Started By
Message
re: How come Florida and Georgia cant stop Mizzou from winning East?
Posted on 7/4/15 at 11:20 am to Mizzou4ever
Posted on 7/4/15 at 11:20 am to Mizzou4ever
quote:
The fact is though, Richt always finds a way to lose games, critical games, that he shouldn't. The last two years, Mizzou has taken advantage of that and won the East. It's that simple in my book.
Well there ya go.
Posted on 7/4/15 at 12:38 pm to Tackle74
quote:
quote:
I just tend to look at the entire season as the measure of a team. You seem to be judging by which team was better if both teams played there best. Georgia was the better game team and Mizzou the better season long team.
I am comparing them, every single game included. What about you?
To start, What were your top 4 wins last year?
Posted on 7/4/15 at 3:52 pm to djsdawg
I am comparing them, every single game included. What about you?
Then you do not know shite and it is a waste trying to convince you, but here you go. Georgia went 3-2 in division, Mizzou 4-1. Mizzou beat 2 teams that Georgia lost to. Georgia skull fricked Mizzou but their on field performance was not good enough to beat a horrid Florida team or a down USC. Using your logic that makes Georgia worse then Florida and USC last year which we know is bs. Hell I admit at peak UGA was way better. Why can't you admit a "better" team does not lose to Florida and USC?
Then you do not know shite and it is a waste trying to convince you, but here you go. Georgia went 3-2 in division, Mizzou 4-1. Mizzou beat 2 teams that Georgia lost to. Georgia skull fricked Mizzou but their on field performance was not good enough to beat a horrid Florida team or a down USC. Using your logic that makes Georgia worse then Florida and USC last year which we know is bs. Hell I admit at peak UGA was way better. Why can't you admit a "better" team does not lose to Florida and USC?
This post was edited on 7/4/15 at 3:59 pm
Posted on 7/4/15 at 4:43 pm to djsdawg
So the division winner is not actually the best team in the division? So you would prefer to be ranked 3 spots higher and not be division champs? Missouri would likely be ranked higher if they didn't have to play BAMA .
You guys can claim that your better then Missouri because you beat them and they can claim they were the best team in the east because they won the division in which UGA plays.
You guys can claim that your better then Missouri because you beat them and they can claim they were the best team in the east because they won the division in which UGA plays.
This post was edited on 7/4/15 at 4:49 pm
Posted on 7/4/15 at 4:55 pm to tjv305
Depends. Sometimes the division winner isn't the best one. Not sure how that's such a difficult idea to comprehend. Who do you think would have given bama a better game?
Posted on 7/4/15 at 5:38 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Depends. Sometimes the division winner isn't the best one. Not sure how that's such a difficult idea to comprehend. Who do you think would have given bama a better game?
Sure sounds like some moral victory speak. Woof woof woof
Posted on 7/4/15 at 6:17 pm to kilo
Only to a simple minded blind man like you.
Posted on 7/4/15 at 6:25 pm to THWG247
Georgia Tech fan, are you Chrissy?
Just so you know, as a Tech grad you are probably middle management and your company is owned or run by a Vandy grad.
quote:
And yes sir i did graduate from Tech, and now i'm your Boss, get back to digging that ditch bitch, and no you may not have the 4th off!
Just so you know, as a Tech grad you are probably middle management and your company is owned or run by a Vandy grad.
Posted on 7/4/15 at 7:46 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Only to a simple minded blind man like you.
Right...
Posted on 7/4/15 at 8:04 pm to kilo
The most pathetic part of this thread is how proud kolo is of trolling, as if it's some grand accomplishment in his life.
Posted on 7/4/15 at 8:16 pm to djsdawg
quote:
The most pathetic part of this thread is how proud kolo is of trolling, as if it's some grand accomplishment in his life.
You seem like a bitch. woof woof
Posted on 7/4/15 at 8:18 pm to tjv305
quote:
You guys can claim that your better then Missouri because you beat them and they can claim they were the best team in the east because they won the division in which UGA plays.
Dogs are not known for being intelligent. They are loyal but not very smart.
Posted on 7/4/15 at 8:24 pm to kilo
This thread sums up the Georgia tards on this board perfectly. A bunch of bragging over individual victories and a bunch of excuses for why they haven't won more championships in recent years
Posted on 7/4/15 at 8:27 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
This thread sums up the Georgia tards on this board perfectly. A bunch of bragging over individual victories and a bunch of excuses for why they haven't won more championships in recent years
Whats even more ironic is that they make fun of Mizzou for being proud of winning the East while being proud of beating Mizzou for some moral victory in the middle of the season.
Posted on 7/4/15 at 8:50 pm to kilo
Phan and kilo, a dynamic duo of cluelessness. One doesn't know what a moral victory is yet just Brought it up incorrectly a second time. The other can't differentiate between bragging and pointing out irrefutable facts.
Posted on 7/4/15 at 9:03 pm to kilo
But you never start troll threads. Riiiiight.
Posted on 7/4/15 at 9:08 pm to kilo
Didn't Georgia beat ya'll like 500-0 at home last year?
Posted on 7/4/15 at 9:45 pm to AmazinGrace
quote:
Didn't Georgia beat ya'll like 500-0 at home last year?
October 11th, Georgia beats Mizzou 34-0.
October 18th, Mizzou beats Florida 42-13.
November 1st, Florida beats Georgia 38-20 (while attempting just six passes and rushing for 418 yards)
What we can clearly see from this that Georgia > Mizzou > Florida > Georgia > Mizzou > Florida ad infinitum. It should have been a three way tie in the East or possibly all three teams should have played each other at the same time. Using conference record to decide who's better is bullshite.
Posted on 7/4/15 at 9:55 pm to Othello
quote:
But you never start troll threads. Riiiiight.
Well, just because a legitimate question invokes such emotional responses doesn't mean its a "troll thread"
We hear about the "Big 6" and their history and such on a daily basis. Seems like a fairly straightforward question how 3 "Big 6" programs that out recruit Mizzou by a mile every year can let Mizzou win the East in 2 out of its first 3 years.
Sorry you think thats a "troll". I think its a pretty honest question.
This post was edited on 7/4/15 at 9:56 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News