Started By
Message
Say what we will on the NIL, but the product is now better on the field
Posted on 11/2/25 at 8:52 am
Posted on 11/2/25 at 8:52 am
Look at this season and the scores. Everybody can win, everybody could lose.
And that's good for the sport. More people will be in the stands because they believe they have a chance. More people watching for the same reason.
This means more revenue...etc.
These games have been fun to watch this year.
And that's good for the sport. More people will be in the stands because they believe they have a chance. More people watching for the same reason.
This means more revenue...etc.
These games have been fun to watch this year.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 8:54 am to BCreed1
Absolutely! It's fun watching these close games.
But somehow it hasn't translated to the big10 having exciting games.
But somehow it hasn't translated to the big10 having exciting games.
This post was edited on 11/2/25 at 8:57 am
Posted on 11/2/25 at 8:54 am to BCreed1
Easy to say when your team is winning.
You don't see MsSt, Arky, SC or Auburn fans saying the product is better.
You don't see MsSt, Arky, SC or Auburn fans saying the product is better.
This post was edited on 11/2/25 at 8:56 am
Posted on 11/2/25 at 8:55 am to BCreed1
In the sec sure, but big 10 is still ohio state. They sons 25 mill a year on roster. It's like the Yankees, dodgers or the chiefs. It's about who has more money.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 8:57 am to BCreed1
There needs to be a cap on NIL and if they get the money up front they need to pay back for the years they bailed on.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 8:57 am to BCreed1
Yep there is a ton more parity and a lot more teams have a realistic expectation to make the playoffs then ever before - which is a ton of fun.
It's also why coaches potentially looking to make a move are mostly only going to care about NIL and administrative alignment when considering their current job to a new job offer. Those two things are far more important than anything else in winning today's game.
It's also why coaches potentially looking to make a move are mostly only going to care about NIL and administrative alignment when considering their current job to a new job offer. Those two things are far more important than anything else in winning today's game.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 8:57 am to Lonnie Utah
quote:
You don't see MsSt, Arky, SC or Auburn fans saying the product is better.
Can't polish a turd
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:13 am to BCreed1
Agreed
When will fans accept the reality that winning 10 games per year, every year, is not realistic when the conference is basically the NFC North?
We want to run coaches out of town after every loss.
Why is the expectation so much different than the NFL when the product gap inches closer and closer.
When will fans accept the reality that winning 10 games per year, every year, is not realistic when the conference is basically the NFC North?
We want to run coaches out of town after every loss.
Why is the expectation so much different than the NFL when the product gap inches closer and closer.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:14 am to BCreed1
Not sure parity means better product when it comes to the top teams, but yes it does make the games fun. There’s just no teams that would compete from teams just a few years ago.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:17 am to 14&Counting
quote:
You don't see MsSt, Arky, SC or Auburn fans saying the product is better.
Not today, but seeing what Vandy, TTU, and others have done overnight, should give them hope.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:17 am to Bamafig
It is the NFL. No more dominant teams
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:18 am to BCreed1
I prefer the old way because rivalries and conference championships mattered more and don't that much now.
However it did nationalize the sport once again, it had become highly regional for the past 20 years
However it did nationalize the sport once again, it had become highly regional for the past 20 years
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:18 am to BCreed1
Need some kind of salary cap to make the playing field level across the conferences.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:20 am to BCreed1
I liked it better when it was only Alabama paying players openly. At least we all knew who the villain was.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:21 am to BCreed1
Five teams have 1 or 0 SEC wins. Sure, sure.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:21 am to BCreed1
Bum fights were usually much more entertaining than watching a Floyd Mayweather boxing match.
That doesn’t mean the bums were better boxers than Mayweather.
That doesn’t mean the bums were better boxers than Mayweather.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:40 am to BCreed1
Closer games do not equal higher quality. The quality of play is actually down.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:40 am to BCreed1
This is just confirmation bias.
It's the same shite as always, and if anything the quality of the games themselves is way down because players don't get developed as much as they did previously.
The entire game is dumbed down.
I don't think DeBoer even gives a shite about field position.
It's the same shite as always, and if anything the quality of the games themselves is way down because players don't get developed as much as they did previously.
The entire game is dumbed down.
I don't think DeBoer even gives a shite about field position.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:49 am to BCreed1
Its watered down the SEC. Whereas it has strengthened the Big 10. The SEC not only has lost talent from the conference but the talent that stayed is now spread out throughout the conference. Its why there's no real dominating team in the conference. They all have obvious flaws. Winning a NC for the SEC is now exponentially harder.
Popular
Back to top


22










