Started By
Message
I expect BO’s extension to be similar to Campbell
Posted on 11/27/17 at 6:27 pm
Posted on 11/27/17 at 6:27 pm
LINK
The only number that really matters is the buyout, which probably won’t change much for BO. Which would still allow Sterk to fire BO if Mizzou has a bad year next season.
quote:
Excited to announce Matt Campbell has agreed to a new six-year contract worth $22.5M. Matt's annual salary will increase from $2.1M to $3.5M. We will also increase the football staff's annual compensation by $1M. Go Cyclones! #raisethestandard
The only number that really matters is the buyout, which probably won’t change much for BO. Which would still allow Sterk to fire BO if Mizzou has a bad year next season.
2
Posted on 11/27/17 at 6:51 pm to wubilli
Didn't Iowa St. beat Oklahoma this year?
Posted on 11/27/17 at 7:04 pm to Zou brownmajic
ISU has the same record as Mizzou.
Extensions are only important as a recruiting tool. It’s easy to fire a coach if he underperforms. BO met expectations this year, so will get rewarded. If he falls on his face next season, the extension will not prevent him from being fired.
Extensions are only important as a recruiting tool. It’s easy to fire a coach if he underperforms. BO met expectations this year, so will get rewarded. If he falls on his face next season, the extension will not prevent him from being fired.
Posted on 11/27/17 at 7:27 pm to Zou brownmajic
They sure did, and TCU...but after that they pretty much fell on their face down the stretch going 1-3 to finish the season. I really hope we get them in a bowl.
I'd expect BO to get a slight raise. More money in the asst pool and the extension to not drastically change his current buyout which is essentially nothing.
I'd expect BO to get a slight raise. More money in the asst pool and the extension to not drastically change his current buyout which is essentially nothing.
Posted on 11/27/17 at 10:15 pm to JesusQuintana
Posted on 11/27/17 at 10:28 pm to Zou brownmajic
And their attendance went up, not down.
I do expect Barry to get a slight raise and an extension. He’s earned that. There’s no reason to give him a $1M/year raise.
I do expect Barry to get a slight raise and an extension. He’s earned that. There’s no reason to give him a $1M/year raise.
Posted on 11/27/17 at 10:48 pm to the808bass
I would bet attendance will be up next season.
Attendance at Mizzou is usually a year behind on field results. If Lock and TBJ come back Mizzou will be a top 20-30 team next preseason.
Attendance at Mizzou is usually a year behind on field results. If Lock and TBJ come back Mizzou will be a top 20-30 team next preseason.
Posted on 11/27/17 at 11:38 pm to wubilli
And that’s when you can give him a bigger raise. Not after we’ve bled $6M from our football ticket sales.
Posted on 11/28/17 at 12:35 am to the808bass
More important to increase the assistant pool. LSUs dline coach just retired. Not sure Bebe would hire Haley away but Odom needs to pay him enough to stay.
Posted on 11/28/17 at 5:42 am to navynuke
quote:
More important to increase the assistant pool
Huepel Elerbee and Haley should be the focus
BO isn't going anywhere. Let's lock down the assistance THEN give Odom something
Posted on 11/28/17 at 6:41 am to the808bass
quote:
And that’s when you can give him a bigger raise. Not after we’ve bled $6M from our football ticket sales.
Let him go above 500 as a coach
Let him beat a team over 500
Let him get a big win
Let him show consistency
Then he's earned a raise.
Posted on 11/28/17 at 6:52 am to SemperFi
Does it really matter, all that matters is the buy out when you fire him.
I really don't get this "well recruits want to see he will be there their entire time".
What does that have to do with a contract these days? Coaches get fired or take other jobs without ever getting near their contract obligations.
This whole "he needs to be signed for 4 years thing" is a fallacy.
I really don't get this "well recruits want to see he will be there their entire time".
What does that have to do with a contract these days? Coaches get fired or take other jobs without ever getting near their contract obligations.
This whole "he needs to be signed for 4 years thing" is a fallacy.
Posted on 11/28/17 at 7:16 am to TigerCruise
It's about having a solid rebuttal against negative recruiting. A coaches contract is even lower fruit than a bad season. One less thing to have to defend when you are in someone's living room.
Posted on 11/28/17 at 7:23 am to navynuke
quote:
It's about having a solid rebuttal against negative recruiting
Negative recruiting?
BO's
record
fan attendance for games
inability to beat 500 and above teams
2 year record is sub 500
How does an extension help with the above in recruiting?
I guess my point it. If I am a recruiter going against BO, I have plenty of other things to nail him on...... An extension or no extension would be well back on my list
This post was edited on 11/28/17 at 7:28 am
Posted on 11/28/17 at 7:48 am to SemperFi
"We struggled at the beginning of the year,made changes and won 6 straight. The University is committed long-term to what we are doing. Here is how you fit into our plan.". It ends that discussion and turns focus back on the player, which is what they want anyway.
This post was edited on 11/28/17 at 7:50 am
Posted on 11/28/17 at 7:58 am to navynuke
quote:
It ends that discussion and turns focus back on the player, which is what they want anyway.
Makes sense.. Thanks Nuke
Posted on 11/28/17 at 7:58 am to navynuke
If an extension is designed to help him recruit then I expect him to get better recruits. Right now hes recruiting kids who have offers from non p5 conferences or low level p5 programs. If he's recruiting "diamonds in the rough" types an extension doesnt help. If he's going to get a few 4 star dbs then im cool with it. Mizzou should extend the guy who makes the schedule. That guy lined up 2 cupcakes and 3 dumpster fires at just the right time.
Posted on 11/28/17 at 8:11 am to surgicalvenom
It's living room season and that stability is important when you aren't selling being a blue blood. With the amount of coaching turnover, they have time to flip some 4* players.
Posted on 11/28/17 at 8:36 am to navynuke
My point is an extension doesn't matter. You could give him a 10 year contract but if the buyout is only $2 mil then it's irrelevant.
Do what you have to for recruiting, but from my perspective it really doesn't matter how many years he has. Now if you extend him for 6 and he has a $20 mil buyout I'll be upset.
Do what you have to for recruiting, but from my perspective it really doesn't matter how many years he has. Now if you extend him for 6 and he has a $20 mil buyout I'll be upset.
Posted on 11/28/17 at 8:39 am to surgicalvenom
quote:
If an extension is designed to help him recruit then I expect him to get better recruits. Right now hes recruiting kids who have offers from non p5 conferences or low level p5 programs.
Absolutely. Recruiting talent that most P5 programs didn't even look at doesn't do much for the program...... Other then providing cannon fodder for pumpers on the MB's.
Land talent. Not roster fillers.
Hopefully if we win our Bowl, we could flip some of that instate talent that left... That would be a good start
quote:
Mizzou should extend the guy who makes the schedule. That guy lined up 2 cupcakes and 3 dumpster fires at just the right time
He couldn't do that again if he tried lol
I'm not sure about anyone else here.... I had no clue Florida and tenner would be the shite shows they were this year.
Curious to see how we do against our bowl opponent.
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News