Started By
Message
The catch not catch in 4th
Posted on 11/2/25 at 7:31 am
Posted on 11/2/25 at 7:31 am
At home, did they show the angle looking from the Florida end zone straight at the receiver? They did once in stadium and never again. Anybody have a clip of that angle?
Posted on 11/2/25 at 7:32 am to RealDawg
Call on the field would not have been changed, either way. That's how close it was.
I do believe the nose hit the ground.
Butvyes. They showed that angle
I do believe the nose hit the ground.
Butvyes. They showed that angle
This post was edited on 11/2/25 at 7:33 am
Posted on 11/2/25 at 7:40 am to retooc
Thanks. In stadium that was only angle that looked definitive but only saw it once.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 7:44 am to RealDawg
You’re better off just not even playing along with them. It was extremely close, the rear angle from behind the receiver definitely shows the ball grazing the grass, but the sideline angle looks like it may have been on his arm at the time. Kind of impossible to square the two unless you have a frame-perfect sync of the two shots to determine which happened first.
BUT, the fact it’s that close means you can’t overturn the call on the field. It was the right ruling.
Everybody hates Georgia and if any close call goes UGA’s way, they’re gonna try to turn it into the scandal of the century. Nobody’s gonna talk about Lagway clearly fumbling earlier in the game or the phantom false start for Gunner “clapping too loud. They see what they want to see.
BUT, the fact it’s that close means you can’t overturn the call on the field. It was the right ruling.
Everybody hates Georgia and if any close call goes UGA’s way, they’re gonna try to turn it into the scandal of the century. Nobody’s gonna talk about Lagway clearly fumbling earlier in the game or the phantom false start for Gunner “clapping too loud. They see what they want to see.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 7:47 am to BranchDawg
The bigger question was of course how in the holy hell did we keep letting receivers behind us..and in that situation.
I agree though..ruling on field is what set the decision. Same with Lagway fumble.
I agree though..ruling on field is what set the decision. Same with Lagway fumble.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 8:13 am to BranchDawg
quote:
Everybody hates Georgia and if any close call goes UGA’s way, they’re gonna try to turn it into the scandal of the century.
Truth.
Bama goes on a 10 year run of unchallenged supremacy and the media falls all over them. We take them to OT in 2017 and Bama still finds a way to win. Undying ESPN adoration.
We get it together and win back to back titles, the first against Bama, and suddenly were talking "Georgia fatigue" in 2023, and without Saban in 2024, suddenly Bama is some scrappy upstart, underdog story.
It's mind boggling.
This post was edited on 11/2/25 at 11:33 am
Posted on 11/2/25 at 8:25 am to BranchDawg
what is lost is the sound the ball makes when it hits the ground, not so thing you hear on replay. The ref called it immediately, so I think he heard it and saw it.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:01 am to RealDawg
I think it was a catch. Gunner would have won it even if they did overrule it though
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:24 am to wdhalgren
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:28 am to KirbySmartass
Fwiw watched tv replay just now on way back home, they did NOT show the direct shot from south-north directly facing the player from upfield on the replay they showed in stadium.
It was the first or second replay they showed in stadium and actually you can hear UGA fans cheer when they show it. It more showed the ball hit ground between arms. They only showed it once.
It was the first or second replay they showed in stadium and actually you can hear UGA fans cheer when they show it. It more showed the ball hit ground between arms. They only showed it once.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:28 am to wdhalgren
It wasn't the nose that hit it was the belly of the ball that hit. Clearly a no catch but also not enough to overturn the call. Lagway didn't fumble the ball. The ground can't cause the fumble.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:43 am to Brick67
Just making the observation the most definitive view wasn’t shown on tv but in the stadium once and the cheer you hear on TV was UGA fans.
Agree, Lagway didn’t fumble.
Agree, Lagway didn’t fumble.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:47 am to Brick67
quote:
The ground can't cause the fumble.
It absolutely can. If a guy is running with the ball in one hand and the ball hits the ground and pops out while he's still up, that's a fumble at every level of football.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:51 am to VADawg
In the Lagway case, it didn’t come out enough imo prior to ball hitting ground and his body touching.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 10:43 am to wdhalgren
They showed that replay once on TV, and then never again. That seemed to be the clearest angle of what appeared to be the ball touching the ground, if it did at all.
Same thing happened with the Auburn fumble. It's almost like the replay guys want to show less clear angles just to create drama.
Same thing happened with the Auburn fumble. It's almost like the replay guys want to show less clear angles just to create drama.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 10:45 am to RealDawg
I thought the full real time clip is better as you can see the ball bounce into his pads. It obviously hit between his forearms and bounced up.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 10:58 am to P-Dawg
quote:
It's almost like the replay guys want to show less clear angles just to create drama.
I think ESPN in particular wants to give the impression that Georgia is the beneficiary of favoritism by the SEC officials, which couldn't be further from the truth. If ESPN's "rules expert" Matt Austin was in charge, Georgia would have 50 yards a game in penalty differential.
This post was edited on 11/2/25 at 11:03 am
Posted on 11/2/25 at 10:59 am to P-Dawg
quote:
They showed that replay once on TV, and then never again.
Interesting. The main espn broadcast I recorded did not show that view. Must have been an alternative feed.
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:26 am to RealDawg
quote:
Interesting. The main espn broadcast I recorded did not show that view. Must have been an alternative feed.
For clarity, I got that image from the 247 board. I assume it's real but it's not my screenshot.
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top

8







