Favorite team:Oklahoma 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:320
Registered on:7/22/2021
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
No one but Aggies thinks A&M is some super selective school. Y'all have like 80,000 students, it's clearly not that hard to get in.

I knew a lot of Texas kids at OU that got into A&M and chose to go to OU instead because A&M is too weird to attend. And I'm not sure if I've ever heard of someone from Oklahoma even considering A&M because it's like a cult version of Oklahoma State.
Ideally we wouldn’t have to vote for anyone to run the country who believes that he answers to an entity no one else can see or hear. Don’t need delusional idiots in the White House.

I’m concerned that Dana thinks it’s gross that I wouldn’t vote for anyone like that.
Do Republicans ever talk about actual issues that matter or do they just constantly try to bring up shite that no one cares about?

That’s a rhetorical question by the way.
Hm, Lawrence is pretty unanimously considered to be a really good college town. I haven't heard anything positive about Gainesville, if I'm being honest.

I don't really like either KU or Mizzou (both are historically terrible and still talk a lot of shite), but it's a fun rivalry to watch because they do not like each other at all.
quote:

Charlie Kirk fricking sucked, and was a terrible person who caused a great amount of harm

Still shouldn’t celebrate people getting murdered though


Also a fair amount of irony in the man getting shot literally at the same time as he was saying gun violence in America is overblown and worth it to have the proliferation of guns that we do in America.

Like, I don't think he (or anyone) should be shot....but, if you spend lots of time and money in helping to make sure that America is filled with guns, AND THEN you go around purposefully antagonizing people in America....you just might get shot.

Also there are a hell of a lot of snowflakes in this thread that are getting very offended over words being used on college campuses. Willing to bet these same folks have used the term "cancel culture" before.
Only reactionaries and monarchists think the French Revolution wasn’t absolutely necessary. The country was being run into the ground and the nobility and clergy, despite making up around 3% of the country, controlled 80% of the wealth, didn’t pay any taxes and had more voting power than the Third Estate (I.e. the other 97%).

It got out of hand with the Reign of Terror, but that doesn’t change the fact that in 1789, shite had to change. People here talk about out of touch politicians in DC—our situation pales in comparison with the French at that time.

re: Week 2, predictions

Posted by Yokelhoma on 9/8/26 at 11:36 am to
Of the games that actually matter and don't involve one school paying the other a bunch of a money for a free win:

Alabama @ Kentucky
Arkansas @ Utah
State @ Minnesota
Mizzou @ Kansas
Oklahoma @ Michigan
Tennessee @ Georgia Tech
Ohio State @ Texas
Arizona State @ Texas A&M

The OU game will be closer than people think, I expect Michigan to be pissed off and to play better than Week 1. I think their defense is good enough to keep it tight going into the 4th. There is a chance it gets out of hand if Underwood implodes under the pressure Venables dials up.
There is no “well, but” excuses explaining away LSU’s win. Any other team dominating Clemson (even in its current state) in that fashion in the first game of a new head coach’s tenure would have their fan base excited.

HowEVAH, I will say that LSU fans do appear to be assuming they have a guaranteed top 5 team. Seems to be a trend with them when they have good performances, feel like they almost relish shite talking more than just watching football. Probably explains why they crash out so hard when their team ends up being shitty.

re: Locked on Clemson quote:

Posted by Yokelhoma on 9/6/26 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

They went from elite to average in a shockingly fast amount of time


Not just average, they’re bad. Wouldn’t finish top 10 in the SEC.

re: Hey Oklahoma

Posted by Yokelhoma on 9/6/26 at 11:11 am to
Yeah, I hope and expect Ohio State beats the hell out of Texas. Would be a great day if we take care of business against 60:01.
I agree that 8-4 is the minimum for Venables but I think some context needs to be added (and I'm guessing it's the same for other teams). There's a pretty big difference between having four losses by the skin of your teeth (and thus being a top 20 team with a hard schedule) and four losses where you're not even competitive. The latter would not be acceptable and would have him on the hot seat.
Oh yeah, our fanbase knew how huge (and more fun) the SEC move was for us. It’s well-known that the move was almost entirely driven by OU and we convinced Texas to join us.

Not just ratings, either, we had tons of recruits we lost out on because they wanted to play in the best conference. That’s no longer the case.
I’ve been to plenty of super hot games in Norman and the stadium was full. OU fans would have shown up regardless of the heat on Saturday but the move to Friday just makes sense. We got some heavy bodies in our fanbase that don’t need to risk sitting in the heat that long.

Mizzou is in Big 10 country so I realize you all don’t understand heat, you best leave this to those of us further south.
I'm not disagreeing that Texas in the SEC >>> Texas in the Big 12 in terms of ratings, but to play devil's advocate a bit, Texas has been a lot better the past three seasons than they were in 2013-2022.

So it wasn't just that they were in the Big 12 (though that clearly didn't help), they were also just really shitty and no one wanted to watch them much. I'd argue that the non-conference games from back then (2016 ND, 2019 LSU, 2022 Bama) were high mostly because Texas hadn't imploded yet. I don't expect them to start sucking anytime soon but it'll be interesting to see what ratings a shitty Texas program in the SEC would get.

re: Lane Kiffin is a fool...

Posted by Yokelhoma on 8/31/26 at 3:53 pm to
Good brisket doesn't need sauce. Anyone eating pork over brisket doesn't really know good barbecue.
Eh, I'll always be excited to see OU football. It helps that we're supposed to be pretty good this year.

College football hasn't been innocent for a long, long time. Y'all seem to think players in the past like Cam Newton had loyalty to their school. That's a laugh. They went to the school that either paid them the most under the table or would get them to the NFL the easiest.

They do need to fix the transfer portal / NIL issues that are effectively creating one-year free agents, there's a reason the pro leagues don't let that happen. And they need to stop cramming as many commercials into broadcasts as possible (this is the one thing that will push me away if it keeps getting worse).

re: Arrogance and delusion

Posted by Yokelhoma on 8/23/26 at 8:50 pm to
Eh, Texas isn’t that good of a school. I have a degree from there, that’s how you can tell.

If you’re a state school, you simply aren’t THAT good of a school. Just because some other state schools are even worse doesn’t make your school good.

At the end of the day, it’s all just gate keeping and the individual’s intelligence and drive matters more than the degree for 99% of cases.
Kind of tacky to boo other bands,

…but before the OU/Texas game each band plays. When Texas’s band plays, they march from their half of the Cotton Bowl towards OU’s, and at a certain point when they’re more towards our half of the stadium, they stop and there’s a moment of silence for about 5-10 seconds before they resume. It’s somewhat of a tradition for OU fans to boo during that moment.

Other than that, no, I don’t boo other bands.
This is right, but Venables is a much better defensive coordinator than Sark is an offensive coordinator. Texas's offenses have been okay under Sark but nothing really noteworthy, while OU's defenses have been basically some of the best in the country under Venables.

So that's why I'm a bit more bullish about Venables than Sark. I think OU has a higher ceiling under Venables + Great OC than Texas does under Sark + Great DC.
Ah shite, last time they did this it was in August 2024 to get ahead of the shitty season they knew we were about to have.

6-6 incoming on the year.
quote:

You're conveniently forgetting the fact that one side loses a lot of money also when going against the narrative.

You can't get a paper published or a grant, arguing against climate change.


Do you think this amount of money is at all comparable to the amount of money at stake for a company like ExxonMobil? There's proof that Exxon knew fossil fuels were linked to the Earth warming decades ago. But they covered it up and paid for misinformation because it wasn't in their financial interest to let that be known.

I'm from Oklahoma, I know what the O&G industry is like. They'll try to convince you the sky is green if it keeps their profits high. Which is completely natural because they're businesses that need to profit or die. I just don't trust a word they say and don't think the climate science community is anywhere near as compromised as them.