Started By
Message
re: For The Record, Who Wants Mike Anderson Fired
Posted on 2/19/19 at 1:59 pm to YumYum Sauce
Posted on 2/19/19 at 1:59 pm to YumYum Sauce
quote:
I never will understand this argument.
Agreed, if a coach doesn't want to come here currently he won't at the end of next year because of the roster outlook.
0
Posted on 2/19/19 at 3:57 pm to Stonehog
quote:
Read the rest of the sentence.
If having a lottery pick on the roster was a prerequisite for a coach making a move, it would rarely happen.
A coach believes his skillset and theory will be successful at a school so he takes the job. Oh and money.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:28 pm to YumYum Sauce
Having a lottery pick isn't a prerequisite, but I don't think a good coach will want a rebuilding project right off the bat either. Add an angry fanbase to the mix and the job starts to look less attractive.
Is that why coaching searches are always so easy?
quote:
A coach believes his skillset and theory will be successful at a school so he takes the job. Oh and money.
Is that why coaching searches are always so easy?
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:49 pm to Drewbie
quote:
This is the biggest feather in DVH's cap, IMO. When bats were hot pre 09 we played Gorilla Ball with the best of them. When the bats were dead he recruited one of the most complete college pitching staffs ever and they responded with a historic team ERA. Fast forward to a little bit of life put back into the bats and changed to the harder MLB ball and here we are leading the SEC in offense again. He constantly has a finger on the pulse of the game.
This is an underrated take.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:00 pm to Stonehog
It will still be a rebuild next year after Mike fails to bring in any worthwhile big men, especially at the 5. And fans will be angrier after we have a losing season next year and wonder why Mike wasn’t fired sooner.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 7:09 pm to Stonehog
I guess you just want us to hold up on making a move until we have a class full of talented seniors that have the potential to make some noise nationally? Only change coaches when the current coach has a championship team built? Makes tons of sense.
If that's your recommendation then we should've done that last year.
If that's your recommendation then we should've done that last year.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 9:07 pm to dammitbert
quote:
I guess you just want us to hold up on making a move until we have a class full of talented seniors that have the potential to make some noise nationally?
I just said wait one more year.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 10:00 pm to Stonehog
There’s never a perfect time to fire a coach. You do it then deal with the immediate impact and hope the rebuild is quick, just like we are doing in football. Delaying the inevitable is a waste of everybody’s time.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 10:08 pm
Posted on 2/20/19 at 8:09 am to Latarian
quote:
just like we are doing in football.
Because that's going so well.
Posted on 2/20/19 at 8:18 am to Stonehog
quote:
I just said wait one more year.
frick that. It makes no sense to do that when nothing will change.
This post was edited on 2/20/19 at 8:19 am
Posted on 2/20/19 at 8:51 am to Stonehog
quote:
I just said wait one more year.
Yeah and you first reasoning for it didn't make sense. If all you said was because of the buyout then that would be one thing.
Posted on 2/20/19 at 9:12 am to Stonehog
quote:WOAH WOAH WOAH. HOLD THE frick UP, YOU MIKE ANDERSON COCK GOBBLER. ALL frickING YEAR ALL IVE HEARD IS HOW YOUNG THIS frickING TEAM IS AND THATS WHY WE SUCK BUT NOW YOUR ARGUMENT FOR WHY WE WOULDNT BE ABLE TO GET A GOOD COACH FOR NEXT YEAR IS BECAUSE WE WOULDNT HAVE ANY TALENT???? WHICH frickING ONE IS IT BECAUSE IT CANT BE frickING BOTH DIPSHIT!! YES YOU HAVE frickING TRIGGERED ME
Having a lottery pick isn't a prerequisite, but I don't think a good coach will want a rebuilding project right off the bat either
Posted on 2/20/19 at 9:13 am to Stonehog
quote:
Because that's going so well.
Hence why I said deal with immediate impact. We could’ve kept Bert another year and gone what, 4-8 again? Then what? We would’ve wasted another year of recruiting and implementing a new system.
I find it interesting that you’ll give Anderson 8 years but won’t give Morris 2. Again, agenda, you just won’t admit what that is.
This post was edited on 2/20/19 at 9:18 am
Posted on 2/20/19 at 9:35 am to Hawgnsincebirth55
quote:
ALL frickING YEAR ALL IVE HEARD IS HOW YOUNG THIS frickING TEAM IS AND THATS WHY WE SUCK BUT NOW YOUR ARGUMENT FOR WHY WE WOULDNT BE ABLE TO GET A GOOD COACH FOR NEXT YEAR IS BECAUSE WE WOULDNT HAVE ANY TALENT????
Why do you guys go to such extremes? It's like all or nothing with some of you. I never said he wouldn't have any talent, but it will be young talent and there would be transfers. He would be starting from scratch, and I don't think the fanbase is patient enough for that. I'd rather not have a Chad Morris type year in basketball.
Posted on 2/20/19 at 9:36 am to Stonehog
quote:
Why do you guys go to such extremes?
You mean like wanting a coach fired after his first season?
Posted on 2/20/19 at 9:38 am to Latarian
Not sure anyone has argued for that.
Posted on 2/20/19 at 9:38 am to Latarian
I find it interesting that Alabama and Texas A&M are ready to pull the plug on their coaches for performing about as well as, if not better than, Mike.
This post was edited on 2/20/19 at 9:42 am
Posted on 2/20/19 at 9:42 am to Stonehog
There’s one in this thread and his initials are STL. You have done nothing but take shots at everything Morris has done. Blamed him for a terrible first class that he had two weeks to sign, give zero credit for signing a good class despite only winning 2 games. Won’t look realistically at what he inherited and is trying to do (just like he did at SMU) Just “he only won 2 games!?! He sucks, etc”
Posted on 2/20/19 at 9:48 am to Stonehog
quote:
Not sure anyone has argued for that.
Posted on 2/20/19 at 9:52 am to Latarian
quote:
You mean like wanting a coach fired after his first season?
Page 8 of 11
Latest Arkansas News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News