re: UPDATE: Backup Florida QB Jalen Kitna Child Porn Charges Dropped

quote:

---

Is this why you spend so much time on the internet now? You’re not fooling anyone bro. Anybody actually like you’re describing wouldn’t need to frick 16 year olds because we aren’t fricking gross.

---

I really do not want to upset you because I can tell this is pissing you off. But I just wanted to point out you had one hell of a humble brag in your post. The way you said "we" when describing a guy with a great body and boyish looks that wouldn't need 16 years olds was outstanding.

Seriously, I thought it was great.

quote:

---

I’m talking about you being a bragging pedophile. Come brag about it to my face.

---

Yes, tell me how you are morally superior while threatening me with an actual crime(which btw, is an actual crime in itself). My favorite!

quote:

---

Yes, tell me how you are morally superior while threatening me with an actual crime(which btw, is an actual crime in itself). My favorite!

---

Gatorbait24.......awaiting your retort. Take your time. This one will be tricky.

quote:

---

No, I was the military guy with the great body and boyish looks that your girlfriend wanted to frick.

---

You were such the ladies’ man that you resorted to 16-year-olds?

The fact that you’ve been defending the indefensible for hours and hours is deeply disturbing.

Log off and just stop.

quote:

---

Pedophilia is when an individual seeks sexual gratification from children. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of a Child defines a child as anyone under 18, ratified by 195 countries. It’s literally the most widely ratified human rights treaty in the world.

So, yes, banging a 16 year old does in fact make him a pedophile.

---

Wow, that's a hell of a stretch. I'm pretty sure you are talking about something that is about child labor laws being ratified, and then you've from that started to apply your own sexual moral standards and definitions.

Beyond that, the way you are defining it and suggesting it be used would also mean that anyone who has sex under the age of 18 is by default engaging in sexual abuse. Even those who are the same age.

You allow absolutely no room for range, which is also to mean that if someone turns 18, and the other person is only 2 days younger than them, then it makes the person 2 days older a pedophile.

That's all fricking ridiculous. Do you not understand that the actual basis of laws in spirit is based on 1 simple principle: IS THERE A VICTIM? You ignorantly don't even remotely apply this principle here. You don't give a frick if there is an actual victim, you just want to create one.

quote:

---

You were such the ladies’ man that you resorted to 16-year-olds?

The fact that you’ve been defending the indefensible for hours and hours is deeply disturbing.

Log off and just stop.

---

resorted?

You do realize I am talking overall about a period of time of about 3ish years, and that I didn't just exclusively have sex with people that age?

Beyond that, I'm not defending the indefensible. There is literally nothing I have to worry about, everything I did was legal then, and is still legal now.

I posted because I think it's bullshite that people try to pretend these things are black and white with this age stuff.

quote:

---

Amazing thread

---

Yes. We have even had one poster bring slavery and the United Nations into the conversation. Don’t think anyone has actually discussed the original link in at least 5 pages. Just a great thread, that after this post, I am staying as far away from as possible.

Judging by the fact that he shared the pics on a forum to someone who clearly didn’t ask for it and was so appalled by it they reported him to Discord and the police, the following are my theories, based on that and other info in the report:

1. It wasn’t him with an underage girl, because he said he found the pic on the internet.

2. People who get caught sharing child porn seem to be members of groups that share it amongst themselves. Since he shared it with someone who didn’t want it, that tells me that he didn’t think it was bad, or at least it was marginal or questionable.

3. I think it was a picture of someone he knows that is underage (either the guy or girl or both). Possibly revenge porn and he shared it to another friend thinking they would think it was interesting or funny.

Of course I could be wrong. It just doesn’t make sense for a child pornographer to just randomly share child porn with a regular person.

there hasn’t been shite for pearl-clutching about the weed in this thread. Solid attempt at spin though.

quote:

---

quote: Yeah, but you shouldn't be banging (or bragging about banging) high school sophomores and juniors when you're 23.

Not only would every single person here have done the same things I did, you've all probably done it or worse.

---

WTF? The fact that you think that is very telling. Like, how mentally deranged people think they’re normal or even better than the norm.