Started By
Message

re: Moving Bama and Auburn to the East: isn't that the easiest way?

Posted on 6/9/13 at 1:52 pm to
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
63894 posts
Posted on 6/9/13 at 1:52 pm to
Looks fine to me. We basically have this imbalance now with the way the Easy has been.
Posted by tbonebrah
Member since Jul 2009
2290 posts
Posted on 6/9/13 at 1:52 pm to
Posted by ImperialPalace
Galveston, Texas
Member since Oct 2012
2888 posts
Posted on 6/9/13 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

East:

Bama
Auburn
Tennessee
Florida
Vandy
South Carolina
Georgia

West:

LSU
Miss state
Kentucky
A&M
Missouri
Arkansas
Ole miss
Looks competitively balanced to me...

The SEC needs to place Mizzou in the West where they belong, alongside its Big 12 brother A&M and future rival Arkansas.
quote:

On second thought, this is a great idea. Just swap Vandy and LSU. I'm sure the OP would agree.
Once again, this is a solid suggestion that has the best interests of the conference at heart.
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37280 posts
Posted on 6/9/13 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

Show me where this is a bad idea?


Other than the SEC West being a cakewalk? In that scenario the East might as well break off and start their own conference.
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
54285 posts
Posted on 6/9/13 at 5:49 pm to
Makes perfect sense, yet you'll see fans of the schools moving crying saying the west is too easy.
Posted by bamagreycoat
Member since Oct 2012
5749 posts
Posted on 6/9/13 at 6:33 pm to
Move Auburn to The East and let Mizzou be in The West. That makes geographical sense and let's get rid of permanent cross divisional games. Rotate out all cross divisional games.
Posted by ChEgrad
Member since Nov 2012
3291 posts
Posted on 6/9/13 at 8:06 pm to
The easiest and best solution is to allow Bama/Tenn and Aub/Georgia games to be counted as out of conference games in the years they aren't on the official SEC schedule. Then play a true rotating schedule that is fair to everyone. No permanent rivals.

Even LSU/Florida could go that route.
Posted by PJinAtl
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
12775 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 8:08 am to
Actually yhe easiest thing to do would be to move Arkansas and LSU to the Big XII, then move Mizzou to the west where they belong.

This would accomplish several things:
1) aTm and Mizzou would play every year so there would be some carry over there from their Big XII days.
2) Auburn/UGA, Bama/Tenn and Auburn/Bama all continue annually without issue.
3) SEC returns to a more manageable 12 teams and a 5-2-1 schedule.
4) LSU and Ark are now in a conference that fits them more geographically and don't have to worry about SEC bias.
Posted by NorthGwinnettTiger
Member since Jun 2006
51876 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 12:00 pm to
I'd be fine with going to the East, regardless of how easy the West becomes. No need to bitch, moan and cry because you have too hard of a schedule. I'd love to have Florida, UGA, Tennessee and Bama on an annual basis.
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 12:04 pm to
If you want change, just reset the divisions.

DIV A
Bama
Vandy
AU
MIZZ
UGA
OM
MSU

Div B
UF
USC
UT
LSU
A&M
UK
Arky
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18229 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 12:06 pm to
I'd move Florida and Missouri or Vanderbilt to the West instead of Kentucky.

Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20841 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 12:15 pm to
Keep Kentucky, give up Vandy, and the east can go ahead and start their own conference.
Posted by BRLawyer
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Member since Sep 2004
354 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 12:57 pm to
Perfectly logical.
Posted by JYD
Pineville
Member since Oct 2003
7754 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

Moving Bama and Auburn to the East: isn't that the easiest way?


Yes. Bottom line, if Bama/Tenn and Aub/UGA have to play each other every stupid year this is the best solution. It also makes sense geographically. Either break up the permanent cross-divisional matchups or re-align the divisions. Play and simple. Sure the East will be stronger than the West, but it was like that for years before Bama's return to glory and LSU's rise to prominence since 00. Make it happen!
This post was edited on 6/10/13 at 2:35 pm
Posted by Wild Thang
YAW YAW Fooball Nation
Member since Jun 2009
44181 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 12:19 am to
quote:

Move Bama and Auburn to the East so they can play Georgia and Tennessee every year.


Make no mistake, this would be the ideal solution.

But Bama so scared to play in the East.
Posted by rangers911
Member since Jun 2009
5159 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 12:51 am to
Auburn going to the east makes sense, bama not as much. UF is not pleased with the idea of playing auburn every year you are nuts if you think they will sign off on bama moving as well.
Posted by RocketBallz
Member since Oct 2012
1285 posts
Posted on 6/11/13 at 1:03 am to
This is better, more balanced.

South East: Bama, Tennessee, Florida, LSU, South Carolina, Georgia

North West: Vandy, Miss State, Kentucky, Missouri, Arkansas, Ole Miss

B12: Auburn, A&M


first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter