Started By
Message

Chips are down, who would you rather have coach your team Sark or Venables?
Posted on 10/28/25 at 2:28 pm
Posted on 10/28/25 at 2:28 pm
For the next year?
Does your answer change if you have to keep the coach for 5 years?
Pros and Cons with either, but I think the body of work has already prosecuted Venables as a bust at HC and is a high ceiling DC. Sark has shown he can manage a team to success in the new college hellscape of NIL and TP.
I'll take Sark and it not being as close as I thought it would be upon first posing the question, after thinking it through.
Does your answer change if you have to keep the coach for 5 years?
Pros and Cons with either, but I think the body of work has already prosecuted Venables as a bust at HC and is a high ceiling DC. Sark has shown he can manage a team to success in the new college hellscape of NIL and TP.
I'll take Sark and it not being as close as I thought it would be upon first posing the question, after thinking it through.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 2:28 pm to VYForever
Both should be coordinators.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 2:29 pm to VYForever
quote:
Chips are down
Can we make this stop?
Posted on 10/28/25 at 2:29 pm to VYForever
Are those my only choices?
Posted on 10/28/25 at 2:29 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Neither
This is the correct albeit boring answer.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 2:30 pm to VYForever
I would take Venables because we can buy the players.
We just need a coach not to confuse shite.
We just need a coach not to confuse shite.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 2:31 pm to Quicksilver
quote:
Both should be coordinators.
This. Both are born coordinators.
Texas doesn't need an OC, we need an HC.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 2:34 pm to MtVernon
Circle back at the end of the season on this one. Sark has the easiest schedule in the SEC. Venables has the hardest schedule in the SEC Let’s see how each fares down the stretch but Sark’stretch looks like an easy path However it took the refs to get Sark past miss st
Posted on 10/28/25 at 2:55 pm to VYForever
Sark…but one a coach considers NFL, they gone.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:30 pm to VYForever
Neither one. They are both garbage
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:31 pm to VYForever
quote:
Chips are down, who would you rather have coach your team Sark or Venables?
Fold and walk away from the table.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:38 pm to Zgeo
WTF are you smoking? Texas has 3 top 9 teams left on its schedule. Easiest path left you are clearly not even paying attention
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:40 pm to TexasWranglers
OU finishes with at Tennessee, at Bama, Missouri, and LSU lets circle back. Venables currently has the #1 recruiting class for 2027 though.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:43 pm to VYForever
I would say Venables and here is the only reason. Sark is supposed to be an offensive mastermind and we are terrible at offense. If it wasn’t for Nibblet and the special teams things would look vastly different.
Venebals is a defensive coach and the defense is alright. He can always hire an offensive guy that can work out.
Venebals is a defensive coach and the defense is alright. He can always hire an offensive guy that can work out.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:44 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Neither
yeah I go for no coach
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:50 pm to VYForever
Sark. But damn those are terrible choices.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:54 pm to Wishbone85
quote:
Venables currently has the #1 recruiting class for 2027 though.
Really?? That's great! Can't wait for the big payoff in 5 years!!
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:57 pm to VYForever
Venables is a very good defensive coach, but Sark is an offensive genius imo.
That doesn't mean he's a great head coach by any stretch, but I'll take the genius every time.
That doesn't mean he's a great head coach by any stretch, but I'll take the genius every time.
Popular
Back to top

27







