Started By
Message
SI : 'Only Thing in Alabama's Way Is Alabama': Can Anyone Beat the Tide? Anonymous Coaches
Posted on 12/20/20 at 3:44 pm
Posted on 12/20/20 at 3:44 pm
SI - Anonymous Coaches Talk Playoff
ATLANTA — Nick Saban kept repeating the jersey numbers: 84 and 1. Eighty-four and one.
He was referring to Florida’s most explosive receiving threats, the two players who gave his Alabama team the most trouble during its 52–46 SEC championship game win here Saturday night: tight end Kyle Pitts (84) and versatile wideout Kadarius Toney (1). They are “serious mismatches”—Saban’s words—who combined for 15 catches, 282 yards and two touchdowns against his secondary.
In using Pitts and Toney as they did, the Gators created the closest thing to a blueprint on beating the Crimson Tide. And still, they lost.
So, can it be done?
Can anyone topple Alabama?
“No,” says one SEC assistant. “Come on now.”
A half-dozen FBS coaches spoke anonymously to Sports Illustrated on Sunday about the College Football Playoff. The discussion quickly evolved into the dominance of the Tide, which completed one of the best regular seasons in college football history, winning 11 consecutive SEC games by an average of about four touchdowns. Just one of the games—the latest one—was a one-possession outcome.
The group of six coaches universally agree on two things: (1) the Tide should win it all and (2) of the teams in the playoff, only Clemson is capable of knocking off Saban’s team.
Even a Big Ten coach believes that No. 3 seed Ohio State doesn’t have the offensive firepower to keep up with Alabama. He believes only Clemson can exploit the weaknesses of Bama’s defense like Florida did.
A Group of Five head coach agreed, but for a different reason.
“I don’t know enough about Ohio State,” he says, “because you’ve only seen them six times.”
“I’ve watched Ohio State on film and they don’t seem like they’re playing at a high level offensively,” adds the Big Ten coach. “I don’t see them causing the matchup issues.”
So who can? Coaches believe two players are skilled enough to cause Alabama serious matchup problems like Florida’s Pitts and Toney, and they both play for the same team: Clemson. Quarterback Trevor Lawrence and running back Travis Etienne can each exploit a defense through the air—Lawrence passing and Etienne catching—and on the ground.
“I think Etienne and Trevor Lawrence running is a matchup issue,” says the Big Ten coach.
Says the Group of Five head coach: “Trevor Lawrence gives anyone a shot.”
Lawrence possesses ingredients that have troubled Alabama’s defense in the past—a dual-threat, long-ball passer who isn’t afraid to launch deep balls and sprint for long gains. Etienne and Lawrence give Clemson something Florida lacked: a running game. The Gators ran for 54 yards on 26 carries.
Alabama’s offensive evolution has come at a price, says one coach: its defense has regressed. He suggested that may be rooted in the unit practicing daily against an offense that leans more on a spread, pass-heavy attack. “You wonder if that’s affecting them,” he says.
According to two coaches, the Tide’s defense is lacking in two areas that used to always be a strength for it. Their safeties aren’t as strong as normal and they lack an elite pass rusher.
Saturday’s result—Bama allowed 462 yards and 46 points—had one Big Ten coach questioning the Tide’s defensive improvements from earlier this season to the last month.
“After making strides, you have to ask the question: ‘Is the defense fixed?’” he says.
Another SEC assistant defends the Tide’s defense. It’s the nature of this era of football.
“The days of giving up 21 points are over, so people will score points on them,” he says. And as they proved Saturday, the Tide can now score with them.
But no team in the playoff field has exactly what Florida has from a matchup perspective; certainly not Notre Dame, which meets Alabama in a CFP semifinal in Arlington on Jan. 1. From there, the Tide would get the Ohio State–Clemson winner in the championship game in Miami.
Soon, we’ll know if any team can re-construct Florida’s blueprint. But Nos. 84 and 1 aren’t walking through their door.
“If they stay healthy, the only chance people have to beat them is catching them on the perfect storm day where things just don’t go well,” one FBS head coach said. “Only thing in Alabama’s way is Alabama.”
ATLANTA — Nick Saban kept repeating the jersey numbers: 84 and 1. Eighty-four and one.
He was referring to Florida’s most explosive receiving threats, the two players who gave his Alabama team the most trouble during its 52–46 SEC championship game win here Saturday night: tight end Kyle Pitts (84) and versatile wideout Kadarius Toney (1). They are “serious mismatches”—Saban’s words—who combined for 15 catches, 282 yards and two touchdowns against his secondary.
In using Pitts and Toney as they did, the Gators created the closest thing to a blueprint on beating the Crimson Tide. And still, they lost.
So, can it be done?
Can anyone topple Alabama?
“No,” says one SEC assistant. “Come on now.”
A half-dozen FBS coaches spoke anonymously to Sports Illustrated on Sunday about the College Football Playoff. The discussion quickly evolved into the dominance of the Tide, which completed one of the best regular seasons in college football history, winning 11 consecutive SEC games by an average of about four touchdowns. Just one of the games—the latest one—was a one-possession outcome.
The group of six coaches universally agree on two things: (1) the Tide should win it all and (2) of the teams in the playoff, only Clemson is capable of knocking off Saban’s team.
Even a Big Ten coach believes that No. 3 seed Ohio State doesn’t have the offensive firepower to keep up with Alabama. He believes only Clemson can exploit the weaknesses of Bama’s defense like Florida did.
A Group of Five head coach agreed, but for a different reason.
“I don’t know enough about Ohio State,” he says, “because you’ve only seen them six times.”
“I’ve watched Ohio State on film and they don’t seem like they’re playing at a high level offensively,” adds the Big Ten coach. “I don’t see them causing the matchup issues.”
So who can? Coaches believe two players are skilled enough to cause Alabama serious matchup problems like Florida’s Pitts and Toney, and they both play for the same team: Clemson. Quarterback Trevor Lawrence and running back Travis Etienne can each exploit a defense through the air—Lawrence passing and Etienne catching—and on the ground.
“I think Etienne and Trevor Lawrence running is a matchup issue,” says the Big Ten coach.
Says the Group of Five head coach: “Trevor Lawrence gives anyone a shot.”
Lawrence possesses ingredients that have troubled Alabama’s defense in the past—a dual-threat, long-ball passer who isn’t afraid to launch deep balls and sprint for long gains. Etienne and Lawrence give Clemson something Florida lacked: a running game. The Gators ran for 54 yards on 26 carries.
Alabama’s offensive evolution has come at a price, says one coach: its defense has regressed. He suggested that may be rooted in the unit practicing daily against an offense that leans more on a spread, pass-heavy attack. “You wonder if that’s affecting them,” he says.
According to two coaches, the Tide’s defense is lacking in two areas that used to always be a strength for it. Their safeties aren’t as strong as normal and they lack an elite pass rusher.
Saturday’s result—Bama allowed 462 yards and 46 points—had one Big Ten coach questioning the Tide’s defensive improvements from earlier this season to the last month.
“After making strides, you have to ask the question: ‘Is the defense fixed?’” he says.
Another SEC assistant defends the Tide’s defense. It’s the nature of this era of football.
“The days of giving up 21 points are over, so people will score points on them,” he says. And as they proved Saturday, the Tide can now score with them.
But no team in the playoff field has exactly what Florida has from a matchup perspective; certainly not Notre Dame, which meets Alabama in a CFP semifinal in Arlington on Jan. 1. From there, the Tide would get the Ohio State–Clemson winner in the championship game in Miami.
Soon, we’ll know if any team can re-construct Florida’s blueprint. But Nos. 84 and 1 aren’t walking through their door.
“If they stay healthy, the only chance people have to beat them is catching them on the perfect storm day where things just don’t go well,” one FBS head coach said. “Only thing in Alabama’s way is Alabama.”
Posted on 12/20/20 at 3:48 pm to SummerOfGeorge
If we had Waddle & Dickerson, I’d say we are the clear favorite.
Clemson will be another war though.
Clemson will be another war though.
Posted on 12/20/20 at 3:50 pm to FairhopeTider
quote:
If we had Waddle & Dickerson, I’d say we are the clear favorite.
Clemson will be another war though.
I think there is, I don't think comfort is the word but at least preparation, to going into a game with Clemson knowing that we are going to have to just keep scoring.
I don't think players or fans will be confused - the expectation to win the game will be that the offense scores and scores and scores. There won't be any "oh no, we're giving up points". I mean, it'll piss me off, but I completely understand it is going to happen.
That has not been the case in the past. The offense will know exactly what it's job is - and I trust those dudes to do it against anybody. It will be a fvckin slobberknocker.
Posted on 12/20/20 at 3:51 pm to FairhopeTider
Clemson is the team that will be the toughest match up because of Etienne. They're balanced and Brent Venables always throws different looks at our offense that cause problems. That game two years ago was so frustrating because we moved the ball but self destructed inside the red zone.
Posted on 12/20/20 at 4:07 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
The offense will know exactly what it's job is
That’s why we need Sark to not take the AU job. We need all hands on deck to be locked in.
Posted on 12/20/20 at 4:09 pm to FairhopeTider
quote:
That’s why we need Sark to not take the AU job. We need all hands on deck to be locked in.
Yea that's definitely my underlying fear right now.
Posted on 12/20/20 at 4:09 pm to FairhopeTider
I hope and pray that he stays away from that shithole.
Posted on 12/20/20 at 6:22 pm to Dplymkr88
I want to see the offense without Dickerson in the middle before I go crowning us.
Losing Waddle really hurt, but the offensive balance provided by the run game mitigated the hit.
If Waddle doesn’t play there is a huge question whether we are as efficient as we were, especially against teams with elite defenses like ND and Clemson.
Losing Waddle really hurt, but the offensive balance provided by the run game mitigated the hit.
If Waddle doesn’t play there is a huge question whether we are as efficient as we were, especially against teams with elite defenses like ND and Clemson.
Posted on 12/20/20 at 7:33 pm to SummerOfGeorge
I do think we lack the elite play at safety that we've always seemed to have in the past. That and Moses regressing.
Posted on 12/20/20 at 8:30 pm to Chad4Bama
I’ll be honest, I see Clemson as the favorite. We should get by ND (although I don’t think it will be the cakewalk some seem to think) but Clemson has had our number. They beat our arse two years ago and they have the best QB in the country and a freak athlete at RB. Their defense is always aggressive as hell and well schemed. Without 69 and 17, you have to sort of Clemson. It will take one hell of a game from this Bama team to pull that one out. We need Sark to have his head in the game and getting 17 back for the natty would be huge.
Posted on 12/20/20 at 10:09 pm to FairhopeTider
quote:we are clearly better than Clemson on offense and I don’t think it’s very close.
If we had Waddle & Dickerson, I’d say we are the clear favorite. Clemson will be another war though.
This post was edited on 12/20/20 at 10:10 pm
Posted on 12/20/20 at 10:11 pm to narddogg81
quote:
we are clearly better than Clemson on offense and I don’t think it’s very close.
Yeah but the opposite is true of the defenses.
Posted on 12/20/20 at 10:12 pm to biclops
quote:Clemson has had some stickers on d this season too. First Norte dame game, and BC. Florida is a Carly better offense than acting Clemson has played
Yeah but the opposite is true of the defenses.
Posted on 12/21/20 at 6:14 am to narddogg81
quote:
First Norte dame game, and BC.
These games were back-to-back, and Clemson had several defensive starters out vs ND due to COVID. I would be surprised if they weren't missing a few against BC the week prior as well.
And the ND game was double OT. Even with those starters out, it's not like they gave up 47 (or even 35) in regulation.
This post was edited on 12/21/20 at 6:17 am
Posted on 12/21/20 at 7:21 am to narddogg81
quote:
we are clearly better than Clemson on offense and I don’t think it’s very close.
But the offenses don’t line up and play against each other. They have the horses to keep up if they play our defense.
Posted on 12/21/20 at 9:20 am to FairhopeTider
We have 3 possible Heisman finalists with one probably going to win it and now our offense is not good of enough to win the NC 

Posted on 12/21/20 at 10:00 am to TideWarrior
It’s not the offense that will get us beat. We had to hold on against a Florida team that got stopped by a bunch of freshmen vs LSU. All I can say is hang on.
Posted on 12/21/20 at 10:36 am to XenScott
quote:
It’s not the offense that will get us beat. We had to hold on against a Florida team that got stopped by a bunch of freshmen vs LSU. All I can say is hang on.
Stopped? Trask threw for 474 yards against LSU...and that was without Kyle Pitts playing. He also threw two picks (one of which was a fluke) in LSU territory...
Posted on 12/21/20 at 11:39 am to TideWarrior
quote:
our offense is not good of enough to win the NC
Nobody said that - of course we are good enough to win. However, we are not good enough that the NC is a foregone conclusion or even that we should be drastic favorites over a team with as good a defense as Clemson's.
This post was edited on 12/21/20 at 11:40 am
Latest Alabama News
Popular
Back to top
