Started By
Message
Invites to be on Playoff Committee are underway
Posted on 9/25/13 at 8:22 pm
Posted on 9/25/13 at 8:22 pm
quote:
"We are making calls to prospective members to gauge their interest," Hancock said during the conference commissioners' meeting at Big Ten headquarters. "And those are going very well. We have invited some people to participate. The response has been remarkable. A hundred percent has been excited to get the call, honored to get the call and wants to give something back to the game."
Several prospective candidates have declined because of conflicts, and not a lack of desire to serve. The committee members will be either sitting major conference athletic directors or former players, coaches, administrators or media members.
quote:
"There will be no computer standings involved. The committee will make the decision, just like NCAA basketball."
Everybody asked for it, now they're getting it
Posted on 9/25/13 at 8:23 pm to Alahunter
there will be no bias at all in this system
Posted on 9/25/13 at 8:24 pm to Alahunter
quote:
There will be no computer standings involved. The committee will make the decision, just like NCAA basketball
Basketball uses the RPI, which is spit out by a computer.
I nominate Gene Stallings though.
Posted on 9/25/13 at 8:25 pm to Alahunter
quote:
We are making calls
I hope Phil Fulmer has forgotten to pay his phone bill.
Posted on 9/25/13 at 8:25 pm to gnarkill1529
No kidding. It's bad when the people being asked are declining because of a conflict of interest. Are they that stupid not to vet out potential conflicting issues before inviting them?
Posted on 9/25/13 at 8:26 pm to East Coast Band
Wait and see, he and Kramer will be on it.
Posted on 9/25/13 at 8:26 pm to bigpapamac
quote:
Basketball uses the RPI, which is spit out by a computer.
The RPI is just something the committee references. Humans pick the teams.
I like the computers because the formula is set. There is no human bias.
Posted on 9/25/13 at 8:27 pm to Alahunter
in theory this system works great...but in actuality I think its going to piss a lot of people off
Posted on 9/25/13 at 8:30 pm to Sig
we will see ohio state every year
Posted on 9/25/13 at 8:30 pm to Alahunter
quote:
The committee members will be either sitting major conference athletic directors or former players, coaches, administrators or media members.
Posted on 9/25/13 at 8:32 pm to Alahunter
Waiting patiently by my mailbox.
Or is it by email?? shite
Or is it by email?? shite
Posted on 9/25/13 at 8:33 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Are they that stupid not to vet out potential conflicting issues before inviting them?
Non-Competence Always Allowed
Posted on 9/25/13 at 8:34 pm to Stonewall Tiger
quote:
16
jmo but eventually the system will turn into a top 16 style playoff because ppl will be raising hell that there team didn't make top 4 or 8...even now college basketball teams raise hell cause they didnt make the top 64. granted, i think that is way to many teams for a football playoff but i expect to see 16 teams at some point
Posted on 9/25/13 at 8:36 pm to gnarkill1529
quote:
in actuality I think its going to piss a lot of people off
Posted on 9/25/13 at 8:36 pm to Stonewall Tiger
quote:
System should have stayed the same and just taken the top 4
Totally agree. There's nothing wrong with the BCS rankings IMO.
Still don't understand why they just didn't make it simple and keep the current BCS standings and just take the top4.
Posted on 9/25/13 at 8:37 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
Still don't understand why they just didn't make it simple and keep the current BCS standings and just take the top4
this is actually what i was hoping was going to happen.
Posted on 9/25/13 at 8:39 pm to John Maplethorpe
Computers, no human bias. Gullible there buddy.
Posted on 9/25/13 at 8:39 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Everybody asked for it, now they're getting it
I NEVER asked for it. I'd assume we just go back to the old days, but you can thank ESPN for projecting this ideology that the BCS was broken.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News