Started By
Message
Sagarin SOS and wins vs Top 10 and Top 30
Posted on 12/9/25 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 12/9/25 at 12:37 pm
12
Posted on 12/9/25 at 12:39 pm to Night Vision
DEI team Tulane has the 75th hardest schedule 
Posted on 12/9/25 at 12:41 pm to HubbaBubba
Tulane
Tulane A = 74.18 11 2 65.48( 72) 0 1 | 0 1 |
72nd SOS, 0-1 vs Top 10/Top 30.
Tulane A = 74.18 11 2 65.48( 72) 0 1 | 0 1 |
72nd SOS, 0-1 vs Top 10/Top 30.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 12:43 pm to Night Vision
Alabama and Oklahoma representing. Both 1-1 vs top10 and 7-2 vs Top30.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 12:44 pm to Night Vision
The Committee is a joke.
Even Texas A&M who was dogged as playing the weaker teams in the SEC still has a 16th rank.
This just means that the Committee is not valuing the SEC top to bottom as it should. This should be concerning to everyone on this board.
Even Texas A&M who was dogged as playing the weaker teams in the SEC still has a 16th rank.
This just means that the Committee is not valuing the SEC top to bottom as it should. This should be concerning to everyone on this board.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 12:44 pm to HubbaBubba
Notre Dame #3.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 12:45 pm to Night Vision
Cherry picking stats are for losers
Posted on 12/9/25 at 12:45 pm to Night Vision
Ranking of losses should somehow be incorporated in those rankings. Why does everyone count wins against top teams but not loses against bad teams?
Posted on 12/9/25 at 12:45 pm to Chris_topher
quote:
Cherry picking stats are for losers
We're in the playoffs and you aren't.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 12:47 pm to bigblake
quote:
Notre Dame #3.
Weak SOS, 0-2 vs Top 10, 2-2 vs Top 30
Posted on 12/9/25 at 12:47 pm to Tex117
quote:
This just means that the Committee is not valuing the SEC top to bottom as it should. This should be concerning to everyone on this board.
Nobody on this board is concerned about the 9 game conference schedule either.
So next season when these six new coaches lay an egg, there will be plenty of crying and melting then. But now, not a concern in the world.
This post was edited on 12/9/25 at 12:48 pm
Posted on 12/9/25 at 12:48 pm to Night Vision
I just read the rankings, not a few components of it. Looks like there is more stuff on the right about offense and defense.
OU looking like they don’t belong.
OU looking like they don’t belong.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 12:50 pm to Chip82
#trustsankey
Posted on 12/9/25 at 12:56 pm to Chip82
Morons. The lot of them. Kirby had it right. With another game, you are going to have that many more loses.
The Committee is forcing this to be two separate games to navigate. (1) how can a team win as many football games as possible by lining up as many cupcakes, and (2) actually how good your football team is.
The Committee is forcing this to be two separate games to navigate. (1) how can a team win as many football games as possible by lining up as many cupcakes, and (2) actually how good your football team is.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 1:04 pm to Night Vision
Yep, the ND rating doesn't make sense I don't care what stats they managed to bloat due to their weak schedule.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 1:11 pm to Night Vision
According to this (and they did use this metric to defend their bs), If Notre Dame should be mad at any program, it should be mad at Oklahoma.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 1:22 pm to theballguy
Having Penn State at 14 invalidates the whole thing, imo.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 1:22 pm to fwtex
They don’t otherwise Texas would be in.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 1:23 pm to Tex117
Which is why Texas will and should only play osu and Mich at our house then F the committee and F advertisers and the networks.
Enjoy watching us play Baylor
Enjoy watching us play Baylor
Posted on 12/9/25 at 1:31 pm to Night Vision
I can’t figure out why anyone still views this persons rankings as valid
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News