Started By
Message
re: Since '80, what dynasty comes in 2nd place behind the current Alabama dynasty?
Posted on 12/15/13 at 5:53 pm to HailToTheChiz
Posted on 12/15/13 at 5:53 pm to HailToTheChiz
We've beaten the #1 team in the country in the championship game by a combined score of 65-35 
And Alabama has had 2 SEC titles, not 1. Florida had a time when they won4 straight titles in the SEC did they not? Out of that came 1 championship and before that, the worst embarrassment in the history of the SEC. What you said is almost meaningless. Auburn has been slightly above average from 2004-2013 except for 2 teams and others have been absolutely god awful.
Alabama has played some ridiculously talented teams in the SEC and were lucky to have gone undefeated in 2009 which I believe was our best team. Something USC can't even come close to laying claim to. Nebraska was better to me but your entire statement carried no weight to it.
And Alabama has had 2 SEC titles, not 1. Florida had a time when they won4 straight titles in the SEC did they not? Out of that came 1 championship and before that, the worst embarrassment in the history of the SEC. What you said is almost meaningless. Auburn has been slightly above average from 2004-2013 except for 2 teams and others have been absolutely god awful.
Alabama has played some ridiculously talented teams in the SEC and were lucky to have gone undefeated in 2009 which I believe was our best team. Something USC can't even come close to laying claim to. Nebraska was better to me but your entire statement carried no weight to it.
2
Posted on 12/15/13 at 5:53 pm to Tammany Tom
Nebraska first.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 5:54 pm to Dr Lecter
Mid 90's Nebraska would shite all over the Saban teams.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:00 pm to FourThreeForty
So what you are telling me is that bama isn't the dynasty you hoped?
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:04 pm to stevo1905
quote:
Auburn 04-13
Absolutely not.
1. 2004 is the only dominant Auburn team in that stretch.
2. There are several average and bad Auburn teams mixed in there too.
3. 2 national championships in a decade does not make a program a dynasty.
4. Auburn has a losing record versus rivals Georgia and LSU in that time span. Auburn has a losing record versus Alabama since Alabama's dynasty began.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:07 pm to craigbiggio
quote:
LSU 2003-2007
Where do I begin? 2007 LSU did not have the markings of a great team and took advantage of a ridiculous season where upsets were occurring left and right.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:11 pm to DevilDogTiger
quote:
What about Miami for most of the nineties to 01. 01 Miami is still better than any Bama team ever and is probably only second to 95 Nebraska.
The SEC is as strong as it's ever been. Alabama meets at least one Top 5 opponent every regular season. They've had to battle a formidable LSU program along with other great SEC teams to reach the national championship game. No one team runs the SEC. Aside from Miami, Florida State, and Nebraska what other programs were great in their respective conferences during their runs? How many Top 5 teams did they face in the regular season? How many teams had comparable talent in their conferences?
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:13 pm to Gardevoir
quote:
Where do I begin? 2007 LSU did not have the markings of a great team and took advantage of a ridiculous season where upsets were occurring left and right.
You mean like your last two NC's?
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:16 pm to Dr Lecter
You guys are missing Miami in the early 2000's. Would destroy anybody out there today.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:22 pm to Dr Lecter
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:23 pm to HailToTheChiz
I believe 10 or more wins each year and 3 National Titles since 08 constitutes a dynasty. I don't know where it ranks but it is a dynasty IMO.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:24 pm to Dr Lecter
What dynasty has bama had? 2 sec titles in 13 years isn't a dynasty. I hope you aren't counting those bcs titles. They are exhibition games that aren't recognized by the NCAA.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:24 pm to Dr Lecter
Current alabama dynasty officially died. Auburn ended that shite.
Bama will remain good, but stop with the dynasty nonsense.
Bama will remain good, but stop with the dynasty nonsense.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:25 pm to stevo1905
Auburn won 3 games in 2012
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:26 pm to Gardevoir
quote:
2012 Alabama did not have the markings of a great team and took advantage of a ridiculous season where upsets were occurring left and right.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:28 pm to Gardevoir
quote:
The SEC is as strong as it's ever been. Alabama meets at least one Top 5 opponent every regular season. T
And. loses. Bama has lost to its highest rated opponent 4 years in a row.
This post was edited on 12/15/13 at 6:30 pm
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:28 pm to Gardevoir
Yeah it was a joke 
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:29 pm to memphisplaya
It takes skill and luck to get in the NC game! I'd say 3 total losses in 3 years is outstanding in this conf!
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:30 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
Mid '90s Nebraska is easily #1. 2009-2012 Bama had more than twice as many losses as 1994-1997 Nebraska. I hate to say it but Nebraska was on another level.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:30 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:You are the epitome of a rantard.
I hope you aren't counting those bcs titles. They are exhibition games that aren't recognized by the NCAA.
Page 2 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News