Started By
Message
Here is the list for how much each team spent for basketball this year. Interesting
Posted on 3/16/26 at 9:33 am
Posted on 3/16/26 at 9:33 am
2. Tenn
4. Texas
6. Arkansas
8. Kentucky
9. Auburn
13. Ole Miss
4. Texas
6. Arkansas
8. Kentucky
9. Auburn
13. Ole Miss
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 3/16/26 at 9:36 am
Posted on 3/16/26 at 9:40 am to tigerskin
quote:
2. Tenn
The fact that Tenn is all in on men's basketball but has never made a Final Four is pretty wild.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 9:40 am to tigerskin
quote:
basketball this year
It clearly states that this was for last year, not this year.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 9:41 am to borotiger
Probably similar number
This post was edited on 3/16/26 at 11:10 am
Posted on 3/16/26 at 9:48 am to tigerskin
Oats is getting his money worth. Auburn is not. UK is not.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 9:48 am to tigerskin
I dont think you understand what your link says.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 9:51 am to SEC Doctor
quote:
The fact that Tenn is all in on men's basketball but has never made a Final Four is pretty wild.
Why is this wild? Wouldn't you expect them to spend tons of money to improve?
Posted on 3/16/26 at 9:51 am to Contra
I don't believe this OU source, seems to be trying to downplay what the Sooners spent.
Oklahoma landed a top 10-12 transfer portal class last offseason, there is no way they spent that little to get it.
Oklahoma landed a top 10-12 transfer portal class last offseason, there is no way they spent that little to get it.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 9:59 am to tigerskin
we need to funnel every penny of that to Baseball. A sport that matters 
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:03 am to tigerskin
Operational budget probably doesn’t include NIL
This post was edited on 3/16/26 at 10:04 am
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:07 am to Contra
quote:\
Oats is getting his money worth. Auburn is not. UK is not.
Operational budget isn't NIL.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:07 am to tigerskin
Trying to compare operational expenses is nearly impossible since every school categorizes differently. It's a fun thing to look at, but probably not very accurate.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:09 am to tigerskin
We spent $20M for that???
I don't believe NIL #s very much. They seem to always be inflated for everybody.
I don't believe NIL #s very much. They seem to always be inflated for everybody.
This post was edited on 3/16/26 at 10:10 am
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:09 am to Contra
quote:
Oats is getting his money worth. UK is not.
quote:
Kentucky $22 MIL (7 SEED)
Georgia $8-10 MIL (8 SEED)
Alabama $8-10 MIL (4 SEED)
Interesting that Kentucky lost to Alabama and Georgia in the regular season with a roster that cost more than both put together.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:15 am to paperwasp
Indiana has some deep pockets if they are spending that much on hoops and also just won a football natty
Who saw that coming?
Who saw that coming?
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:20 am to nicholastiger
quote:
Indiana has some deep pockets if they are spending that much on hoops and also just won a football natty
Yeah, and I think their basketball team just turned down an NIT invite.
Much like Texas football, they don't seem to understand just yet that they haven't been relevant for the greater part of 20 years.

Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:27 am to tigerskin
Without reading the thread yet, sure it bears repeating that operating budget does NOT include NIL.
Simply what the athletic department publishes as operating expenses for the programs... staff, facilities, travel etc
NIL would be a lot more interesting.
Simply what the athletic department publishes as operating expenses for the programs... staff, facilities, travel etc
NIL would be a lot more interesting.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:30 am to nicholastiger
Isn't Cuban basically funding all the Indiana sports?
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:32 am to ColoradoAg
quote:
Isn't Cuban basically funding all the Indiana sports?
Are you saying Fernando Mendoza has ties to Raúl and possibly Fidel Castro?
Popular
Back to top

9






