Started By
Message
Why would a top recruit want to go to the Big10?
Posted on 11/24/25 at 5:03 pm
Posted on 11/24/25 at 5:03 pm
The most boring, uncompetitive games almost every week.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 5:06 pm to Simple Solution
They probably don’t wanna lose to one of the worst teams in the ACC.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 5:06 pm to Taurus 357
quote:
Probably money
Na, that'd be the Texas schools.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 5:07 pm to Simple Solution
Oregon, USC, Michigan and OSU have $$$
Posted on 11/24/25 at 5:08 pm to Simple Solution
quote:
The most boring, uncompetitive games almost every week.
Yeah that Georgia Texas game of 35-10 and the Vandy bludgeoning of Kentucky were real nail biters
This post was edited on 11/24/25 at 5:08 pm
Posted on 11/24/25 at 5:09 pm to Taurus 357
And Tennessee bitch slapping Florida.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 5:10 pm to Volatile
quote:
And Tennessee bitch slapping Florida.
I watched that. Until it was 31-0 at halftime lol
Posted on 11/24/25 at 5:12 pm to Simple Solution
They have a great market. If the big10 was smart they would schedule better. No reason OSU should only be playing two decent teams with one of them out of conference.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 5:16 pm to Simple Solution
quote:
Why would a top recruit want to go to the Big10?
Because the women’s volleyball and field hockey teams are top notch.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 5:26 pm to Simple Solution
So would you say Jeremiah smith made a mistake going to OSU?
Posted on 11/24/25 at 6:08 pm to PSS101
The SEC puts a lot more players into the NFL. If those recruits played the long game, they would make more money than what NIL has to offer.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 6:13 pm to Simple Solution
Last 2 NC's have been two different Big10 teams. Plus Michigan, Ohio State, and Oregon have a higher paid roster than anyone in the SEC.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 6:31 pm to PSS101
quote:
Oregon, USC, Michigan and OSU have $$$
Out of the 18 Big10 teams, the cheapskates that wont commit to football are Rutgers, Maryland, and UCLA. Everyone else spends tons of $$ on football just like the SEC - even Purdue, Illinois, Minnesota, and Northwestern. They simply dont have the recruiting hotbeds that the SEC has.
This post was edited on 11/24/25 at 6:33 pm
Posted on 11/24/25 at 6:35 pm to McNet
Money and exposure. That most of the conference games are crap means nothing.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 6:49 pm to Simple Solution
I don’t even remember the last time an SEC team won a national championship in football. That’s probably why they are going to big ten schools
Posted on 11/24/25 at 6:57 pm to halfadolla50
quote:
I don’t even remember the last time an SEC team won a national championship in football. That’s probably why they are going to big ten schools
If you can't remember 3 years ago that's a you problem. Might want to go to the doctor because you might have a brain tumor.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:04 pm to Simple Solution
I agree that the SEC was wildly entertaining this year. But for me, the parity is something new and exciting in the league. From an Outsider POV, Before this year it has just been Alabama or Georgia winning every year for 10+ years (save 2019).
Hadn’t been that exciting- so not different
Hadn’t been that exciting- so not different
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:07 pm to Simple Solution
quote:
L. If those recruits played the long game, they would make more money than what NIL has to offer.
If you think 18 year old recruits are gonna play the long game, I’ve got some ocean front property on the Vegas strip to sell you
Popular
Back to top

19








