Started By
Message
Real talk: Lane doesn't win that game last night
Posted on 1/2/26 at 10:42 am
Posted on 1/2/26 at 10:42 am
He would have been overly aggressive and played right into Kirbys hands. Pete being slightly more focused on D was the difference.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 10:43 am to AUCE05
Lane would gone for it on every 4th down that was under 5 yards and lost the game.. He would not have try them long FG's at all
Posted on 1/2/26 at 10:44 am to AUCE05
Lane sh*ts his pants in that game last night. That's what he does in big games. He's literally won nothing of significance.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 10:44 am to AUCE05
Which conservative decisions did Pete make that Lane wouldn't have, specifically?
Posted on 1/2/26 at 10:46 am to NaturalBeam
quote:
Which conservative decisions did Pete make that Lane wouldn't have, specifically?
Kicking field goals.
Kiffin blew a 9 point lead in the 4th quarter against Georgia.
Last night Ole Miss came back from being down 9 points and got screwed by the refs multiple times in the process.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 10:48 am to NaturalBeam
I think he would’ve kicked one of those field goals at the beginning, not both. But who knows, maybe you convert the fourth and score a TD.
The real question is how the playcalling would’ve differed and how that would’ve affected the defense’s rest on the sideline.
Overall, it’s a silly comparison.
The real question is how the playcalling would’ve differed and how that would’ve affected the defense’s rest on the sideline.
Overall, it’s a silly comparison.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 10:51 am to 3down10
2 field goals on 4&9 and 4&5 in the first quarter? I'm pretty sure Lane would kick those as well.
Anything else?
Anything else?
Posted on 1/2/26 at 10:52 am to NaturalBeam
This is such a stupid thread. Literally nobody knows. Does he kick the FGs? Probably. He probably would not have fricked up the end of half situation as much. This is all hypothetical bullshite.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 10:53 am to NaturalBeam
You are in for a shock.
Dan Campbell wears kiffin pajamas.
Dan Campbell wears kiffin pajamas.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 10:53 am to TMRebel
quote:I'm not sure it would've been much different with CWJ still calling the plays.
The real question is how the playcalling would’ve differed and how that would’ve affected the defense’s rest on the sideline.
Overall, it’s a silly comparison.
But I agree it's silly. Both Lane and Pete are good coaches. There's a lot of coaches who could've won that game with Chambliss's performance last night.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 10:57 am to AUCE05
LANESUCKSHARDDDD
ARGHHHHH HE IS A HOE
ARGHHHHH HE IS A HOE
Posted on 1/2/26 at 10:57 am to lefty08
You’re just being a child. Asking hypotheticals as if there is someone who can answer them conclusively.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 10:57 am to AUCE05
quote:
He would have been overly aggressive and played right into Kirbys hands. Pete being slightly more focused on D was the difference.
He would have blown a couple of 4th down calls instead of kicking long field goals and lost by 6.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 10:58 am to AUCE05
quote:
He would have been overly aggressive and played right into Kirbys hands. Pete being slightly more focused on D was the difference.
This is truth. Lane isn't very good against good teams.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 10:59 am to Fireman17
quote:
Lane would gone for it on every 4th down that was under 5 yards and lost the game.. He would not have try them long FG's at all
You are 100% correct. Besides money, I have no idea why any kicker would want to play for a Lane Kiffin coached team.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 10:59 am to AUCE05
quote:
Real talk: Lane doesn't win that game last night

Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:01 am to AlterEd
quote:
This is truth. Lane isn't very good against good teams.
Yeah, Lane was good against mediocre competition like LSU. Now, he doesn't have them to play, so he may have another loss notched on his future seasons...
Posted on 1/2/26 at 11:07 am to AUCE05
September can’t get here fast enough
Back to top


9







