Started By
Message

What are the chances the SEC moves to pod scheduling?

Posted on 2/2/20 at 11:05 am
Posted by drexyl
Mingovia
Member since Sep 2005
23084 posts
Posted on 2/2/20 at 11:05 am
LINK

There was talk during the season about the SEC rethinking the divisions and inter-divisional matchups - this would be a great solution to keep most people happy.
Posted by DownSouthJukin
Coaching Changes Board
Member since Jan 2014
27572 posts
Posted on 2/2/20 at 11:07 am to
Zero in a bazillion in the next 5 years. 1 in a bazillion after that.
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
96382 posts
Posted on 2/2/20 at 11:08 am to
Zero
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42582 posts
Posted on 2/2/20 at 1:20 pm to
Zero. AU/UA/UGA/UT will need to schedule their rivalry games an OOC. It isnt really conducive with 14 teams to construct a conference around those teams.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
81160 posts
Posted on 2/2/20 at 2:02 pm to
Zero unless the conference expands to 16.
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29184 posts
Posted on 2/2/20 at 7:03 pm to
As long as Big 12 teams routinely make the playoffs with one loss, I don’t think the SEC should change anything. The current setup allows us to get two teams in.

If the rest of college football wasn’t so shitty relative to the SEC, and the committee was willing to rank a two loss SEC team over a one less team from another conference, I’d be for the three permanent opponents and then rotating 5 other model.
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
7388 posts
Posted on 2/3/20 at 12:30 am to
This topic is 1 of the most talked about on this board.

Honestly, there's not a good format that works with 14 teams & the required rivalry CONF. games.

- You can't switch divisions because that'll make 1 side either too heavy OR possibly eliminate 1 (or more) rivalries.
- SEC WON'T play these rivalry games as non-conf. games.
- There is NO FAIR format that allows some teams to keep c-d games & others not.
- The link you posted won't work unless you switch some of the teams around.
- Non-division requires numerous tie-breakers to compare every team to each other due to lack of common opponents.
- 9 conf. games creates the dreaded 4H/5A & 4A/5H issue...which, as I've pointed out before, hurts schools (like UGA) who have an in-state OOC rival & requires 7H/season. (10 conf. games makes that even worse.)
- How do you determine who should be in the CG from whatever plan you decide upon?

As I've stated in the past, the SEC SHOULD HAVE looked @ scheduling WHEN they decided to increase the conf. members. Unfortunately, the easier paths in scheduling require adding 2 or removing 2 teams. &, just my take, I feel like the P5 will be the P4 & everybody gaining new members in the new future.
This post was edited on 2/3/20 at 12:39 am
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30671 posts
Posted on 2/3/20 at 6:58 am to
Slim.



You have to keep the big6 continuity for cross div games.

It adds three more worthwhile games tk an already awesome sec slate

LSU-fla
Ut-bama
AU-Uga


This post was edited on 2/3/20 at 6:59 am
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 2/3/20 at 10:01 am to
Can someone please explain to me why there needs to be a change? It seems like it's working just fine as it is.

Thanks,

Reigning SEC Champions
Posted by NorthshoreTiger76
Pelicans, Saints, & LSU Fan
Member since May 2009
80308 posts
Posted on 2/4/20 at 7:14 am to
Zero
Posted by StopRobot
Mobile, AL
Member since May 2013
15447 posts
Posted on 2/4/20 at 8:06 am to
LSU fans think this is a fair system because they would be the only Big 6 school not to have two other Big 6 schools in their pod
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter