Started By
Message
locked post

Did Pat Sullivan Get Screwed Out of the 1970 Heisman Trophy?

Posted on 3/10/14 at 5:14 pm
Posted by LSUFOREVERAMEN
Illinois
Member since Dec 2013
1300 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 5:14 pm
His stats were better than either Jim Plunkett or Archie Manning (Yes, Sullivan out-rushed Manning in 1970). So, why did he place 6th in the Heisman Voting that year.

Sullivan should have been the first back-to-back Heisman Trophy winner (1970 and 1971).
Posted by LSUFOREVERAMEN
Illinois
Member since Dec 2013
1300 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 5:19 pm to
Sullivan even won the Gator Bowl MVP against Archie Manning.
Posted by diddydirtyAubie
Bozeman
Member since Dec 2010
39829 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

Sullivan even won the Gator Bowl MVP against Archie Manning.


Team sport.
Posted by UncleRuckus
Member since Feb 2013
9982 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 5:32 pm to
I AM OUTRAGED
Posted by Gus Bus Driver
Member since Feb 2014
495 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 5:37 pm to
Rumor is he will retroactively claim it next season
Posted by BamaDude06
GOATville20
Member since Jan 2007
3739 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 6:03 pm to
He shouldn't have won it in 1971.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 6:45 pm to
He was a Junior, they rarely gave it to an underclassman.
Posted by joeyb147
Member since Jun 2009
16019 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

He shouldn't have won it in 1971.
quote:

Alabama Fan
Like clockwork.
Posted by BamaDude06
GOATville20
Member since Jan 2007
3739 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 8:01 pm to
How many Heisman winning QBs win after losing their final game in a top 5 showdown by going 14/27 for 121 yards 0 Tds 2 INTs and their team loses 31-7? If voting took place like it did today he would not have won.
Posted by TydeLyfe
Birmingham
Member since Mar 2014
111 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 8:03 pm to
Why coz he's got an opinion? I never thought he looked like a hiseman either. Just your average quarterback
Posted by diddydirtyAubie
Bozeman
Member since Dec 2010
39829 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

If voting took place like it did back then Ingram would not have won.



FIFY
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
44298 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 8:06 pm to
quote:

If voting took place like it did today he would not have won.



Kinda like being voted national champs before losing in your bowl game? fricking Bama fans.....
Posted by BamaDude06
GOATville20
Member since Jan 2007
3739 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 8:09 pm to
Yes Ingram would have won. He was the Heisman front runner going into the Iron Bowl (which is when the 1971 voting happened).
Posted by BamaDude06
GOATville20
Member since Jan 2007
3739 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

Kinda like being voted national champs before losing in your bowl game? fricking Bama fans.....


Or like calling all the Alabama radio stations and telling them not to vote in the AP poll until after the Iron Bowl so Auburn would win the AP title even though they were on a post season ban.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

How many Heisman winning QBs win after losing their final game in a top 5 showdown by going 14/27 for 121 yards 0 Tds 2 INTs and their team loses 31-7? If voting took place like it did today he would not have won.


About as ofter as a Heisman winning RB wins it after having 5 games under 100 yards rushing and 30 yards against its biggest rival.
Posted by BamaDude06
GOATville20
Member since Jan 2007
3739 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

5 games under 100 yards rushing

Three of those were blow out wins where he didn't need to put up big numbers.
The fourth he had 99 yards
Too bad his last 9 games before the heisman he didn't have
140 yards, 172 yards, 246 yards, 99 yards, 144 yards, 149 yards, 102 yards, 30 yards, and 113 yards. Oh wait...


quote:

30 yards against its biggest rival.


And yet his team still won, while Pat's lost 31-7.
Posted by northalabamacracker
Glasgow
Member since Sep 2011
6466 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 8:18 pm to
Was the Heisman awarded after the bowl hames back then. If not stupid fricking comparison dip shite.
Posted by OldPete
Georgia
Member since Oct 2013
2898 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

He was a Junior, they rarely gave it to an underclassman.


This...

Sullivan had better stats in '70 but finished 6th, when a good argument can be made that he deserved to win...yet he wins his Senior year in '71 with less impressive stats than the year before...Greg Pruitt was a Junior in '71, rushed for 1700 yards, averaged something like 9 yards a carry, and finished 3rd...the next year as a Senior, Pruitt had 'bout half the yards and finished 2nd...

The Heisman seems to have been slanted more towards Seniors and overall careers back in the day...
This post was edited on 3/10/14 at 8:27 pm
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
108755 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 8:20 pm to
My guess is you missed what he was trying to point out...

Posted by Smoke7024
Member since Jun 2010
24049 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 8:20 pm to
Who could've guessed that Bama fans would be all in this thread talking about how Sullivan didn't deserve the Heisman?
This post was edited on 3/10/14 at 8:21 pm
Page 1 2 3 4
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter