Started By
Message

The catch not catch in 4th

Posted on 11/2/25 at 7:31 am
Posted by RealDawg
Dawgville
Member since Nov 2012
11083 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 7:31 am
At home, did they show the angle looking from the Florida end zone straight at the receiver? They did once in stadium and never again. Anybody have a clip of that angle?
Posted by retooc
Freeport, FL
Member since Sep 2012
7939 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 7:32 am to
Call on the field would not have been changed, either way. That's how close it was.

I do believe the nose hit the ground.

Butvyes. They showed that angle
This post was edited on 11/2/25 at 7:33 am
Posted by RealDawg
Dawgville
Member since Nov 2012
11083 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 7:40 am to
Thanks. In stadium that was only angle that looked definitive but only saw it once.
Posted by BranchDawg
Flowery Branch
Member since Nov 2013
10014 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 7:44 am to
You’re better off just not even playing along with them. It was extremely close, the rear angle from behind the receiver definitely shows the ball grazing the grass, but the sideline angle looks like it may have been on his arm at the time. Kind of impossible to square the two unless you have a frame-perfect sync of the two shots to determine which happened first.

BUT, the fact it’s that close means you can’t overturn the call on the field. It was the right ruling.

Everybody hates Georgia and if any close call goes UGA’s way, they’re gonna try to turn it into the scandal of the century. Nobody’s gonna talk about Lagway clearly fumbling earlier in the game or the phantom false start for Gunner “clapping too loud. They see what they want to see.
Posted by RealDawg
Dawgville
Member since Nov 2012
11083 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 7:47 am to
The bigger question was of course how in the holy hell did we keep letting receivers behind us..and in that situation.

I agree though..ruling on field is what set the decision. Same with Lagway fumble.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
74438 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 8:13 am to
quote:

Everybody hates Georgia and if any close call goes UGA’s way, they’re gonna try to turn it into the scandal of the century.


Truth.

Bama goes on a 10 year run of unchallenged supremacy and the media falls all over them. We take them to OT in 2017 and Bama still finds a way to win. Undying ESPN adoration.

We get it together and win back to back titles, the first against Bama, and suddenly were talking "Georgia fatigue" in 2023, and without Saban in 2024, suddenly Bama is some scrappy upstart, underdog story.

It's mind boggling.
This post was edited on 11/2/25 at 11:33 am
Posted by lewis and herschel
Member since Nov 2009
15399 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 8:25 am to
what is lost is the sound the ball makes when it hits the ground, not so thing you hear on replay. The ref called it immediately, so I think he heard it and saw it.
Posted by BillysIsland
Member since Aug 2025
893 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:01 am to
I think it was a catch. Gunner would have won it even if they did overrule it though
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
4514 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:18 am to
Posted by KirbySmartass
Member since Jul 2020
2911 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Q. Did you think it was a catch?

BILLY GONZALES: No.


Gonzales Post Game Presser
Posted by RealDawg
Dawgville
Member since Nov 2012
11083 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:28 am to
Fwiw watched tv replay just now on way back home, they did NOT show the direct shot from south-north directly facing the player from upfield on the replay they showed in stadium.

It was the first or second replay they showed in stadium and actually you can hear UGA fans cheer when they show it. It more showed the ball hit ground between arms. They only showed it once.
Posted by Brick67
Member since Oct 2012
1450 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:28 am to
It wasn't the nose that hit it was the belly of the ball that hit. Clearly a no catch but also not enough to overturn the call. Lagway didn't fumble the ball. The ground can't cause the fumble.
Posted by RealDawg
Dawgville
Member since Nov 2012
11083 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:43 am to
Just making the observation the most definitive view wasn’t shown on tv but in the stadium once and the cheer you hear on TV was UGA fans.

Agree, Lagway didn’t fumble.
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
47538 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:47 am to
quote:

The ground can't cause the fumble.


It absolutely can. If a guy is running with the ball in one hand and the ball hits the ground and pops out while he's still up, that's a fumble at every level of football.
Posted by RealDawg
Dawgville
Member since Nov 2012
11083 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 9:51 am to
In the Lagway case, it didn’t come out enough imo prior to ball hitting ground and his body touching.
Posted by P-Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
2003 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 10:43 am to
They showed that replay once on TV, and then never again. That seemed to be the clearest angle of what appeared to be the ball touching the ground, if it did at all.

Same thing happened with the Auburn fumble. It's almost like the replay guys want to show less clear angles just to create drama.
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
18837 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 10:45 am to
I thought the full real time clip is better as you can see the ball bounce into his pads. It obviously hit between his forearms and bounced up.
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
4514 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 10:58 am to
quote:

It's almost like the replay guys want to show less clear angles just to create drama.


I think ESPN in particular wants to give the impression that Georgia is the beneficiary of favoritism by the SEC officials, which couldn't be further from the truth. If ESPN's "rules expert" Matt Austin was in charge, Georgia would have 50 yards a game in penalty differential.
This post was edited on 11/2/25 at 11:03 am
Posted by RealDawg
Dawgville
Member since Nov 2012
11083 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 10:59 am to
quote:

They showed that replay once on TV, and then never again.


Interesting. The main espn broadcast I recorded did not show that view. Must have been an alternative feed.
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
4514 posts
Posted on 11/2/25 at 11:26 am to
quote:

Interesting. The main espn broadcast I recorded did not show that view. Must have been an alternative feed.


For clarity, I got that image from the 247 board. I assume it's real but it's not my screenshot.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter