Started By
Message
locked post

It's time to revoke USCw and Nebraska's "Blue Blood" honors

Posted on 10/3/25 at 10:34 am
Posted by FAT SEXY
California
Member since Jun 2020
1159 posts
Posted on 10/3/25 at 10:34 am
I say we replace them with Georgia and Miami
Posted by chkenhawk
Member since Jun 2025
353 posts
Posted on 10/3/25 at 10:42 am to
Blue bloods have been teams with enough long term connections and pull to get away with paying players. Now that every one can pay players that term will mean less and less
Posted by Gatorbait2008
Member since Aug 2015
26517 posts
Posted on 10/3/25 at 10:44 am to
Miami is not in if USC is not..tf..who won the last national title? Remind me.
Posted by Gatorbait2008
Member since Aug 2015
26517 posts
Posted on 10/3/25 at 10:46 am to
To be fair bluebloods can pay more

Alabama, Georgia, OSU, Michigan, LSU, Texas etc have a ton of money so it does.
Posted by BigBro
Member since Jul 2021
19489 posts
Posted on 10/3/25 at 11:10 am to


The Top 7 teams place in the Top 10 in 7+ of the 8 categories.

Teams #8 and #9 place in the Top 10 in 5 of the 8 categories.

Team #10 places in the Top 10 in 4 of the 8 categories.

Everyone else is 2 or less placements in the Top 10.

Georgia is right there IMO. Miami is not close.

eta: The teams listed placed at least once in the Top 10 of a category.

Source: Winsipedia (scroll a little bit)
I removed some of the columns, but it doesn't really change the order. I removed Conference Championships because Notre Dame's average got screwed up. I removed Heisman Trophies because I don't think that should play a role. I also removed Bowl Win % because none of the teams were good in that metric. If you play in a bigger bowl vs a good team and lose, should that be worse than playing in a crappy bowl and winning?
This post was edited on 10/3/25 at 11:20 am
Posted by AUTiger789
Birmingham, AL
Member since Apr 2022
3495 posts
Posted on 10/3/25 at 11:37 am to
quote:

I say we replace them with Georgia and Miami


None of those teams are blue bloods.

IMO:

Blue Bloods…

1. Alabama
2. Ohio State
3. Oklahoma
4. Notre Dame

Elite Programs:

5. Michigan
6. USC
7. Georgia
8. LSU
9. Texas
10. Nebraska
11. Florida State
12. Penn State
13. Miami
14. Florida
15. Clemson
16. Tennessee
17. Auburn

—- BIG DROPOFF—

The next in line…

18. Michigan State
19. UCLA
20. Washington
21. Oregon
22. Texas A&M
23. Wisconsin
24. TCU
25. Arkansas
26. Ole Miss
27. Iowa
28. Minnesota
29. Georgia Tech
30. Pittsburgh
Posted by Gatorbait2008
Member since Aug 2015
26517 posts
Posted on 10/3/25 at 11:42 am to
Just wondering why Michigan is not a blue blood
Posted by AUTiger789
Birmingham, AL
Member since Apr 2022
3495 posts
Posted on 10/3/25 at 11:46 am to
A blue blood are the top programs in the sport, but I draw the line based mostly on being relevant not only now, but throughout time with very few long droughts.

Alabama- won national titles in every decade since the 1960s with the exception of the 1980s…. And they came super close considering they won titles in 1979 and 1992… just missing that 1980s championship and none prior to 1961.

Ohio State- won titles in the 1940s, 1950s, 1960s… then again in the 2000s, 2010s, and 2020s. Missing two decades.

Oklahoma- won titles in the 1950s, 1970s, 1980s, and 2000s.

Notre Dame- won titles in the 1940s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s…. None since 1988 sort of has them on watch IMO.
This post was edited on 10/3/25 at 11:53 am
Posted by RollingwiththeTide62
Member since Aug 2024
4057 posts
Posted on 10/3/25 at 11:49 am to
Abtholutely RIP da boat of dem
Posted by AUTiger789
Birmingham, AL
Member since Apr 2022
3495 posts
Posted on 10/3/25 at 11:49 am to
quote:

Just wondering why Michigan is not a blue blood


Michigan has just three titles. There were some VERY long gaps there without one. They won titles in 1948, but not again until 1997… and then their most recent in 2023.

They are arguably CFB’s most consistently strong program but IMO only three national titles is problematic… and waiting over 20 years between them each time is not a signature of a blue blood.
Posted by Gatorbait2008
Member since Aug 2015
26517 posts
Posted on 10/3/25 at 11:54 am to
They claim 12
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
10452 posts
Posted on 10/3/25 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Just wondering why Michigan is not a blue blood



quote:

They are arguably CFB’s most consistently strong program but IMO only three national titles is problematic



they have the most all time wins of any school currently playing FBS football.
and a big enough lead over 2nd place that they're likely not getting caught in my lifetime (I'm 47).

Posted by MillerLiteTime
Member since Aug 2018
3749 posts
Posted on 10/3/25 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

Blue bloods have been teams with enough long term connections and pull to get away with paying players. Now that every one can pay players that term will mean less and less



The last 2 title winners under the most extreme unlimited NIL where anyone is allowed to do anything have been blue bloods Michigan and Ohio St.
Posted by RollingwiththeTide62
Member since Aug 2024
4057 posts
Posted on 10/3/25 at 12:07 pm to
Bama won natties 20s 30s 50s no 50s
Posted by MillerLiteTime
Member since Aug 2018
3749 posts
Posted on 10/3/25 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

Miami


Miami has 1 national title in the last 30 years. Nebraska has 3. USC has 2.

The whole point of being a blue blood is once you are in that club, it takes 3 or 4 decades of being awful to ever leave it. Minnesota, Army, Navy, Yale, etc is how bad you have to be to lose blue blood status. Nebraska needs another 10-20 years of mediocrity to lose it. USC is nowhere close to being out.
Posted by Yokelhoma
Member since Jul 2021
201 posts
Posted on 10/3/25 at 12:11 pm to
They can claim 100 if they want to, but they only have 3 legitimate ones.

I agree with AUTiger somewhat, in that I think the blue bloods are split into a higher-tier and lower-tier, with the four he mentions as the higher-tier and the other four (Michigan, USC, Texas, Nebraska) as the lower tier. But there's enough separation between that lower-tier and the rest of CFB to give them blue blood status.
Posted by AUTiger789
Birmingham, AL
Member since Apr 2022
3495 posts
Posted on 10/3/25 at 1:56 pm to
Here is a measure of consistent relevancy….

Programs that have never gone more than 15 seasons between AP Top 5 Finishes:

1. Oklahoma- 13 seasons (1988 until ending the streak in 2000)

Programs that have never gone more than 20 seasons between AP Top 5 Finishes:

Oklahoma plus…

2. Alabama- 16 seasons (1946 until ending the streak in 1961)

3. Ohio State- 17 seasons (1980 until ending the streak in 1996)

4. Texas- 18 seasons (1984 until ending the streak in 2001)

5. Notre Dame- 19 seasons (1993 until ending the streak in 2012)

6. Georgia- 19 seasons (1983 until ending the streak in 2002)… I put UGA behind ND because their 2nd longest streak of not finishing in the Top 5 is longer than the Irish’, 14 seasons compared to 11).

Programs that have never gone more than 25 seasons between AP Top 5 Finishes:

Oklahoma, Alabama, Ohio State, Texas, Notre Dame, and Georgia plus…

7. Penn State- 21 seasons (1948 until the streak ended in 1968)

8. Auburn- 22 seasons (1936 until the streak ended in 1957)

9. Michigan- 22 seasons (2000 until the streak ended in 2021)… I put Michigan behind AU because their 2nd longest streak of not finishing in the Top 5 is longer than Auburn’s, 16 compared to 12).

10. USC- 23 seasons (1980 until the streak ended in 2002)

11. Tennessee- 24 seasons (2002 to present). If they fail to finish in the Top 5 by next season, they’ll roll off this list.

Not saying all of the above are blue bloods by any stretch, but I do think it’s impossible to gain blue blood status if you’ve gone quarter century periods of time without a Top 5 finish.

Another interesting stat is this…

Number of combined years without a Top 5 AP finish, adding both the longest and 2nd longest such streaks together:

1. Oklahoma- 23 seasons (streaks of 13 and 10)

2. Ohio State- 27 seasons (streaks of 17 and 10)

3. Notre Dame- 30 seasons (streaks of 19 and 11)

4. Alabama- 31 seasons (streaks of 16 and 15)

5. Texas- 32 seasons (streaks of 18 and 14)

6. Georgia- 33 seasons (streaks of 19 and 14)

7. Auburn- 34 seasons (streaks of 22 and 12)

8. Michigan- 38 seasons (streaks of 22 and 16)

9. Tennessee- 39 seasons (streaks of 24 and 15)

10. Penn State- 40 seasons (streaks of 21 and 19)

11. USC- 40 seasons (streaks of 23 and 17)

12. LSU- 48 seasons (streaks of 26 and 22)

13. Nebraska- 56 seasons (streaks of 30 and 26)

This is where the resumes of Miami and Florida are problematic, IMO. Florida didn’t have a Top 5 finish until the 49th year of the AP poll era… Miami not until the 48th year.
Posted by Wildcat23
Member since Jul 2025
73 posts
Posted on 10/3/25 at 2:22 pm to
I hate Michigan…but if they ain’t a blue blood then no one is. Nebraska isn’t a blue blood. They are a Johnny come lately…they aren’t Oklahoma or Michigan and the few others which include Alabama. Nebraska comp…Florida.
Posted by LOTOTiger
Member since May 2025
85 posts
Posted on 10/3/25 at 2:40 pm to
Under Bob Devaney and Tom Osborne from 1962-1997 Nebraska won fewer than 9 games only twice (the latter 25 of those years, all under Osborne, they never won fewer than 9 games). Over that 36 year period they finished in the AP top 10 25 times. Since Osborne retired, they have had 3 top 10 finishes (all were in the first 4 years after he retired). Osborne and Devaney were the dynasty that made them blue bloods - but 30 years of complete and total mediocrity (and worse) since then tells me they gave up their blue blood card when Tom retired.
Posted by Boomer65
Norman
Member since Sep 2022
893 posts
Posted on 10/3/25 at 2:47 pm to
Blue Blood doesn’t mean anything anymore in 2025. You’re one of the elites or you’re not.
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter