Started By
Message

re: A Dynasty BEGINS at 3 Titles Within 4-5 Years

Posted on 12/7/23 at 2:36 pm to
Posted by KirbySmartass
Member since Jul 2020
1833 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

This thread looks like someone with autism, or at least a strong touch of Aspergers, wrote it.


To frame it in language OP is more likely to understand: OP, you’re a fricking moron.
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
10150 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

This is nothing more than a PSA for the confused portion of your fanbase.


Nah it definitely comes off as full-blown beta.
Posted by Fearless and True
N Carolina
Member since Aug 2022
837 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

23


So you have already won both gifted playoff games?
Posted by Fearless and True
N Carolina
Member since Aug 2022
837 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

win a title against someone better than TCU.


They beat Bama for a title. Wait so this means Bama is worse than 5-7 TCU???
Posted by Chip82
Athens, Georgia
Member since Jan 2023
934 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

Winning 29 straight games...probably constitutes a Dynasty.


The previous record was 28 held by both Bear Bryant and Gene Stallings.

But the best frame of reference lies in the fact that Kirby Smart is only 48 years old and Saban didn't win his first natty until he was 52.
Posted by Old Katy Tiger
Texas
Member since Nov 2021
76 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 2:51 pm to
Who died and made chowhound the boss of dynasties?
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
33088 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 5:35 pm to
quote:

Sorry. 2011 doesn’t count by your standard…so that’s only 2 in 4 years…


Hilarious to see him own himself
Posted by Violent Hip Swivel
Member since Aug 2023
2678 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

I think dynasty should be a minimum of 3 championships in a nice round number, like 20 years.

Also, no need for there to be any consistency in coaching or anything tying those titles together



Very well done!
Posted by BamaBravesPackers
Member since Nov 2021
2663 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 5:53 pm to
If your main point is that UGA hasn’t quite hit “dynasty level,” that’s a true statement.

But they’re about 1 NC over the next 2 years away from it and there’s nothing that says you can’t have 2 dynasties happening at the same time.

Celtics/Lakers, 49ers/Cowboys, etc.
Posted by Hmbre97
Round Rock, TX
Member since Jan 2015
576 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 5:58 pm to
Duly noted

Posted by TN Tygah
Member since Nov 2023
2101 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

Once all the dynasties start running together you are allowed to claim the entire era as your dynasty:

09, 11, 12, 15, 17, 20, 23


Scratch off 20 and 23.
Posted by BZ504
Texas
Member since Oct 2005
9585 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 6:04 pm to
At least next you, you won’t have this BS again where an undefeated Power conference team gets left out of the playoffs.
Posted by AUFANATL
Member since Dec 2007
3937 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 6:09 pm to

I guess the question is can you have overlapping dynasties even if one is inferior to the other? Or does the presence of a competing dynasty nullify both claims? Think Cowboys-Steelers in the 70s, Lakers-Celtics in the 80s, etc.
Posted by Clark14
L.A.Hog
Member since Dec 2014
19908 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 6:12 pm to
Can we not just be happy that the Georgia trolls have been quieted?
Posted by A Lite
Member since Jan 2016
2401 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

Weird this has to be said, but I see a lot of mUlliGAn fans on the board that seemingly have no idea what a dynasty actually is.


All they have to do is read an entry in a dictionary to see what a dynasty is. They should be able to do that. It's as clear as day.

Posted by PowHound
The Peoples Moderator
Member since Jul 2014
6848 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

Winning 29 straight games...probably constitutes a Dynasty.


No, it doesn't.

Look it's not my opinion, it's fricken common knowledge that a dynasty can not be claimed until a third title is won inside a four-five year period. That is what makes them uber special. Otherwise any ol Clemson or mUlliGAn flash in the pan can claim a dynasty.

Concentrate on winning your conference one day, and then go for the dynasty would be my advice.

Posted by tigersbh
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
10350 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 7:19 pm to
It’s very odd how insecure Alabama fans are.
Posted by Rabern57
Alabama
Member since Jan 2010
13366 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

Georgia is 1-5 vs Bama under kirby. That is the opposite of a dynasty.
A record verses 1 team doesn't say anything. Bama rarely plays UGA unless it's in the postseason.

NCs matter most and they have 2 in row and could still finish top 5.
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter