Started By
Message
re: Most Dominant National Chanpionship Performances since 2000
Posted on 3/4/24 at 11:56 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Posted on 3/4/24 at 11:56 am to DisplacedBuckeye
1
Posted on 3/4/24 at 11:57 am to Hback
Imagine if he was as big of a homer as Howard or McElroy.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 11:58 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:00 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Ohio State would be Bama, but better, if we had eSECpn spinning shite for us.
Ohio State's record against Alabama is 1-4 and that has nothing to do with ESPN.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:02 pm to FireDanMullen
44-16 Clemson over bama. As much as I hate to put it on here.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:03 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Yeah you did pretty good against the Western conference. Pretty bad against the SEC, though.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:04 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Of course, because you want to cherry-pick your arse off.
You don’t want to acknowledge you have a losing record against the good teams?
I don’t see how that’s an unreasonable take unless of course, you’re absurdly bias.
Like say, insisting losing 1 receiver would make the difference in losing by 28 points without backing it up with any evidence?
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:07 pm to Knowshon5Dolla
Top-level programs don't care all that much about beating four loss teams in meaningless bowl games.
You're new to winning, but you'll get it if y'all can maintain.
You're new to winning, but you'll get it if y'all can maintain.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:08 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
Pretty bad against the SEC, though.
We have a winning record against SoftEC teams.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:08 pm to FireDanMullen
quote:
You don’t want to acknowledge you have a losing record against the good teams?
I'm remaining objective with the data.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:10 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
I'm remaining objective with the data.
Ok. But you would agree beating teams that actually win championships is more important than beating teams that don’t?
As in, a win vs Georgia is more important than a win vs Vanderbilt? Is that safe to say?
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:26 pm to FireDanMullen
quote:
But you would agree beating teams that actually win championships is more important than beating teams that don’t?
I don't think beating a 6-7 team is all that meaningful. That team winning a two-team invitational or an uncontested beauty pageant at some point in history doesn't change that.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:27 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
and only crossed the 50 yard line once.
And finished said drive behind the 50 yard line anyway.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:29 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
We have a winning record against the teams in the SoftEC.
5-15 against teams while they were in the sec
That is a 25% winning %.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:29 pm to djsdawg
quote:
while they were in
"At the time..."
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:32 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Sorry, but, 4--15-1
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:33 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Congrats on beating those Western Conference teams, though.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:35 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
I thought the final straw happened in 2014 with the Yeldon screen.
That Yeldon screen happened the very next season, which really was the final straw IMO. The Clemson bowl game that year was lagniappe
2014 was, however another game where LSU blew a 4th quarter lead. ALabama had like 150 yards of offense, and Chavis let McCarron drive down the field for a game tying FG in like 30 seconds to force OT
This post was edited on 3/4/24 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:41 pm to jonnyanony
Those are SoftEC teams, sport. And we have a winning record against them.
Posted on 3/4/24 at 12:41 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
You're new to winning, but you'll get it if y'all can maintain.
Georgia is undefeated against the softy Buckeyes.
I'm wondering if your cushy little team will ever beat the Bulldogs.
Page 11 of 19
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News