Started By
Message
How far are we from the “top 12?”
Posted on 12/23/24 at 4:26 am
Posted on 12/23/24 at 4:26 am
5-7 this year.
Could have been 4-8 to 8-4 with different sets of breaks, illnessss, injuries,etc
Is 10-2 SEC team in playoffs every year?
Can Arnold win 10 games behind the new offensive line?
Am I too optimistic thinking that we are not far from the playoff IF we are better upfront on both sides of the football and get some breaks?
Could have been 4-8 to 8-4 with different sets of breaks, illnessss, injuries,etc
Is 10-2 SEC team in playoffs every year?
Can Arnold win 10 games behind the new offensive line?
Am I too optimistic thinking that we are not far from the playoff IF we are better upfront on both sides of the football and get some breaks?
Posted on 12/23/24 at 6:47 am to makersmark1
It's more like how far are we from the top 3-4 in the SEC. There are Playoff teams we'd be a coin flip with this year.
Honestly the answer is not that far. More consistent QB play and improving the offensive line and returning to functional special teams and we can compete with anyone on our schedule. The question is do we have the right coaching staff to get us there? They can get the players but can they put it all together on gameday?
Honestly the answer is not that far. More consistent QB play and improving the offensive line and returning to functional special teams and we can compete with anyone on our schedule. The question is do we have the right coaching staff to get us there? They can get the players but can they put it all together on gameday?
This post was edited on 12/23/24 at 6:50 am
Posted on 12/23/24 at 7:15 am to RandySavage
We will be as close as we have and will ever be under freeze next year.
We aren't losing huge in the portal, recruiting is great.
Biggest question is that we aren't willing to go out and get a stellar QB from the portal. Jackson Arnold may turn out great, but to me hes a even trade for Walker White. I can tell Freeze wants to develop QBs so he can have multiple seasons with them and not have to fork out 3ish mil each year. Every other position seems replaceable to him except QB.
That's probably smart by Freeze long term, but hes really just got this one season. If Freeze goes 3 seasons with poor QB play, then as a coach with a reputation for developing and having good QB play, hes really failed. This is fully on how well Freeze can coach Arnold and get the best out of him.
We aren't losing huge in the portal, recruiting is great.
Biggest question is that we aren't willing to go out and get a stellar QB from the portal. Jackson Arnold may turn out great, but to me hes a even trade for Walker White. I can tell Freeze wants to develop QBs so he can have multiple seasons with them and not have to fork out 3ish mil each year. Every other position seems replaceable to him except QB.
That's probably smart by Freeze long term, but hes really just got this one season. If Freeze goes 3 seasons with poor QB play, then as a coach with a reputation for developing and having good QB play, hes really failed. This is fully on how well Freeze can coach Arnold and get the best out of him.
Posted on 12/23/24 at 7:28 am to makersmark1
I think our roster is 10-2 ceiling, 7-5 floor.
Posted on 12/23/24 at 7:37 am to LanierSpots
quote:
LOL
Too optimistic?
I’m frustrated by losses like Oklahoma and Mizzou where we actually played well, but failed at crunch time.
I know we are rebuilding, but will we turn a corner before 2030? 2040? 2050?
Posted on 12/23/24 at 7:48 am to makersmark1
Not as far as many think. We weren’t blown out in any game and many games were really winnable this year. If we get great QB play next year combined with even more talent on the roster combined with the whole SEC being more wide open than it’s been in a long time, maybe not far off at all.
But, it comes down to coaching. Can Hugh do it? Probably not but I hope so. Who knows?
But, it comes down to coaching. Can Hugh do it? Probably not but I hope so. Who knows?
Posted on 12/23/24 at 7:55 am to wareaglepete
We are finally bringing in enough joes where optimism is not unwarranted.
Now is the time to right lot of wrongs.
Now is the time to right lot of wrongs.
This post was edited on 12/23/24 at 8:02 am
Posted on 12/23/24 at 8:02 am to wareaglepete
quote:how many times would a Freezus coached team reached the playoffs had they been structured the way they are now?
But, it comes down to coaching. Can Hugh do it? Probably not but I hope so. Who knows?
i count zero
Posted on 12/23/24 at 8:08 am to makersmark1
We are _almost_ there on talent. One more set of classes like this HS class and now the portal class, and we will be in the top quarter of the SEC in blue chip ratio.
Experience - especially experience that we lack in playing together, under the same system, is what we lack. Our roster next year looks a LOT like Notre Dame's does this year, except that our SOS will not be in the 50's or 60's like ND's was prior to the playoffs. Remember ND's crater vs NW SE MW Illinois or whoever that was? That was a youth meltdown. We will face something more akin to 19-20 SOS with young players still learning to play together, and it's going to show in a couple of games. I suspect we end around 8-4 next year.
The Texas-Clemson game was a great illustration of this. Two veteran teams used to playing together. Clemson wouldn't quit and kept fighting back, the hallmark of a veteran team, and Texas took every shot and then delivered one of their own, another hallmark of a veteran team. In the end, the vastly superior blue chip ratio of Texas was too much for Clemson. Texas went 4 deep at RB with elite guys, lost one early in the season, lost another one in the game, lost their all-star C on the OL, and still rushed for nearly 300 yards. Next man up. That's blue chip ratio ball right there.
Next year, we are ND without the hype machine against a far tougher schedule. We should concentrate on getting revenge on Pavia and OU ($1 to Jackson Arnold's NIL) and maybe upsetting either bammer or UGA. In '26, we're ready for our first run at it all.
Experience - especially experience that we lack in playing together, under the same system, is what we lack. Our roster next year looks a LOT like Notre Dame's does this year, except that our SOS will not be in the 50's or 60's like ND's was prior to the playoffs. Remember ND's crater vs NW SE MW Illinois or whoever that was? That was a youth meltdown. We will face something more akin to 19-20 SOS with young players still learning to play together, and it's going to show in a couple of games. I suspect we end around 8-4 next year.
The Texas-Clemson game was a great illustration of this. Two veteran teams used to playing together. Clemson wouldn't quit and kept fighting back, the hallmark of a veteran team, and Texas took every shot and then delivered one of their own, another hallmark of a veteran team. In the end, the vastly superior blue chip ratio of Texas was too much for Clemson. Texas went 4 deep at RB with elite guys, lost one early in the season, lost another one in the game, lost their all-star C on the OL, and still rushed for nearly 300 yards. Next man up. That's blue chip ratio ball right there.
Next year, we are ND without the hype machine against a far tougher schedule. We should concentrate on getting revenge on Pavia and OU ($1 to Jackson Arnold's NIL) and maybe upsetting either bammer or UGA. In '26, we're ready for our first run at it all.
This post was edited on 12/23/24 at 8:13 am
Posted on 12/23/24 at 8:11 am to jangalang
Most of it depends on Jackson Arnold.
Still need a starting OL from the portal because I don’t think Murphy is going to be good enough to start.
Need an edge rusher and a big time interior guy not just bodies either.
Still need a starting OL from the portal because I don’t think Murphy is going to be good enough to start.
Need an edge rusher and a big time interior guy not just bodies either.
Posted on 12/23/24 at 9:04 am to AUcs13
quote:Still not sold on him being an accurate passer
Most of it depends on Jackson Arnold.
Posted on 12/23/24 at 9:05 am to makersmark1
quote:
I’m frustrated by losses like Oklahoma and Mizzou where we actually played well, but failed at crunch time.
Same. But the reason for a lot of those loses is not the jim and joes.
Some. Yes. Most, NO
But only moar time will tell my friend. We will all see. And hope the folk like me are wrong and paster Hugh will rise to the promise land and take us all with him.
And shower us with virgins
Posted on 12/23/24 at 9:20 am to makersmark1
We are winning SEC next year. Will make playoffs easily
Posted on 12/23/24 at 9:25 am to FlyDownTheField
quote:
If Freeze goes 3 seasons with poor QB play, then as a coach with a reputation for developing and having good QB play, hes really failed.
Freeze seems to disregard the obvious red flags when signing QBs. Arnold makes 2 portal QBs in a row that were benched at their previous schools. Arnold has the tools that PT doesn’t, but he’s still a massive gamble. It might end up costing Freeze his career if Arnold is a bust and he doesn’t get another portal QB for security if he is.
Posted on 12/23/24 at 9:34 am to jvilletiger25
Congratulations.
You found it.... the one tread you hadn't already posted this in.
You found it.... the one tread you hadn't already posted this in.
Posted on 12/23/24 at 9:40 am to TigerHornII
The offseason of sunshine pumping begineth!
We were good enough to go 7-5 or 8-4 this season and herped and derped our way to a losing season.
I have zero expectations this season. If we beat Georgia and it’s not via some flukey plays, I will have some hope.
We were good enough to go 7-5 or 8-4 this season and herped and derped our way to a losing season.
I have zero expectations this season. If we beat Georgia and it’s not via some flukey plays, I will have some hope.
This post was edited on 12/23/24 at 9:41 am
Posted on 12/23/24 at 9:40 am to awestruck
Most important position on the field. Nothing else matters if that position is trash. 
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top


6











