Started By
Message
Expansion Talk
Posted on 12/8/23 at 11:22 am
Posted on 12/8/23 at 11:22 am
But...
After reading this article Athletic Subscription it looked like the BIG Ten payout would be around 62-75 million per school before Oregon and Washington announced they would leave. Lots of people were projecting 80-100M but this article points out they weren't factoring in FOX's cut in the BIGten network. So adding on Washington and Oregon I'd guess each school payout would still be around the same figure. Maybe slightly more? So we'll say (65M-78M) for TV.
The SEC had a payout of in 533 million in non cbs revenue in 2021 aka the money made from the SEC network. If we add on the new 300M per year contract with ESPN for game of the week that total comes to 833M per year or 59.5 per school per year. Adding in Texas and OU I would expect would increase this number to about 65ish million per school? Right?
With all that said the BIG TEN does look like they will be making around 10 million more based on what I am seeing which is a pretty big deal. They will probably have first pick at adding a NC, CLemson, FSU, or Notre Dame (if they ever join). Am i missing something or is the SEC slightly losing the expansion battle? With NIL becoming more of a factor this seems dangerous to me. Just some thoughts...
This post was edited on 12/8/23 at 11:24 am
9
Posted on 12/8/23 at 11:30 am to MacMan10
No one indicated I needed to learn math
Posted on 12/8/23 at 11:32 am to MacMan10
ESPN/SEC will move to a subscription based model and blow the liner model the BIG has out of the water. I'm excited to pay one price and see all of our games.
Posted on 12/8/23 at 11:41 am to MacMan10
Big Ten absolutely blew the SEC out of the water with the TV deal, but who wins expansion remains to be seen.
SEC will still have the better programs and way more of them.
SEC will still have the better programs and way more of them.
Posted on 12/8/23 at 11:44 am to MacMan10
quote:Adding OU and Texas will not increase the pro rata number for the other schools during the life of the current contract (which runs through 2034). I haven't checked your numbers, but I will caution you that it's a moving target, as the SEC's numbers under the existing contracts do go up somewhat over time. The contract apparently included a pro rata to clause to ensure that adding teams to the conference would result in compensation paid increasing enough that existing schools would not see their payments go down if new schools were added (and that new schools would be paid at the same rate).
The SEC had a payout of in 533 million in non cbs revenue in 2021 aka the money made from the SEC network. If we add on the new 300M per year contract with ESPN for game of the week that total comes to 833M per year or 59.5 per school per year. Adding in Texas and OU I would expect would increase this number to about 65ish million per school? Right?v
Posted on 12/8/23 at 11:47 am to MacMan10
Big 10 schools are going to waste those few extra million on travel costs. The conference used to want contiguous states, but are a mess now.
Posted on 12/8/23 at 11:52 am to MacMan10
What I dislike is they put all their eggs under the ESPN umbrellla. They should have spun off packages of games, one to an OTA network (CBS/NBC/Fox) and another possible streaming option.
It's about getting networks to bid against each other to maximize dollars and the SEC has the best product.
Posted on 12/8/23 at 11:56 am to MacMan10
When does OK and UT pay their membership dues or have they already?
Posted on 12/8/23 at 12:04 pm to MacMan10
FSU is a natural for the SEC.
Posted on 12/8/23 at 12:17 pm to MacMan10
If I was the SEC, I would Add 4 of the following
1.NC State (Cares about FB, Has a Solid BB program)
2.Duke (Wants to win in FB, Top BB Program)
3.Virgina (State the SEC should be in)
4.UNC (Cares about FB, Has a Great BB History)
Maybe, Clemson
if UNC thinks its too good for the SEC
We added OU and Texas
We don't need No More Big Boys in FB.
We Need to Add to the Basketball Resume'
We are Fine in Baseball either way
1.NC State (Cares about FB, Has a Solid BB program)
2.Duke (Wants to win in FB, Top BB Program)
3.Virgina (State the SEC should be in)
4.UNC (Cares about FB, Has a Great BB History)
Maybe, Clemson
if UNC thinks its too good for the SEC
We added OU and Texas
We don't need No More Big Boys in FB.
We Need to Add to the Basketball Resume'
We are Fine in Baseball either way
This post was edited on 12/8/23 at 12:38 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News