Started By
Message

Melt time

Posted on 9/26/22 at 1:32 pm
Posted by Mizzou Mule
St. Charles County, Missou-rah
Member since Sep 2014
3072 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 1:32 pm
LINK

Read that "perfection" all you Drinkwitz lovers, positives from the game, the D is good, he just "needs more time" and the "Pinkel was bad early" types. GMADB! We've seen this shite-show how many times over the last 40+ YEARS??? We are the laughing stock of the SEC and Drink is the head clown.

He should have been fired walking off of J-H.

Slowly for you dipshits...Drinkwitz. Does. Not. Know. What. He. Is. Doing.

You cannot "fake it until you make it" in the SEC. You will be exposed. Buzzwords do not get it done.

EVERY coach recruiting against Drink should have laminated those comments for every player, his family, his HS coaches and HS teammates. Tape-it to every locker in the recruit's HS. Drink just flushed himself for the world to see. Checkmate...it's over.
This post was edited on 9/26/22 at 2:28 pm
Posted by mizslu314
Dirty STL
Member since Sep 2013
15961 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 1:57 pm to
Hey, there was good news in this game..

Not many teams can say they had a 95% win probability 3 different times...especially all in the final minutes. half of the teams normally just get 1.
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 2:04 pm to
You. Are. An. Idiot
Posted by McMillan
Member since Jul 2018
5874 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 2:20 pm to
and that's only on twitter.

Tigerboard is lighting his redneck arse up.
This post was edited on 9/26/22 at 2:21 pm
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111498 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 2:21 pm to
Melts mean absolutely zero when it comes to anything of value.

We lost an SEC road game.
Put on our big boy pants and watch again.
Posted by Mizzou Mule
St. Charles County, Missou-rah
Member since Sep 2014
3072 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Put on our big boy pants and watch again.


I've been doing exactly that since 1973. Season ticket holder. Done...done with Drink especially.
This post was edited on 9/26/22 at 2:32 pm
Posted by MizzouFan13
Member since Mar 2020
506 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 2:45 pm to
Since you are so convinced he needs to be gone, realistically who are we going to get to be our next HC. We aint going to get an established coach. At least give the guy 1 full recruiting cycle to get his guys. Some of yall are so impatient. We are fricking Mizzou, not a top program. We need to give any HC we hire time to actually build something.

Any coach worth a shite, wouldnt want to come here when you look at our hiring history and we are running coaches off after 3/4 years. No time to build or establish anything.
This post was edited on 9/26/22 at 2:47 pm
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
17954 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

Since you are so convinced he needs to be gone, realistically who are we going to get to be our next HC.


That is just silly. It doesn't matter who the prospects are. If a change is required to improve things, you make the change. Any change could be bad or it could be good. You dont avoid change because of fear of the unknown.
Posted by MizzouTrue
Member since Jun 2016
3841 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 3:07 pm to
Bama has that “melt thread” every week, they even do it for themselves when they lose

They kept a close eye on the Auburn Missouri game because they hate Auburn. Most were disappointed that Auburn won, but also probably happy that Harsin was retained

This is the SEC
Posted by MizzouFan13
Member since Mar 2020
506 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 3:21 pm to
Question for you, we fire drink and hire another coach, what happens if he is worse than drink? than what do we do? Probably sets us back another 5-6 years of being terrible. Yes it could work out, also, giving drink another year could work out. You dont know, but i can tell you, changing the HC now would throw out any progress he has made for the program, including recruiting and trying to lock down the borders.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
17954 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

Question for you, we fire drink and hire another coach, what happens if he is worse than drink? than what do we do? Probably sets us back another 5-6 years of being terrible. Yes it could work out, also, giving drink another year could work out. You dont know, but i can tell you, changing the HC now would throw out any progress he has made for the program, including recruiting and trying to lock down the borders.


First, can you point out the progress under Drink? I like the guy and would love for him to work out. I can't find anything to point to. Something would be great.

Second, this is easy. Anytime you are at the point that you cannot improve w/out change you make the change. don't overcomplicate it.

As ku has proven once again, you are never far from respectability as it only takes the right hire.

We are already around the 13th-14th program in the SEC as of today. The question is are we better than Vandy or USC? More of this would just be status quo. It isn't like we are winning divisions and risking not winning divisions. There is no "setting us back" from where we are right now. we are just about as bad as it gets.
Posted by mizslu314
Dirty STL
Member since Sep 2013
15961 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 3:48 pm to


quote:

Question for you, we fire drink and hire another coach, what happens if he is worse than drink?


I think the funniest part about this whole drink movement is the fact that his SEC record is about as good as we're gonna get if we're being honest. About .500 in SEC with a few OOC is really where we made our mark a program. there will be some years with high success marks and some with lower, but about even.

I think at times we forget Drink wins 8ish games in year 1, and 7 games last year with a full squad against Army.

Im down on Drink right now, pretty pissed off to be honest. But man our fans can be harsh.
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

That is just silly. It doesn't matter who the prospects are. If a change is required to improve things, you make the change. Any change could be bad or it could be good. You dont avoid change because of fear of the unknown.


But you DO avoid change 4 games into the 3rd season, especially when the guy is the best recruiter you’ve EVER had.

It’s over emotional nonsense.

The “I don’t want to hear about Pinkel” response doesn’t make the Pinkel comparison any less valid.

You clowns would have run him off also had you the authority to do so.

Sillier still, the only reason this is even a discussion is because our kicker missed a 26 yard field goal and our RB dropped the ball on the half yard line. Had either of those not happened none of this talk would be occurring right now and that’s a fact.
Posted by Mizzou Mule
St. Charles County, Missou-rah
Member since Sep 2014
3072 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 4:12 pm to
I haven't based my opinion on one game. I've been to every home game and watch each away game on the tube. When you can't sub second string against ACU, red light. When you can't get a push against LA Tech's DL, red light. Should I talk about that KSU beauty???

Drink is over-his-head just like Odom. Drink can recruit a little better cause he is full of it.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
17954 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

But you DO avoid change 4 games into the 3rd season, especially when the guy is the best recruiter you’ve EVER had.


I missed the thread saying Drink should be fired right now. Can you point us to it? Thanks.

Best recruiter? Have you noticed the recruiting fell off a cliff when his lead recruiting assistant left? You may be giving the wrong person credit.

Pinkel's time had run its course. Sure many folks would like to find another Pinkel but dont let that make you think Pinkel should have stayed on.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111498 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 4:15 pm to
There’s plenty of people arguing to fire him now. Even at the end of this season would be a mistake, IMO.
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

I missed the thread saying Drink should be fired right now.


You’re literally positing in it my guy.

quote:

Best recruiter? Have you noticed the recruiting fell off a cliff when his lead recruiting assistant left?


Yes, best recruiter and BY FAR. Falling off a cliff? Lol, this will still be a top 25 class by star avg once it’s said and done. He’ll have 3 of the top 4 classes in program history in 3 full recruiting cycles. Don’t be daft.

quote:

Pinkel's time had run its course. Sure many folks would like to find another Pinkel but dont let that make you think Pinkel should have stayed on.


People aren’t talking about the end of Pinkel’s tenure (but of course we would be better off had he stayed), we are talking about the beginning where the morons were calling for his firing in year 3 and year 4. The same people doing it now as if they never learn
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

I haven't based my opinion on one game


You would not be on here saying he should be fired if we were 3-1 and coming of a road SEC win.

If you deny that you are a liar as well
Posted by McMillan
Member since Jul 2018
5874 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 4:33 pm to
You know who could recruit his arse off ? Chad Morris. This four eyed clown is him times ten.
This post was edited on 9/26/22 at 4:33 pm
Posted by McMillan
Member since Jul 2018
5874 posts
Posted on 9/26/22 at 4:34 pm to
He's a great bullsh..um salesman. I'll give him that. That's his true calling.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter