Started By
Message
Posted on 1/21/20 at 1:17 pm to Irons Puppet
It’s better to use emojis when the best you can come up with is miss st was ranked high at one point in 2014, which means they are always awesome.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 1:18 pm to Irons Puppet
I’ve been giving you a hard time, but I do agree that the majority of years recently the West has been better than the East. I just don’t buy that that is the reason Auburn plays so terribly against Georgia.
Both facts can be true. The West has been better than the East most years over the past decade. Auburn’s terrible record against UGA is not due to the West’s strength.
I know you don’t like these numbers, but they still aren’t getting addressed by any backup school fans.
From 2009 to present day:
Auburn vs. SEC East 12-13
Auburn vs. SEC West 38-27
Both facts can be true. The West has been better than the East most years over the past decade. Auburn’s terrible record against UGA is not due to the West’s strength.
I know you don’t like these numbers, but they still aren’t getting addressed by any backup school fans.
From 2009 to present day:
Auburn vs. SEC East 12-13
Auburn vs. SEC West 38-27
This post was edited on 1/21/20 at 1:19 pm
Posted on 1/21/20 at 1:20 pm to dhuck20
quote:
Gus has lost 5 in a row vs the East.
quote:
Gus has lost 5 in a row vs the East.
quote:
Gus has lost 5 in a row vs the East.
quote:
Gus has lost 5 in a row vs the East.
quote:
Gus has lost 5 in a row vs the East.
quote:
Gus has lost 5 in a row vs the East.
Just thought I'd reiterate since Irons seems hung up on "muh west"
Posted on 1/21/20 at 1:22 pm to dhuck20
In all fairness, 4 of those 5 losses were to top-10 teams. I still don't know WTF happened vs. UT last year, but I'll chalk it up to Pruitt owning Malzahn's offense.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 1:26 pm to ValDawgsta
quote:
I’ve been giving you a hard time, but I do agree that the majority of years recently the West has been better than the East. I just don’t buy that that is the reason Auburn plays so terribly against Georgia.
My argument has been AU has faded at the end of the season and why Novembers performances have been an issue for most of Gus's teams. It might be due to depth or it might be due to Gus's coaching ability or ADD. Like I posted before, Gus is 12-16 over the last 4 games against Division I opponents. Some of the loses to UGA are unexplainable, but so are some of his Bowl loses. Nine of those SECE loses were to UGA and that is why moving the game to October is big.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 1:30 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
SEC Teams that have been in the CFP Poll top 4:
SECE: UGA
SECW: Bama, LSU, AU, MSU, OLE Miss
SEC teams that have made the CFP. MSU and OM both flopped that year.
SECE: UGA
SECW: Bama, LSU
Carry on back to your terrible trolling and shitty posting
Posted on 1/21/20 at 1:30 pm to ValDawgsta
quote:
just don’t buy that that is the reason Auburn plays so terribly against Georgia.
No doubt it’s an incredibly flawed excuse by irons
Posted on 1/21/20 at 1:38 pm to djsdawg
quote:
It’s better to use emojis when the best you can come up with is miss st was ranked high at one point in 2014, which means they are always awesome.
They were very physical every year. When you play them compared to Vandy or UK, you will feel the long term effects. Same with Ole Miss under Freeze and Ark under Petrino and Bert. I like to use the Clemson comparison, because it is true with UGA, except without the same results in wins and loses.
This post was edited on 1/21/20 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 1/21/20 at 1:41 pm to djsdawg
quote:
No doubt it’s an incredibly flawed excuse by irons
We will see come October if it makes a difference. Then again the following year in JHS. The UGAs will be bitching about moving it back by then.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 1:46 pm to Irons Puppet
Winning % rank 2015-19:
38 Aggies
49 miss st
76 miss
106 ark
Sorry, that’s not the gauntlet you claim it is.
38 Aggies
49 miss st
76 miss
106 ark
Sorry, that’s not the gauntlet you claim it is.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 1:48 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Winning % rank 2015-19:
38 Aggies
49 miss st
76 miss
106 ark
Sorry, that’s not the gauntlet you claim it is.
Do the 10 years we were discussing. Also show the East.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 2:00 pm to Irons Puppet
The 5 year comparison proves the point just fine:
50 uk
56 vols
77 mizzou
86 sc
103 vandy
As you can see, neither uga or Au had a very hard sec slate before we played.
50 uk
56 vols
77 mizzou
86 sc
103 vandy
As you can see, neither uga or Au had a very hard sec slate before we played.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 2:03 pm to djsdawg
Ten years. Crickets.
This post was edited on 1/21/20 at 2:12 pm
Posted on 1/21/20 at 2:07 pm to Irons Puppet
Burden is on you to find a way to dispute the 2015-19 comparison.
Bama coming after uga really hurts your excuse claim.
Bama coming after uga really hurts your excuse claim.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 2:11 pm to djsdawg
The fact that UK got better at the expense of UT helps those numbers. The better sample size is ten years and you know it. It is what we were discussing in UGA 9-3 run. UGA fans are the only ones arguing otherwise.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 2:15 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
Damn, the East is tougher than I thought ?
I'm agreeing with you ya dumbass.
The East isnt tough with Vandy, Tennessee (worst decade in their history), Missouri, and Kentucky.
The evidence is that all of those teams have the same record against UGA over the past 10 years as Auburn.
Auburn is the equivalent of GT, Vandy, Tennessees worst decade in history, Mizzou, and Kentucky.
All of those teams including Auburn are the equivalent to a middling ACC school.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 2:16 pm to Irons Puppet
So we have to go back to 2006 as that’s when we asserted dominance?
There is nothing wrong with a 5 year comparison. 2015 is long ago as it is.
If only y’all played bama before uga, then you might have a legit excuse to use.
There is nothing wrong with a 5 year comparison. 2015 is long ago as it is.
If only y’all played bama before uga, then you might have a legit excuse to use.
Posted on 1/21/20 at 2:20 pm to djsdawg
We are waiting for the stats to prove your point. So far just selective stats to try and convince the naive.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News