Started By
Message
So I thought Bama returned a lot of contributing players next season?
Posted on 2/8/16 at 12:53 pm
Posted on 2/8/16 at 12:53 pm
LINK
This says you're 104th in the nation?
It's not based on starters FYI
This says you're 104th in the nation?
It's not based on starters FYI
This post was edited on 2/8/16 at 12:57 pm
19
Posted on 2/8/16 at 12:53 pm to GermantownTiger
They have lots of guys that rotate in and out. Lots of experience even if they don't start. Same thing state does. Our best players usually don't start
Posted on 2/8/16 at 12:54 pm to GermantownTiger
We just replace them with better players. 
Posted on 2/8/16 at 12:55 pm to GermantownTiger
Returning starters doesn't matter because so many backups saw playing time. Not just garbage time but real playing time.
This post was edited on 2/8/16 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 2/8/16 at 12:56 pm to GermantownTiger
quote:
This says you're 104th in the nation?
We were 100th in 2015 and that went pretty well
Alabama Returning Starters 2015
Posted on 2/8/16 at 12:58 pm to GermantownTiger
In the secondary: Eddie Jackson, Marlon Humphrey, Minkah Fitzpatrick, Ronnie Harrison, and Tony Brown (hopefully).
Up front: Daron Payne, Jonathan Allen, Tim Williams, Rueben Foster, Da'Shawn Hand, Rashaan Evans, and Ryan Anderson.
Up front: Daron Payne, Jonathan Allen, Tim Williams, Rueben Foster, Da'Shawn Hand, Rashaan Evans, and Ryan Anderson.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 12:59 pm to GermantownTiger
We do.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 1:03 pm to GermantownTiger
So some computer geek writing on a blog crated some kind of formula. So?
Posted on 2/8/16 at 1:08 pm to GermantownTiger
We don't care about those rankings, we are STACKED! There is so much talent on campus right now, it makes the Broncos envious.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 1:11 pm to GermantownTiger
quote:
So
Why do people think this is the way to begin a sentence and when did it become a thing?
Posted on 2/8/16 at 1:14 pm to GermantownTiger
quote:
This says you're 104th in the nation?
It's not based on starters FYI
I'd imagine we probably weren't much better off at the beginning of this past season, maybe worse...especially considering we only returned 2 starters on offense (losing 80-90% of our receiving production and 'bout 90% of our passing production) and we didn't rotate near as much on our D-line. We still ended up doin' pretty OK, I think...
I feel reasonably confident we'll finish better than 104th among FBS schools next season...
Posted on 2/8/16 at 1:18 pm to GermantownTiger
quote:We just said that so y'all wouldn't absolutely crawl in a hole and die when we kick y'alls asses AGAIN next year.
This says you're 104th in the nation?
It's not based on starters FYI
Posted on 2/8/16 at 1:20 pm to GermantownTiger
How the SEC falls out on the site:
SEC Rank/ School/ Overall Rank
1) LSU - 1
2) UT - 12
3) UGA - 29
4) Mizzou - 35
5) Vandy - 40
6) aTm - 67
7) Arky - 73
8) USCe - 81
9) Ole Miss - 83
10) Auburn - 85
11) Kentucky - 90
12) Florida - 94
13) Miss St - 101
14) Bama - 104
SEC Rank/ School/ Overall Rank
1) LSU - 1
2) UT - 12
3) UGA - 29
4) Mizzou - 35
5) Vandy - 40
6) aTm - 67
7) Arky - 73
8) USCe - 81
9) Ole Miss - 83
10) Auburn - 85
11) Kentucky - 90
12) Florida - 94
13) Miss St - 101
14) Bama - 104
Posted on 2/8/16 at 1:23 pm to GermantownTiger
quote:
GermantownTiger
You're going to need around the clock support after that 104th ranked team of non-contributors leaves Baton Rouge next November.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 1:29 pm to GermantownTiger
This truly is setting up to be LSU's year. It will be interesting to see how they end up pissing it away.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 1:30 pm to GermantownTiger
Bama only needs one person returning next year
Posted on 2/8/16 at 1:31 pm to GermantownTiger
People check out lots of statistical prediction methods for college football, none of which really work. But any system that last year produced these whoppers is probably worse than useless:
117 - Washington (43% O, 44% D, 44% OVR)
#116 - Alabama (26% O, 64% D, 45% OVR)
#110 - Florida State (38% O, 60% D, 49% OVR)
#103 - Iowa (43% O, 59% D, 51% OVR)
#102 - Clemson (64% O, 40% D, 52% OR)
...well, maybe by standing the stats on end and using the obverse, less-experience=higher-finish, would work.
Why are stats that are clearly of no use in identifying historical team success worth posting here?
And any stat that shows Alabama last in the SEC and 104th in the nation probably should be disregarded right off the bat... at least in my opinion.
117 - Washington (43% O, 44% D, 44% OVR)
#116 - Alabama (26% O, 64% D, 45% OVR)
#110 - Florida State (38% O, 60% D, 49% OVR)
#103 - Iowa (43% O, 59% D, 51% OVR)
#102 - Clemson (64% O, 40% D, 52% OR)
...well, maybe by standing the stats on end and using the obverse, less-experience=higher-finish, would work.
Why are stats that are clearly of no use in identifying historical team success worth posting here?
And any stat that shows Alabama last in the SEC and 104th in the nation probably should be disregarded right off the bat... at least in my opinion.
This post was edited on 2/8/16 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 2/8/16 at 1:31 pm to GermantownTiger
I like that Bama is so dominant that this is the best opposing fans can do during the offseason.
Posted on 2/8/16 at 2:22 pm to GermantownTiger
quote:They do...
So I thought Bama returned a lot of contributing players next season?
Posted on 2/8/16 at 2:27 pm to GermantownTiger
I guess this means we will have a down year and only win 11 games huh?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News