Started By
Message
Interesting take by Sark on 105 scholarships and NIL
Posted on 12/30/25 at 5:17 pm
Posted on 12/30/25 at 5:17 pm
“I’ve got 85 scholarship players, and the money gets spread around. I don’t get more money, just a watered-down version.” He’s right. What good does it do to bring in 20 more players if you can’t afford to pay them? … When I asked Sark if he planned to bring in another running back, he went on a rant about the credibility of some agents and said, “It’s all so strategic. It’s about need and money and the cost and where’s the market and which agent are you dealing with. Some agents are rational, and some I don’t even know if they are licensed. We have no certification in college like the NFL. An agent may be a college roommate who is throwing out numbers we can’t even deal with. It’s unfortunate. So many factors come into play. What are our needs, and what are our luxuries.”
Posted on 12/30/25 at 5:24 pm to HTX Horn
I thought Texas was rich?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 5:25 pm to HTX Horn
Sounds like sark is several cocktails deep.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 5:26 pm to HTX Horn
quote:
I don’t get more money, just a watered-down version.” He’s right. What good does it do to bring in 20 more players if you can’t afford to pay them?
Sounds smart until there are only four RBs on the roster, 1 gets hurt, and the second one's helmet comes off in the game.
Then some freshman comes in and fumbles.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 5:29 pm to HTX Horn
quote:
An agent may be a college roommate who is throwing out numbers we can’t even deal with. It’s unfortunate
NIL is a clown show.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 5:45 pm to HTX Horn
Sark is right, it’s the biggest shitshow free for all I have ever seen. Even with a full time GM, you can’t possibly hope to deal with any of this. It doesn’t work.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 5:48 pm to HTX Horn
quote:
What good does it do to bring in 20 more players if you can’t afford to pay them?
Chances are you aren't bringing in 20 more five stars. You're bringing in fringe scholarship players and giving them a free ride and a chance to develop. I think it'll give teams more flexibility to take JuCo and low (or no) star guys.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 6:39 pm to BAP Enthusiast
Well his lambo shows sure have not helped the situation. Sark helps create the fire and then complains as it consumes him.
This post was edited on 12/30/25 at 6:39 pm
Posted on 12/30/25 at 6:57 pm to HTX Horn
I would really push those last 20 spots towards some project players that are 2-3 stars that fit your system but maybe not metrics or measurable to see if they develop.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:35 pm to BAP Enthusiast
How about with an AI GM?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:56 pm to Warfarer
quote:
would really push those last 20 spots towards some project players that are 2-3 stars that fit your system but maybe not metrics or measurable to see if they develop.
Texas took quite a few 3 stars late in the process. I’m hoping this was the thinking behind that. It’s expensive to pay 4 and 5 stars to not play while they develop, especially if they ultimately transfer and you get zero production out of them. The 3 stars are affordable projects.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:09 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
thought Texas was rich?
I get that there's a cap on the revenue sharing pool. That said it's troubling if Texas boosters keep their powder dry with NIL. We will know for sure when the transfers start. Texas needs to get an impact rb and at least 3-4 ol.
This post was edited on 12/30/25 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:22 pm to HTX Horn
TLDNR. Quit whining loser
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:27 pm to Zgeo
quote:
Quit whining loser
23-6 and another choke job in the CFP.
It’s 8:26 PM and OU still sucks!
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:29 pm to Dirty 6th
quote:
Texas took quite a few 3 stars late in the process.
I noticed this as well and was kinda asking why, but it makes sense to balance the roster.
Popular
Back to top
9








