Sarcastro
| Favorite team: | Missouri  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 1785 |
| Registered on: | 5/4/2012 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Make sure you watch 60 Minutes tonight
Posted by Sarcastro on 12/15/25 at 4:43 pm to theballguy
he looks like a total nerd
1
re: Least qualified CFP team in history
Posted by Sarcastro on 12/7/25 at 3:16 pm to theballguy
if a twelve team playoff, making it to the sec championship should always mean you make the cfp
re: Notre Dame guaranteed CFP spot starting next year with stipulations
Posted by Sarcastro on 12/7/25 at 3:04 pm to GreatPumpkin
quote:
I think Alabama has a better resume. They’ve got better top end wins in Georgia and Vandy. They’ve also got very good wins against Tennessee, Mizzou and LSU. Those last 3 alone are all roughly as good as Notre Dame’s singular good win against USC
yah but have you seen rudy?
re: Notre Dame guaranteed CFP spot starting next year with stipulations
Posted by Sarcastro on 12/7/25 at 2:50 pm to deltadummy
here would be an actual good new rule for the cfp: if your team opts out of playing in a bowl game they aren't eligible for the cfp the next season
re: Notre Dame guaranteed CFP spot starting next year with stipulations
Posted by Sarcastro on 12/7/25 at 2:37 pm to ColoradoAg
why can't my team be guaranteed a playoff spot if they finish top 12? why can't all sec teams be guaranteed a spot if they finish top 12? why is notre dame special?
re: Notre Dame guaranteed CFP spot starting next year with stipulations
Posted by Sarcastro on 12/7/25 at 2:34 pm to GreatPumpkin
why is everyone in the cfb world fine with one team getting special treatment? I don't get it. how does this benefit our conference or any of the teams in our conference?
i'd really prefer not to play wake forest. we played them in a bowl game not that long ago, and that was plenty
quote:
Good for us but tough for the Mizzou fans. It seems clear their program realizes Drink is the best coach they’ll be able to get, and they’re content with seven to nine win seasons.
this will be our first seven to nine win season in drink’s six seasons as our coach
re: Ross Dellinger: "Eli Drinkwitz Is LSU's Second Choice Behind Lane"??
Posted by Sarcastro on 11/26/25 at 3:53 pm to BigOrangeKen
i heard blake baker was the backup plan if the kiffin deal fell through
what's the point of this thread? the post highlighted isn't even trash talk. i don't understand why any oklahoma fan would be upset by it
re: SEC QBs organized by passer rating
Posted by Sarcastro on 11/18/25 at 3:59 pm to Hugh McElroy
john mateer wishes he was as good as beau pribula
my big 12 sources are saying texas came to the sec because they are ran by a bunch of dickheads and oklahoma followed them because they are texas's little brother
we lost the game when kirby decided to get cute with his play calling at the two yard line
quote:
The story is Mizzou's defense. That's it.
People score on Aggie. People score often on Aggie. This is not an issue. Starting QB, backup QB, or run from the pistol every play. You will score on Aggie.
Here's the catch - Aggie knows how to score. And thus far in 2025, they do it more often than their opponent.
This game is all about Mizzou defense. I've only seen one Mizzou game and their defense looked physical, but I have no idea how consistently good (or bad) they are.
Keep Aggie under 30 points, and Mizzou wins.
defense is great. probably top four in the sec with auburn, oklahoma, and texas. great front seven and ok secondary. main weakness is the safeties who are very aggressive against the run, but not very fast. carnell is as big as a linebacker and catalon is as slow as one.
we've done a great job not giving up chunk plays, but when we have given them up, we've given up our share of very big plays. for example, we are #7 in the nation 10+ yard runs given up, but we are the only team to have given up two runs of 80+ yards. we have given up like 760 rush yards total and 160+ of those on two runs
however, if we can't protect zollers and can't get the offense going, i still see the defense getting worn down in the second half and a&m scoring 30+ points
yah, if our line can't protect zollers i don't see any way our offense ever gets going. that is the biggest mismatch to me. im hoping for one of those really cool things where we somehow get some big plays real fast and go up by multiple scores early making it easier to rely on our ground game and defense
re: Why mizzou
Posted by Sarcastro on 11/5/25 at 6:53 pm to Wishbone85
quote:
Ha you don't have Jackson Arnold to save you this year.
well yah, actually we did
quote:
Cry me a river ….. Mizery deal with it have more depth isn’t that what you told OU fans last year ne mot of this year on OL?
buddy, our third string qb is making his first start, and it isn't like we are playing oklahoma this saturday
re: Why mizzou
Posted by Sarcastro on 11/5/25 at 5:21 pm to Trumansfangs
little brother threads are becoming an epidemic on the rant
quote:
True, we however played in four other title(national championships) afterwards. But you will NEVER sniff a title game. I still can’t fathom why mizzou plays varsity sports
you don't know why the flagship university of one of our nation's states plays varsity sports? that makes you sound pretty dumb
zollers is going to need to be some sort of qb savant with our oline against that pass rush in his first start. not looking good for the the sec's #1 tigers
so weird when lsu people start little brother threads about mizzou
Popular
27
