Started By
Message
SEC Network has no peer
Posted on 5/5/17 at 9:57 pm
Posted on 5/5/17 at 9:57 pm
11
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:03 pm to RocketBallz
It's just a shame it has to be linked to that crap bag of a station ESPN. It stands alone as far as I'm concerned.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:05 pm to RocketBallz
Get rid of Paul Finebaum.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:05 pm to RocketBallz
Texas AnM and Mizzou brought all that revenue.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:21 pm to RocketBallz
SECN+ at A&M kind of sucked. I assume the audio was from their radio feed. Camera angles often missed important stuff. But, it's still better than just radio.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:45 pm to RocketBallz
Espn is taking that money though. They are a huge help in distributing and getting high rates. What matters is what the schools get
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:49 pm to RocketBallz
Wow. More than ten times the value of the PAC 12 Network.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:58 pm to RocketBallz
It's because it's actually about sports and not Marxists yelling about what's racist and who has the best outfit.
ETA: And because SEC sports are much better than any other conference's and we actually support them
ETA: And because SEC sports are much better than any other conference's and we actually support them
This post was edited on 5/5/17 at 11:00 pm
Posted on 5/6/17 at 4:11 am to RocketBallz
The football commentating has taken a turn toward being even shittier since Tebow left.
Booger needs to be run off. He has an agenda and I haven't heard an original thought from him in a long time.
When the NFL #1 draft pick refuses to interview with Booger, that is a big red flag.
Booger needs to be run off. He has an agenda and I haven't heard an original thought from him in a long time.
When the NFL #1 draft pick refuses to interview with Booger, that is a big red flag.
Posted on 5/6/17 at 4:51 am to RocketBallz
I can honestly say I love the network! Trying to watch a different conference is painful as hell.
It's evolving still and will only get better.
It's evolving still and will only get better.
Posted on 5/6/17 at 7:32 am to RocketBallz
If ESPN ever shits the bed,
how much would you be willing to pay on a monthly basis? I have stupid memberships for 10 bucks a month, so to watch good SECN programming (no Pawl) I'd have no issue with 20 bucks a month.
how much would you be willing to pay on a monthly basis? I have stupid memberships for 10 bucks a month, so to watch good SECN programming (no Pawl) I'd have no issue with 20 bucks a month.
Posted on 5/6/17 at 8:39 am to RocketBallz
Can someone explain why they don't put any god damned baseball games on the alt channels, which are receiving zero viewers currently? They are already producing the broadcast and putting it on the internet. More content = more eyeballs = more money.
Does it cost them more to broadcast the game on an alt channel versus internet?
Does it cost them more to broadcast the game on an alt channel versus internet?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News