
But yeah, it was probably a missile
A declassified document, Operation Northwoods, shares a plan that answers your concern. Page 10 illustrates a clear plan to switch aircraft with a drone, there you'll find your answer about passengers. LINK
Posted on 2/3/14 at 9:31 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
I can't fathom the level of crazy it takes to watch two large airliners crash into two very tall buildings on LIVE TELEVISION and then question the authenticity of a report saying that there were, in fact, large planes being crashed into buildings.
There may be some that question whether or not real planes hit the towers, but most 'truthers' do not. And it's hardly a relevant point against the official story.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 9:49 pm to Sleeping Tiger
I was going to explain how absolutely ludicrous your posts are, but you're so far down the rabbit hole you probably think National Treasure was a documentary.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 9:50 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Sup mograyback. How many NSA lists do you think you're on?
Posted on 2/3/14 at 9:52 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
I was going to explain how absolutely ludicrous your posts are,
But there was nothing ludicrous, so you had to make a joke instead.
Posted on 2/3/14 at 10:01 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
A declassified document, Operation Northwoods, shares a plan that answers your concern. Page 10 illustrates a clear plan to switch aircraft with a drone, there you'll find your answer about passengers. LINK
Serious question: How many times have you been questioned by the NSA?
Posted on 2/3/14 at 10:06 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
It's a topic that's long been an easy target to laugh at, and rightfully so, but if you take the time with an open mind you'll find a lot that goes against what we've been told.
The Loose Changes and Zeitgeists don't cut it, that's more about sensationalism and entertainment.
Also, 'inside job' doesn't necessarily mean our government did it. Saudi Arabia is where my finger is pointing.
If you truly believe this, and I mean truly deep down genuinely believe it, how could you continue living in America? How could you possibly live in a country in which you believe the government is capable of either orchestrating the attacks or allowing them to happen?
I'd be on the first flight to Europe and never look back, cost be damned.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News