Broome vs Flagg for NPOY

Broome likely finishing 2d in most of the POY awards to Flagg has me salty this AM.

Broome’s and Flagg’s season per game stats are almost identical.  In the 4 relevant stats (last one is combined steals/blocks), each leads in 2, with Broome’s 2 “leads” by a greater margin:
 
              Pts Reb Ast S/B
Broome 18.7 10.6 3.3 3.2
Flagg 18.9 7.5. 4.2 2.7
 
Clear advantage Broome.

In the one game they played H2H (on Duke’s floor), Broome was 20/12/4/1 and Flagg was 22/11/4/5. Maybe slight advantage Flagg.
 
What should put Broom way over the top is comparing strength of schedules, and esp conf schedules. Duke SOS was 57, Auburn was 2. Duke played 16 Q3/Q4 games, Auburn played 7. Duke played 15 Q1 games, Auburn played 24.
 
But here’s the clencher — in league play, Auburn’s lowest rated NET opponent was LSU at 89. In Auburn’s game at LSU, Broome was 26/16/0/4. Duke played 11 of their 20 conference games against opponents with a lower NET rating than LSU (3 of those were against sub-200 BC and Miami where Flagg averaged 19/5.3/5.3/1.7)).

Against the ACC’s second highest ranked NET team (Clemson at 22), Flagg was 18/5/1/4. Against the SEC’s second highest ranked NET team (UF at 4), Broome was 18/11/6/2. Against the 5 conf teams (7 games) where the opponent had a NET higher than Clemson, Broome averaged 18.1/9.6/3/3.1.
 
Swap Auburn’s and Duke’s schedules – where would Flagg’s stats be vs Broome’s? POY would be Broome in a rout.